Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Matt Stoller Profile picture
@matthewstoller
Oct 1, 2020 • 7 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
Fascinating dynamic at this hearing on antitrust and big tech. You got three Brandeisians testifying, two moderate Dems, two big tech libertarians, and anti-monopoly conservative @rachelbovard.
Ugh, @Jim_Jordan is such a dumb blowhard. In a serious hearing about monopoly power he's continuing to allege that big tech promotes progressives and censors conservatives. Then goes after Dems for trying to "radically rewrite antitrust laws."
Every single Republican on this subcommittee is serious except @Jim_Jordan. Some of the Rs don't want to change the laws, some do. But no one is a clown like Jordan and his clown staffer Tyler Grimm.
Obama Antitrust chief Bill Baer is saying that antitrust law went dark for 25 years, and blames the Chicago School. That's not what he was saying in 2016 when he was in charge.
"From oilfield services—our most recent success—tax prep, online ratings, cable/internet, canned tuna, cooking appliances, cell phones, equipment for next-generation semiconductors, to monopolization of airport slots, we have done our job." - Bill Baer justice.gov/opa/speech/act…
Amazing statement by @econliberties advisor @ZephyrTeachout attacking judge-made antitrust law.
Now @ZephyrTeachout attacks our "planned economy," except the planners she notes are big tech monopolies.

Basically the eight most frightening words in the English language are "I'm from Facebook, and I'm here to help."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Matt Stoller

Matt Stoller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matthewstoller

Matt Stoller Profile picture
May 26
1. Pope Leo XIV wrote a long policy statement on AI. I'm reading it, it's pretty interesting. I'll pull relevant quotes. vatican.va/content/leo-xi…
2. "Today, however, the main drivers of development are private, often transnational, parties that are endowed with resources and the capacity to intervene that surpass those of many Governments."

Very similar to statements from many politicians about the power of big tech.
3. He's hostile to efficiency as a moral lodestar.

"Babel thus reveals the limits of any effort that, however grandiose, arises from self-affirmation, sacrifices human dignity for efficiency and aspires to reach heaven without God’s blessing."
Read 6 tweets
Matt Stoller Profile picture
May 22
Xavier Becerra is likely to become the California governor. He’s dumb, arrogant, incompetent and tolerates criminal behavior by staff. He’ll likely be recalled fairly soon.
“Becerra out-polls all of his rivals when it comes to Black and Latino voters.”

I’m a broken record, but corporate power in the Democratic Party flows through black boomer voters.

yahoo.com/news/articles/…
Becerra go large sums of money from Chevron, Meta, and PG&E. He’ll raise costs and harm California residents. At some point we have to be honest about older black voters choosing these awful leaders to bring ruin.
Read 9 tweets
Matt Stoller Profile picture
Apr 1
The reason Democrats have no position on the war is because no one has a coherent view on what to do. It’s not on them.

The U.S. is basically the bank account and army for global oligarchs. This positioning is not good for Americans and it’s not good for the world. But it’s also impossible to imagine an alternative.

The foreign policy establishment sees their work as a hobby. The U.S. is so endlessly rich and heroic that it’s all a game. They don’t think that the realm of foreign affairs should be good for ordinary people; that’s a rhetorical afterthought. To them the deindustrialization and erosion of the middle class at the heart of the destabilization of the world is sad but necessary, if they bother to notice it at all.

The left foreign policy world is not actually that different. They are libertarian and hostile to Americans, and they don’t care about economics. Foreign policy to them is a hobby of the rich, it’s just the U.S. is the central villain instead of central hero. They do not understand or care about deindustrialization as a result of Chinese overcapacity, which is a central and fundamental foreign policy challenge. To them that’s handwaving away as ‘economics’ and boring. Let’s just do ‘care’ work, they imagine, as if a nation that makes nothing and imports food can afford to have its young people do nothing but wipe the asses of the old.

What does a non-oligarch driven America actually do? What does it look like? Well for starters we pull back dramatically from the rest of the world. No troops in Europe, maybe offer some defense weapons to East Asian nations. No presence in the Middle East. Cut Israel loose entirely. Total revamp of our bloated and incompetent military and its corrupt establishment. Fire most admirals and generals and put in a new generation capable of actually thinking.

This change will require us to be a LOT more protectionist. We put up huge trade barriers so that we can rebuild our industries. We also impose capital controls and confiscate or tax assets held by foreigners. No foreign ownership of land. We are not your bank account, Mr. Saudi Prince or Chinese money launderer.

Finally, we crush capitalism. Rebuild our farms and factories. No more driving our corporations for shareholders. Lots of public utility regulation or nationalization of assets. No more private equity. No more crypto or corporate gambling. If you want to make money, you do something useful. Otherwise it’s poverty or handcuffs.

America needs to be run for its people, not for the Epstein Class or for weirdos who can’t go over the Iranian overthrow of the shah or for lefty hobbyists funded by Koch industries to deindustrialize what’s left of what we have.
I was a China hawk because the U.S. was a possible balance to their power. No longer. We are too weak and must go into an emergency posture to protect ourselves.
Americans do not feel sovereign in their communities or as workers, so they do not see value in US sovereignty. It’s critical to crush Wall Street to regain American independence.
Read 4 tweets
Matt Stoller Profile picture
Dec 11, 2025
1/3. A good day for antitrust. The Ninth Circuit mostly upheld the injunction against Apple for screwing app developers in the lawsuit vs Epic Games. Apple can charge, but only for its actual costs. fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/…
2/3. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued medical health care records monopolist Epic Systems. texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/…
3. Senator Blumenthal asked for an update on the FTC's dialysis investigation. blumenthal.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Read 4 tweets
Matt Stoller Profile picture
Oct 7, 2025
In her oversight hearing today, Attorney General Pam Bondi got a surprising number of questions about corruption at the Antitrust Division. Here's @amyklobuchar.
Here's Senator Mazie Hirono asking about corruption in the Hewlett-Juniper merger case, Bondi responds by saying that Hirono was out protesting with Antifa.
And here's Senator Cory Booker asks about Bondi's chief Chad Mizelle, asks if she'd come before the antitrust subcommittee to talk about the topic. Bondi dances around, basically says no. "I will let Gail Slater handle all antitrust" matters.
Read 6 tweets
Matt Stoller Profile picture
Jul 31, 2025
I'm baffled by @DKThomp's piece on Dallas housing.

He claims that Dallas builds so many houses that there can't be an oligopoly fostering a lack of housing.

He also claims Dallas doesn't build enough houses because of zoning choices.

Which is it?
Here's where @DKThomp is wildly inconsistent.

Either there are restrictions on supply in Dallas driving up housing prices, or there aren't. Thompson wants to have it both ways. Image
Image
@DKThomp I'd also note that he mischaracterized the argument, which is about financing and not antitrust. And he didn't address most of the evidence, or the purchase of housing by investors. He also misrepresented at least one of the people he interviewed.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(