The Washington Post published this shocking chart today.
It's got everything to do with the future of community colleges in the US. Source: washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/…
Last week, @NSClearinghouse released some preliminary data on enrollments (It represents about 22% of IHEs.) which looked surprisingly not bad for 4-yr institutions, but terrible for community colleges. Source: nscresearchcenter.org/stay-informed/
What's notable is that during the last recession, community college enrollment went up. What's different this time?
source: ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/easyblog/commu….
The difference this time: COVID and the recession have been a dual disaster for the poor and other groups that make up a larger portion of 2-yr enrollments. They have suffered disproportionately in terms of health and employment.
Poor people are much more likely to attend 2-year colleges. Only 36% of people in the lowest quintile who attended any postsecondary institution went to a 4-year school. In the second quintile that number is still below 50%.
source: nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/i…
COVID also been especially terrible for people in their 20s and early 30s when it comes to jobs. 2-yr schools enroll a not just more poor people but more students over 24.
During the last recession, even as total enrollment and revenue at community colleges rose, funding per FTE declined. That will definitely happen again. It's already happening in some states.
The decline in community college enrollment + the deep cuts in state funding for community colleges present a dire threat to these institutions, which will likely have to respond by cutting services that increase retention, transfer, and completion, not to mention feed people.
In a nutshell, things are terrible. And they're going to get worse, especially if Republicans hold the Senate and we continue to suffer delay after delay in relief funding.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is such good reporting from the @harvardcrimeson:
There are about 27,000 high schools in the U.S.
Over the past 15 years, 1 in 11 students at Harvard have come from just 21 high schools.
So 9.1% of Harvard students come from 0.07% of US schools. @nytdavidbrooks
This is no accident. It's a stated priority of Harvard admissions.
The longtime dean of admissions said they're in the business of creating 100 year relationships with schools. He said this in a trial where Harvard was, believe it or not, trying to show it's fair.
Legacy, too, plays its role, as these are the kind of schools where wealthy alumni send their kids.
The most heavily weighted single factor in the Best Colleges rankings is Undergraduate Academic Reputation, which USN calls "Expert Opinion."
Here's the thing: there is absolutely no way the presidents, provosts, and deans of admissions they send the survey to can be qualified to answer the questions, let alone claim expertise.
Let's talk about some dumb stuff people say about test optional admissions. 🧵
This might take a sec, so here's the tl;dr:
TO policies, in and of themselves, are neither a cure-all for what's wrong with American higher ed nor the end of what's good about it, but the evidence points to their doing some good and no harm.
Let's define TO first.
A test-optional policy is one that allows applicants to decide whether they want their test score to be considered. It does not "get rid of tests" or "ban tests."
Almost every 4-yr college in the US is currently test optional.
For decades, colleges, med schools, and law schools have all made the point that standardized tests exist to show readiness to succeed in college or grad school.
Rankings were one of the incentives to focus on scores well beyond the readiness threshold and overemphasize tests. That emphasis has excluded lots of people who were highly qualified to become lawyers and doctors.