🇨🇦 You can follow the progress of #billc6 to ban 'conversion therapy' at this link. parl.ca/LegisInfo/Bill…
The bill is the same wording as Bill C8 from the last session with all the multiple drafting flaws. While Minister of Justice @MinJusticeEn David Lametti has been /2
that the bill is not intended to criminalize private conversations or expressions of opinions, he has not been very clear on what it does ban. Everyone is agreeing that certain forms of conversion therapy' very band and should be banned but nobody can say what they are. /3
This is not acceptable when you are talking about criminal laws which carry a maximum penalty of give years in prison. Is there anyone in the government who can give a concrete example of a practice that the bill will ban or an example of a practice that is permitted? /4
For example, would it be acceptable for a therapist to recommend that a teenager for cross sex hormones because he or she had autism spectrum issues which had not been explored. What about a blood condition that might make hormone treatment dangerous? genderreport.ca/gender-dysphor…
/5
Some of the drafting is just thoughtless. There is a blanket ban on any attempt to reduce or repress non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behavior. The plain meaning of these words would ban therapy for minor attracted person or someone with a harmful sexual fetish. /6
The bill defines conversion therapy as changing gender identity to "cisgender." How do non-binary, agender, gender fluid or any of the hundreds of other possible gender identities fit into this wording? How will this language impact therapy for detransitioners who want to /7
re-identify which their natal sex? Did anyone in the government consider these issues? Will anyone in Parliament consider them before the bill is passed?
Please note that I do not equate being LGBT with pedophilia. The bill fails to make this distinction. At minimum, it needs to be amended to permit therapy to repress or reduce sexual behaviuor which is harmful or unlawful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The authors of the Canadian Paediatric Society position statement on gender affirming care have now published a response to the recent letter to the editor calling for a review of the position statement in light of the Cass Review. academic.oup.com/pch/advance-ar…
2/ The response repeats falsehoods such as the claim that the systematic reviews commissioned by the Cass Review excluded studies which were not randomized control trials when in fact the systematic reviews considered and evaluated all types of studies. cass.independent-review.uk/home/publicati…
3/ The response relies heavily on a critique of the Cass Review by Dr. Meredithe McNamara et al. distributed by the "Yale Integrity Project." The first peer reviewed rebuttal to this paper has just been published. adc.bmj.com/content/early/…
1/ The proposals by @ABDanielleSmith to protect gender-questioning youth in schools and healthcare are generally consistent with best international practice and evidence but there are still a few problem areas. .
@ABDanielleSmith 2/ Banning gender reassignment surgery on minors should be a non-issue. Activists claim it never happens but it does. Someone too young to get a tattoo shouldn't be able to get an elective double mastectomy. nationalpost.com/news/young-det…
@ABDanielleSmith 3/ The proposal to restrict puberty blockers and cross sex hormones to children over 16 is close the the current policies in England, Sweden and Finland. These countries do make an exemption for patients enrolled in a research program.segm.org/Swedish-2022-t…
1/ The Trevor Project study which claims that "anti-transgender" laws caused increases in suicide attempts among trans and non-binary youth is a flawed study that is being presented in a misleading and irresponsible way.
2/ The 72% increase in suicide attempts highlighted in the press release misrepresents data in the study which refers to an increase of 72% above the sample mean. Also, the methodology used cannot prove causation.
3/ The actual results are all inconsistent. The study reports 18 results and found 6 which were not statistically significant, 2 which were negative and 2 where the increase was less than 10% above the sample mean.
1/ The Department for Education in England no longer recognizes the concept of a trans child. The latest version of it statutory guidance on keeping children safe in schools has replaced LGBT with LGB and
gender questioning children. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66cef97c…
2/ Compare with the 2023 statutory guidance which simply referred to "children who are LGBT" as a group and talks about the need for staff to provide a "safe space." web.archive.org/web/2024082215…
3/ The shift in language is significant because it rejects the trans activist strategy of conflating gender identity and sexual orientation as well as the view that children who question there gender are automatically "trans" if they say so.
1/ This has not been a good year for the World Professional Association for Transgender Health @WPATH. It began with the news that its membership had plummeted by 60% over a year. criticaltherapyantidote.org/2024/01/17/bre…
@wpath 2/ In March, the WPATH Files by Mia Hughes (@_CryMiaRiver) exposed internal discussions which showed WPATH members' disregard for science and medical ethics.
@wpath @_CryMiaRiver 3/ In April, the Cass Review concluded that the WPATH SOC8 was not reliable clinical guideline and could not recommend using it in the UK.
1/ A recent critique of the Cass Review exposes the real agenda of the activist clinicians supporting gender affirming care. They don't care about evidence based medicine because their case for GAC has nothing to do with promoting good health.
2/ This is made clear in this paragraph which argues that "evaluating the efficacy of GAC based on psycho social well-being is misguided." In the authors view, looking for mental health benefits from GAC involves pathologizing "transness."
3/ The article draws heavily on an argument by Florence Ashley, who is a co-author, that GAC should be treated in the same way as reproductive health. These arguments were refuted in a recent article by @GorinMoti onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ha…