Eli Tyre Profile picture
Oct 2, 2020 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
I'm reminded of a comment that I made in reading Joseph Campbell years ago: the east has inner peace, but the west invented freedom.
In the west we suffer, we have to deal with sin, we have to take responsibility for our lives and for choosing well.

All of which flourishes in the enlightenment into the idea of political freedom and self-determination.
In the east, there are paths to transcending suffering and escaping the cycle of death and rebirth.

All that is expected of you is that you comport yourself appropriately for each of your social roles. (Extreme example: caste systems.)
Going by Vervaeke, it seems like free will was invented in the Axial age with the idea of an open, influence-able future.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eli Tyre

Eli Tyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EpistemicHope

Feb 6
All this sounds basically right to me, and, comports with my own (not yet published) personal ethics, modulo that (to speak in the language Scott is using here, which is not my usual language) we TOTALLY have implicit obligations to animals.

Why wouldn't we?
"If animals are conscious...we probably don't have obligations to them, because we never signed any treaties."

...but also...
"You're obligated to take care of your kids, because you accepted an implicit promise to do so by giving birth to them."

...is a very weird juxtaposition.
Read 20 tweets
Jan 26
This was fascinating (and slightly horrifying). I'd love to read more accounts of the sociological-economic dynamics of "worlds" that I have little exposure to.

aella.substack.com/p/how-onlyfans…
This part in particular was thought-provoking.

"Feminine norms" are at least partially rooted in female psychology, but they're also just an adaption to being on the more-in-demand side of a competitive market with non-fixed supply, that thrives on impulsivity. Image
The non-fixed supply and then impulsivity are both important to get feminine norms.

Landlords are on the more-in-demand side of their markets, but they respond to that by charging higher rents. That's not enough to create feminine norms.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 14
FYI, humans can learn to notice the feeling of confabulating or rationalizing, with a little bit of practice.

You do have to have an honest interest in noticing when it's happening though.
It helps for building the habit if you make an unobtrusive but distinct gesture every time you notice it.
One common form of rationalization for me is what I call "telling stories", where I'm justifying a feeling or position I'm holding to some (often imagined, sometimes in-person) audience.

This feels notably different from simply explaining what/why I'm feeling or what I think.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 9
In the GTF (if we get there), we'll regularly do mental operations that take thousands of symbols.

We'll think it is utterly bizarre and horrifying that the biological bootloader beings (us) could only only do mental operations on ~4 symbols at a time.
This is an insane bottleneck.
How many thoughts are we not able to think, because they would require consciously holding in mind the specific relationships between just _10_ concepts, where you can't do it by chunking because the way each concept relates to the others depends all the rest?
Read 8 tweets
Jan 8
I am very libertarian, but have become somewhat more conservative overtime in this sense:

I think it sensible for "society" to try to set social default norms that are healthy and sustainable.

But there HAVE to be ways for people to opt out of that if it doesn't work for them.
In fact, those things go together.

If there are ways for people to quietly opt out of the defaults, they don't have to rebel against those norms to create space for themselves to live lives that work for them.
I could totally imagine that poly works badly for most people society would be better off if it were generally socially discouraged.

But some people are obviously-to-me very dispoistionally poly—it actually does work better for them.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 5
I consider myself to "do philosophy", though what I mean by that has very little to do with academic philosophy or the "great philosophers" who I agree are mostly bad (with a few exceptions), except as examples of how different one’s worldview can be from what I take for granted.
By "philosophy" I mean "reflecting on the abstractions we use to make sense of and act in the world."
Philosophy is the domain that involves reflecting _on_ abstractions, reasoning about whether and where a particular abstraction is correct or useful, or whether and where a different abstraction would be better, etc.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(