Eli Tyre Profile picture
Oct 2, 2020 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
I'm reminded of a comment that I made in reading Joseph Campbell years ago: the east has inner peace, but the west invented freedom.
In the west we suffer, we have to deal with sin, we have to take responsibility for our lives and for choosing well.

All of which flourishes in the enlightenment into the idea of political freedom and self-determination.
In the east, there are paths to transcending suffering and escaping the cycle of death and rebirth.

All that is expected of you is that you comport yourself appropriately for each of your social roles. (Extreme example: caste systems.)
Going by Vervaeke, it seems like free will was invented in the Axial age with the idea of an open, influence-able future.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eli Tyre

Eli Tyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EpistemicHope

Jun 25
I think this view of society comes from a human egalitarian impulse, in two ways.
1) Society is stratified. Some people are in fact much better off and afforded real privileges and opportunities that others have less access to. Those privileges are an existence proof that "society" can be like a beneficent parent to at least some people.
Seeing that, one might ask, why them and not us?
Read 10 tweets
Jun 18
So it seems like one way that the world could go is:

- China develops a domestic semiconductor fab industry that's not at the cutting edge, but close, so that it's less dependent on Taiwan's TSMC
- China invades Taiwan, destroying TSMC, ending up with a compute advantage...
...over.the US which translates into a military advantage

- (which might or might not actually be leveraged in a hot war).
I could imagine China building a competent domestic chip industry. China seems more determined to do that than the US is.
Read 9 tweets
May 19
So, my short summary of planet earth is 1) we're building superintelligence without knowing what we're doing and 2) we're torturing ~100 billion non-human animals every single moment.

The moral scale of those things is so large as to dwarf pretty much everything else.
There are a few other things that matter, but mostly because they impact one of those two things.

But I think maybe I should be seriously considering that training / running ML models is painful, as a third thing on the list?
I don't think it's remotely comparable to factory farming in terms of scale of suffering yet. But it's hard to tell when we'll cross that line, because it's hard to compare them with brains.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 23
Does anyone know what the argument is for the retention breath segment of Wim Hof breathing is?

It seems to me, based on the proposed mechanism, you should get all the benefits (and more so?) from straight up hyperventilating, without any breath hold at all.
Does anyone know the claimed reason why holding your breath helps?
The argument that I've heard is that this causes a build up of CO2, which increases Oxygen Absorption by the cells.

And that's not...totally unreasonable. Higher acidity DOES cause hemoglobin molecules to release more oxygen on average.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_effe…
Read 7 tweets
Apr 12
Has their ever been a human culture that trained it's citizens in virtue, sufficiently, such that transparent flattery doesn't work on them?

This thought prompted by the ads in the airport, many of which have barely relevant flattering slogans.
dath ilani would shocked at that. The slogans are trying to hack your decision process and they're not even logically valid!

But has any real human culture done better?
There are also dogs in this airport. That's pretty great.

Fewer dumb ads, more dogs.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 21
I'm monogamous by nature. I've never wanted to be in a romantic relationship with more than one person.

But I've exclusively dated poly people, since the people I wanted to date were poly. And ~all my friends are poly.

So I've been pretty close to some poly relationships.
I'm exploring strategic "mainstream" dating right now. Seeing about meeting people on bumble, and so on.

I've been surprised by how strong the negative reaction to poly is.
Not just "that's not what I want, personally", which makes total sense.

But there's a derision ("grow up already") or something like triggered-disgust?
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(