🇨🇦 You can follow the progress of #billc6 to ban 'conversion therapy' at this link. parl.ca/LegisInfo/Bill…
The bill is the same wording as Bill C8 from the last session with all the multiple drafting flaws. While Minister of Justice @MinJusticeEn David Lametti has been /2
that the bill is not intended to criminalize private conversations or expressions of opinions, he has not been very clear on what it does ban. Everyone is agreeing that certain forms of conversion therapy' very band and should be banned but nobody can say what they are. /3
This is not acceptable when you are talking about criminal laws which carry a maximum penalty of give years in prison. Is there anyone in the government who can give a concrete example of a practice that the bill will ban or an example of a practice that is permitted? /4
For example, would it be acceptable for a therapist to recommend that a teenager for cross sex hormones because he or she had autism spectrum issues which had not been explored. What about a blood condition that might make hormone treatment dangerous? genderreport.ca/gender-dysphor…
/5
Some of the drafting is just thoughtless. There is a blanket ban on any attempt to reduce or repress non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behavior. The plain meaning of these words would ban therapy for minor attracted person or someone with a harmful sexual fetish. /6
The bill defines conversion therapy as changing gender identity to "cisgender." How do non-binary, agender, gender fluid or any of the hundreds of other possible gender identities fit into this wording? How will this language impact therapy for detransitioners who want to /7
re-identify which their natal sex? Did anyone in the government consider these issues? Will anyone in Parliament consider them before the bill is passed?
Please note that I do not equate being LGBT with pedophilia. The bill fails to make this distinction. At minimum, it needs to be amended to permit therapy to repress or reduce sexual behaviuor which is harmful or unlawful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
WPATH can't catch a break. Even though the ACLU agreed to dismiss Boe v Marshall, where it challenged the Alabama law banning medical transition of minors, a federal judge has just ordered that more of the documents WPATH disclosed be made public. /2
Many of the documents produced by WPATH were subject to a protective order and could not be published but the judge ruled that recordings or WPATH and USPATH conferences and panel discussions were not confidential and were not covered by the order. /3 reason.com/volokh/2025/06…
Although WPATH was not a party to the case, the judge ordered it to produce documents relating to its standards of care as they were the basis of the plaintiff's claim that gender affirming treatments were medically necessary. /4justdad7180.substack.com/p/boe-v-marsha…
1/ The report of the Quebec Comité de sages sur l'identité de genre is out. It is over 200 pages in French only so it will take me some time to review. The recommendations are modest and often vague but do represented some small progress. Link is in the next Tweet.
2/ The report consists of two volumes and a summary. This is a summary of the summary. The links are on this page:quebec.ca/gouvernement/m…
3/ The first chapter discusses the evolution of the phenomenon of gender identity. It is clear that sex is binary but it does get intersex wrong. Here are the recommendations with an English translation by Deepl.
1/ The Canadian Medical Association is challenging Alberta legislation restricting pediatric medical transition on the grounds that it violates the Charter by restricting physician's freedom of conscience.
2/ The Alberta law bans puberty blockers, limits cross sex hormones to patients over 18 and surgery to those over 18. It is part of a larger package that covers social transition in schools and sports. justdad7180.substack.com/p/alberta-chal…
3/ The issue of doctors' freedom of conscience was considered in Canada when a group of Christian doctors challenged a regulation requiring them to refer patients who wanted medically assisted death to a doctor who did not object to this practice. canadianlutheran.ca/christian-doct…
1/ The plaintiffs in the challenge to the Alabama law restricting medical transition of minors have agreed to drop the case. Boe v. Marshall has probably done more to undermine the case for WPATH and pediatric gender medicine than any other legal action.
2/ The masterstroke by the Alabama Attorney General was to bring a motion to compel the World Professional Association for Transgender Health to produce the correspondence relating to the creation of its SOC8. justdad7180.substack.com/p/boe-v-marsha…
3/ What WPATH produced was a whole arsenal of smoking guns which disclosed the political manipulation of the standards of care and shredded what remained of WPATH's reputation as a trustworthy clinical and scientific organization.
1/ Some good news from the UK. The @Sullivan_Review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender will likely have a wider effect on breaking the destructive hold of gender ideology than the Cass Review.
@Sullivan_Review 2/ The review is a comprehensive rejection of the ideas and assumptions behind gender ideology. You can read the full report and an executive summary here. assets.publishing.service.gov.ukgov.uk/government/pub…
@Sullivan_Review 3/ The basic premise of the review is that sex and gender identity are both important factors in people's lives but they are separate and government agencies need to record them separately.
1/ The BC College of Nurses and Nurse Midwives (which recently found Amy Hamm (@preta_6) is not getting much love on Google. It has a one star rating and the first review reads, "The staff are very unprofessional and boderline abusive."
@preta_6 2/ If you sort the reviews by date, the most recent review (from a month ago) is a five star review but after that the reviews are overwhelmingly negative. Out if 161 reviews I could only find 2 other positive reviews and 10 ratings that were above 1 star.
@preta_6 3/ There were repeated complaints about rude staff, cumbersome bureaucracy and fees that were excessive in respect of other provinces. All of these reviews predated the Amy Hamm decision and some of them go back to before the complaint was filed.