What's funny to me is that they either thought people wouldn't actually do it, or more likely they are confused and dismayed at how much "whole selves" some of us have. I'm reminded of @AnandWrites talking about how limited a lot of these tech leaders actually are.
I wanna try to convey something important. And it's hard because even I get tired of being cynical sometimes. But I think it's important to unpack what's really happening here as these companies admit that they don't care about what happens to you outside of work.
Those who advocate for increased diversity, equity, and inclusion have been pushing this mantra of "bring your whole self to work". We do it because we recognized it was necessary in order to make space for people who aren't white dudes. Our whole selves have never been welcome.
Even as we saw uptake on this from tech leaders, we knew it wasn't because most of them actually cared. It falls under the heading of "I'll tell you whatever you need to hear if it means you'll show up and do work". And that's okay with me. It's part of the contract.
The problem here is that it was never a request for just lip service. They didn't really understand what they were signing up for. They have never had to deal with people's whole selves. They thought it wouldn't actually matter. It does.
"Bring your whole self to work" has been turned into a platitude. A pithy slogan. It was never that. What it means is that as companies demand more and more of our time and labor, we demand that they offset that by addressing the other life things that impact our lives.
You can't demand ever-increasing productivity from people without working to make sure they have more space to provide that productivity. It's not free. People don't have infinite capacity. If you want more, you have to create more. There is a cost.
What we are seeing is that tech leaders were never ready to pay that cost. They thought this would be the same kind of extractive, one-sided relationship that they've always had with us. Some lip service and some extra perks to keep us quiet. Nah son. It's different this time.
There is a growing movement against the status quo of extractive capitalism. And it is driven by growing inequality. More and more people can see that these assholes are not suffering due to our getting "distracted" from work. They are still making billions off of us.
The idea that "bringing politics into the workplace" is hurting business just doesn't bear out. We are supposed to be in a major recession. And yet tech companies are the most profitable companies that have ever existed. We're watching the most successful IPOs in history unfold.
This isn't about their bottom line. It never was. What this is about is that these tech leaders are finding it hard to ignore our demands. In order to keep us productive, they have to keep addressing these things that are not about business. And they just don't want to do that.
After the last several years of being pushed into DEI work, we're seeing them lose energy to keep pretending to care. Brian Armstrong, Zuckerberg, they're telling you straight up. Keep your whole self outside of work. If it's not about making them money, they don't wanna hear it.
So here's the thing. The relationship between employer and employee has always been about a shared contract. If you want to extract my labor, here's what I need from you. And just like productivity demands keep going up, our demands need to keep going up as well.
That's just business, just as surely as any other form of business that these assholes claim to care about. They can either meet our demands or stop making money off of us. It's that simple. They just don't wanna hear it. So we're going to have to show them.
The purpose of this thread is to get more of you to start thinking about this as a labor movement. If you let them control you by holding your livelihood under threat, they will continue to extract more and give you less. But you have leverage. You have to use it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm getting serious about finding a new home online. Nothing else has been particularly appealing to me so far.
I can post my own bullshit anywhere. And I'm not all that concerned with who shows up to follow it. I do want more community though. I wanna be where people are. People express themselves on Twitter in a specific way that I've found gives me energy and inspiration.
I have a lot of feelings about being labeled gifted as a child. My story feels a little different though. I never wanted gold stars, and I still don’t care about “accomplishments” the way other people do. This came up recently in a way that I’m still processing.
I often tell people that I identify with Gen-X more than millennial. (Even though people insist on putting me the latter category based on my birth date). For me it’s the messages I internalized growing up. Gen-Xers were “slackers”. Not living up to their potential. That’s me.
Then @operaqueenie hit me with a bomb not too long ago. I used to try to identify as a “loner”. A person who was reluctant to lead but also resistant to being a follower. But loner didn’t feel right either. Instead my wife says that I insist on personal agency above all else.
I keep hearing people say this. And I believe it. But maybe I just don't use Google the way other people do. It seems fine to me. What kind of searches are bad?
I also wonder if some people are having very different experiences depending on their personal algorithm. Google has been learning about how I search, and what I'm looking for, for a long time now. Maybe it's just dialed in for me?
It never felt like magic to me. Nor do I want it to be. I still look at the results and use my judgment to decide if they're any good. That's not meant to sound judgmental. But expecting tech to feel like magic can only lead to disappointment.
I'm glad to see you're engaging with the material. Even if it hasn't quite hit home yet. We don't have a lot of practice with actually examining Whiteness. It can feel uncomfortable at first. I'm happy to answer any questions you have as long as they're honest and not asinine.
The infographic in the OP requires context. We shouldn't get stuck in simplistic ways of looking at this. The idea isn't "only white people have these traits". The idea is "Whiteness uses these traits to create a culture around their own superiority".
I used to work in the same office with this white woman who is thinking "I wish we could go back to vigilante groups that could just go around hanging people."
If you can't be bothered to read the screenshots, this is the highlight: She's scared. As a white woman, she's scared all the time. And instead of examining where that comes from, she wants there to be institutions dedicated to roaming around doing violence on her behalf.
We didn't work closely together. I can't say anything about what kind of person she was. I try to stay out of white women's way at work. Just as a rule for survival. I have so many stories of how I've broken that rule and regretted it.
Small personal life update. Since being laid off, I've been dusting off technical skills and spending more time typing. It has been a journey of finding out how long I can be at the computer each day.
I was having a hard time as a remote-only manager. The sheer amount of hours staring at zoom screen was too much for me. But I used to be able to of uninterrupted time coding. I enjoyed it a lot too.
I've realized a few things during this journey though. I wouldn't actually spend all my time with hands on keyboard. Coding for me included all of activities around thinking, planning, and researching as well as actually producing the code.