Prakhar Pratyush •/G_m Profile picture
Oct 1, 2020 12 tweets 2 min read Read on X
A thread on de Rham's Theorem from Differential Topology:

"Euclid missed a great opportunity here: if he had stated the principle , 'The extremity of an extremity is empty' ,he could be considered as the discoverer of the BASIC EQUATION OF HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA: d•d = 0." 1/n
This basic equation of Homological Algebra is just an abstract incarnation of something we encounter at different places in Mathematics. Like, in Topology given a space X with boundary, one can not construct boundary of that boundary 2/n
( imagine a Unit disc for example, its boundary is a circle but circle itself has no boundary ),next in Vector Calculus,we all learn things like div(curl)F=0 and curl(grad)f=0,where F and f are vector/scalar fields on a X (with some extra structure to do Calculus on it) 3/n
One might wonder if the previous two incarnations of the same equation d•d=0 are in some sense related? Afterall the underlying space involved in both the cases is X (with some extra structure ). As it turns out, there's a positive answer to that. 4/n
Before i state the actual correspondence lets try to appreciate what this correspondence would eventually achieve. In Topology, we are very Interested in figuring out when two different looking spaces are same upto a given condition/property? 5/n
and further we would like to Classify spaces upto that property. This is an extremely difficult task unless we make it simple by attaching to various spaces, objects which we can handle easily. More precisely these objects are Algebraic in nature called (Co)homology groups. 6/n
So now we can compute (Co)homology groups of two different spaces and see if we get the same answer and if we do get the same answer then underlying spaces share some Properties. In particular, let two spaces be a punctured disc (disc with one point missing ) and circle 7/n
at first these two spaces look very different but their (Co)homology groups are same and that is Z (group of Integers ), what this tells us is that both spaces have 1 hole. 8/n
Further, the way we actually compute these groups involves the equation d•d=0. Now recall I mentioned two different incarnations of this equation, that means we get two ways of extracting information about X - argument ). 9/n
one by considering space X itself ( that boundary of boundary Argument ) and the other by considering the extra structure on X which allows us to do Calculus on it (Vector Calculus Argument ) 10/n
These two ways give us two different (Co)homology groups. The first incarnation leads to what we call Singular (co)homology groups and the other one leads to de Rham (co)homology groups. Now let's state that beautiful correspondence we are after. 11/n
de Rham's Theorem-

Singular (Co)homology groups are isomorphic( same for all purposes) to de Rham (Co)homology groups.

Moral of the Story:
Calculus on space X somehow gives us useful information about the Topology of X. 12/n , n=12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prakhar Pratyush •/G_m

Prakhar Pratyush •/G_m Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pursuingstacks

Sep 20, 2020
An excerpt taken from Mike Shulman's Homotopy Type Theory - A Synthetic Theory of higher equalities-
"It is important to understand that rules of Type theory are not the same sort of thing as the axioms of a theory like ZFC or ETCS." 1/n
"Axioms are statements inside an ambient superstructure of (usually first-order) logic, whereas
the rules of type theory exist at the same level as the deductive system of the logic itself." 2/n
"In a logic-based
theory like ZFC, the “basic act of mathematics” is to deduce a conclusion from known facts using one of the rules of logic, with axioms providing the initial “known facts” to get started." 3/n
Read 5 tweets
Sep 19, 2020
The hole argument was invented by Albert Einstein late in 1913 as part of his quest for the general theory of relativity.
plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacet….
"What is space? What is time? Do they exist independently of the things and processes in them? Or is their existence parasitic on these things and processes? Are they like a canvas onto which an artist paints; they exist whether or not the artist paints on them?" 1/n
"These questions have long been debated and continue to be debated. The hole argument arose when these questions were asked in the context of modern spacetime physics. In that context, space and time are fused into a single entity, spacetime, and we inquire into its status." 2/n
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(