Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
David Timoney Profile picture
@fromarsetoelbow
Sep 30, 2020 • 4 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
We've had 40 years (50 if you start the clock running in South America) in which democracy has been undermined by managerialism & technocracy. The justification was variously order (anti-communism), efficiency (the freedom to manage) & choice (the demotion of public goods).
This marked a notable turn against the historic arguments against democracy, which dated from Plato, that the mob were unskilled, biddable & lacking in virtue. Trump & Brexit have have allowed this older tradition to be revived in the liberal critique of "populism".
But what is offered as an alternative is simply the post-democracy of recent decades: the extension of the market, soft authoritarianism branded as progressivism, & the refusal to consider systemic change while virtue-signalling about the system's many contradictions.
If we have "no competing agendas" in the US Presidential election, that isn't the fault of one side alone. The "poisonous noise" arises because otherwise there would be a vacuum.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with David Timoney

David Timoney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fromarsetoelbow

David Timoney Profile picture
May 31, 2023
New masterly inactivity just dropped ...
Obviously those imagining that Starmer will reverse course once he gets in ("The man is a consummate liar & that's why I'm voting for him") are going to be disappointed, but even those advocating the long game are sketchy on how the change in public opinion will come about.
The point to remember is that that the pro-EU establishment abjectly failed after 1992 to build a popular consensus in support of the project, partly because they wouldn't take on the europhobic press & partly because the EU was always a convenient excuse.
Read 4 tweets
David Timoney Profile picture
May 31, 2023
Catherine McKinnon has, to use her own phrase, "winged to the Right" on topics such as porn & sex work, effectively providing feminist cover for reactionary politics, but this springs from a critique of liberation rather than a shared censoriousness.
That distinction is made clear in her take on trans rights. She has remained consistent in seeing "women" as a social construct rather than a biological essence, a point she makes well here. Image
And the inescapable logic of that is a critique of gender critical feminists as people who are insincere in their claim to be motivated by the excesses of male power. Image
Read 6 tweets
David Timoney Profile picture
May 3, 2023
Lol. There are literally millions of people directly descended from William the Conqueror alone before you start getting down to the churls. Image
The problem with "ancestors" is that a lot of people imagine a pyramid with a couple at the top. But it's actually an inverted pyramid. Every generation going back doubles in number: you have 2 parents, 4 grandparents etc.
If you assume a generation of 30 years (i.e. birth to birth), 937 years back gets you 31 generations. 2^31 is 2.1 billion. Of course, there may have been a bit of in-breeding back then, particularly among the Southron folk, so the figure may be slightly lower.
Read 4 tweets
David Timoney Profile picture
May 2, 2023
As usual, this fantasy is premised on the idea that there are lots of trained doctors & nurses available in the private sector. Leaving aside for the moment that many NHS medics moonlight (i.e. they're the same people), economics 101 tells us that this can't be true.
If it were, and at the scale necessary to make a dent in NHS backlogs, private healthcare would be carrying very large deadweight costs that would make it unprofitable. If those resources are fully utilised, this means the NHS will be in competition with private providers.
Those firms won't divert scarce resources to the NHS as that would be killing their primary business. More likely is that it will drive up the market rate (demand exceeding supply) allowing those private firms to import foreign medics at a premium to supply the NHS.
Read 4 tweets
David Timoney Profile picture
May 2, 2023
That £9bn would cover all students, not just middle-class ones, and it includes maintenance grants, which obviously skew heavily towards students from lower income families. The "middle-class subsidy" is much lower.
It is true that the UK's tax burden (all tax as a % of GDP) is historically high, but it's still currently lower than the EU14 & the G7 . A projected high of 37.7% in 2027-28 will simply take us to the G7 average today.
As ever with tax, the key point to bear in mind is incidence: on whom does the burden most heavily fall. And that is lower income groups due to the regressive nature of VAT, the way tax-free allowances work, and, yes, middle class subsidies.
Read 4 tweets
David Timoney Profile picture
Apr 30, 2023
We've been building homes for decades. The whole point of the moratorium on council houses was to shift activity/profits to the private sector, not to curtail building. You can criticise the housing industry for land-banking, but the reality is that we're not short of homes.
The secular problem is the fall in household density since the 60s (in simple terms, the ratio of people to bedrooms), which is the consequence of easier divorce, greater longevity (& the difference between male & female, i.e. more widow years), and fewer kids per family.
The state gave up on the provision of housing in the late-70s (under Labour) because it realised that greater supply would simply stimulate greater demand. The recurrent cry to "build more social housing" remains in denial about this political settlement.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(