If you're under 50, your odds of dying if you contract COVID-19 is ~0.013% or 1 in 8000. This is similar to the odds of dying in a car accident in a year.
BUT many infected people will go on to infect others. In this thread I'll explain why we cannot treat the two risks equally.
The current Rt for the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the US is ~1. This means that an infected person will infect, on average, 1 other person. That person will infect another, and so on.
After 3 months, ~20 people will have been infected that can be indirectly attributed to the 1st case.
If Rt increases to 1.2, then 130 people will have been infected after 3 months. All stemming from 1 infection.
The chance that at least 1 person among the 130 will die is non-trivial (~50%).
That's why we need to view COVID-19 as a *community risk*, not an *individual risk*.
If you are young and healthy, then yes, you will most likely not die if you contract COVID-19. If you transmit it to someone else, chances are they will survive too.
But what about the next person? Or the one after that? They may not be as young as you.
So I hope we can all agree that we can do a better job of protecting ourselves and others.
If simple actions such as wearing a mask can reduce even a single infection, that can stop a whole chain of transmission. There is widespread scientific consensus:
Due to this superspreading nature of the virus, effective contact tracing is key to mitigating the spread by tracking down superspreader events and notifying the exposed contacts in a timely manner.
Targeted testing and fast turnarounds are crucial.
So to conclude, we should not be thinking about Covid risks from an individual perspective, but rather from a community perspective. Our actions directly and indirectly affect those around us.
If I was able to change just one person's view with this thread, then it was worth it.
UPDATE: I find it interesting that my most controversial Tweet was "we can all do better to protect ourselves and others, such as wearing masks."
A common response? "But lockdown kills."
The two are not remotely related and it has shown how polarized our beliefs have become.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People were worried cases would spike further when the UK lifted almost all remaining restrictions in July. The opposite happened.
We must acknowledge that restrictions aren't all that effective in Western countries.
(Except Australia, who just entered their 6th lockdown)
It's interesting that some experts would rather question the accuracy of the data than acknowledge this reality.
Many bad papers looked at these curves in 2020 & concluded that more restrictions is followed by a decline in cases, when the decline would've happened regardless.
If we apply the same flawed logic here, one can say that the lifting of restrictions is followed by fewer cases.
Of course, the modeling isn’t perfect & never will be. But this ensemble of forecasts coming from 250+ researchers has helped add clarity for many over the past year.
The CDC deserves credit for taking a conscious, hands-off approach on this.
That said, I do think there's too much focus on modeling cases/deaths. For ex, I've haven't seen many efforts on vaccination forecasts or infections/immunity estimates.
There may be some reluctance in the general scientific community to do this, so it's hard to blame one entity.
Is containing COVID-19 a requirement for preserving the economy? My analysis suggests: probably not.
In the US, there is no correlation between Covid deaths & changes in unemployment rates.
However, blue states are much more likely to have higher increases in unemployment.
🧵
We can dive deeper by looking at levels of restrictions in each state, using the Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT).
More restrictions in a state is NOT correlated with fewer COVID-19 deaths.
However, more restrictions IS correlated with higher unemployment.
The most interesting data point is South Dakota.
As the only state to never order closures of restaurants, bars & retail, SD actually saw a 0.5% DECREASE in unemployment since the pandemic started. It also never ordered a mask mandate.