When you start trading a thoroughly tested system once it has created in you the fullest faith through the testing process, you feel an immense sense of calm through losses and profits. If you don't trust your system completely, you haven't tested your system rigorously.
And, when you don't trust your system completely, that's when your monkey brain asks you to intervene and do stupid things that will skew the system's results. Intervening and making a loss is great. It reinforces the sense of "knowing" to trust your system and not mess with it.
What would be disastrous is intervening with discretion and actually making a profit or even a windfall in one trade. This brings negative reinforcement, lures you into thinking you can intervene and that your discretion and intuition are better than the system you have tested.
This eventually leads you to doing certain things that will lead you into bigger losses than what you'd have got if you had followed the system. That's when you'll know that you have been shown your place by your system.
If you have a system that you have thoroughly tested and rigorously checked using the right tools and methods, it pays to place the fullest trust on the system, even in understanding when the system no longer works by looking at the deviations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One major thing I have come to realise over the last couple of years:
Those who promote a single asset-class or single instrument *fully* systematic trading are scamming you or misleading you into thinking it will work over the long term if you stick to the system.
This is more applicable to those breakout style systems that intend to do trend following.
By nature, trend following is a way to capture the right tail.
If you look at trend following CTA portfolio over last few decades, you'd see that equity isn't a major part.
They allocate to equity/indices only as a form of diversification.
The reason single asset/instrument trend following doesn't work for very long is a factor of efficiency.
Main purpose I bought is for use through optical cable from TV.
But now that I have seen and heard this speaker - I'd say the quality over bluetooth connection is mostly in-discernible to a normal listener from the optical output.
These were the settings I tested with. Full bass and treble, 55% volume roughly.