Please read the website carefully and use the website to apply. Please don't use email since your application might get lost and it is a lot of extra work for us. But you can ask me/us questions using email (see site).
NEON research accelerates the energy transition with a focus on solar, wind, electric mobility, MAAS and smart grids and using a team with many different competencies that will work closely together with each other and with companies and governments. neonresearch.nl/solutions/
Every Friday we come together in Eindhoven (virtually for now) to learn from each other and motivate each other. We end the week / start the weekend with music and drinks.
But of course people of the 20 partner companies are also welcome and every month the Friday is a mini-conference with presentation to and from partners.
The idea is also to use these presentations to eventually create a global transition course. neonresearch.nl/partners/
Every year we produce a report and (more importantly) an online model that shows cost effective pathways to a renewable future. At the kick-off a member of the Dutch parliament already indicated that he and his colleagues would LOVE to use that.
Let's not exaggerate: a lot of the practical work within NEON will still be writing papers that are primarily relevant for a specific domain or discipline. But the explicit purpose is that the PhDs together create societally relevant pathways that accelerate the transition.
That's the kind of "purpose driven movement" you would become part of when you get a PhD position within NEON. And we aim to grow further so we can make a BIG difference! Please apply when that appeals to you!
And usually I don't spam on Twitter but it is *really* important that we find the smartest and most motivated people for NEON.
So I would like the tagged & following people to consider a retweet. (You can simply mute this discussion if you don't want to see notifications!)
Interesting new paper documents clearly how the IAEA has been overestimating the growth of nuclear time and time again. It's the inverse of what I've documented for solar and batteries. doi.org/10.1016/j.erss…
For PV you may know my graph (that was updated by - among others - carbon brief, the economist and Al Gore).
It shows reality (yearly PV sales) quickly increasing while IEA predictions keep denying it.
The nuclear graph is the inverse: predictions keep skyrocketing and reality doesn't budge.
It's similar to a recent paper I wrote on how battery price developments are continuously underestimated by experts. The left graph shows how expert predictions for prices in 2030 get lower as time goes on. nature.com/articles/s4433…
The final report on the Iberia Peninsula (Spain and Portugal) blackout is out.
A lot of people will be blaming renewables and talk about inertia. But the cause was bad voltage control and that's surprisingly easy to fix. Let me explain. entsoe.eu/publications/b…
The chair of the ENTSO-E (European grid operators) board Damián Cortinas stated at the press conference: "The problem is not renewable energy, but voltage control, regardless of the type of generation." sciencemediacentre.es/en/final-black…
You have to understand that traditionally, grids were managed largely through frequency control. If the frequency went down that meant more demand than supply. So you quickly burned more fossil fuels. If the frequency went up you burned less. Simple.
Bjoern talks about "spinning masses" to keep frequency constant, as if that's super important.
And in the old grid it is.
That's why I compare the old grid to a record player.
Here's a longer thread with details.
It has a sub-thread on Spain.
But the new grid has what I call digital power transformers (DPTs).
Basically a computer chip is driving a couple of power transistors. It works like a digital amplifier or your new and light laptop charger. energy-storage.news/demystifying-s…
Renewables also had a role: "tension was very high and sustained, causing the disconnection of generators".
An inside source tells me the voltage went above 110% in many places and solar was required to switch off, which meant 8GW was lost all at once.elpais.com/economia/2025-…
Let's start with some quantifiable facts. (Things this conservative armchair energy philosopher is allergic to.)
First thing we notice is that solar and wind are clearly surpassing nuclear (though the new leadership of the department of energy denies it).