Maya Forstater Profile picture
Oct 2, 2020 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The Law Society's new template on transition is big on "gender expression" and plays down medical transition.

This is all about celebrating cross dressers in the office

It throws open the doors of women's changing areas and toilets to male colleagues who wish to use them if they feel more comfortable.

They don't have to identify as women, or be undergoing any medical treatment. Just declaring themselves non-binary would be enough.
It tells law firms to pledge to "exceed" the Equality Act 2010 & Gender Recognition Act.

No mention of checking whether this might undermine their adherence to the law on sex discrimination, disability discrimination, race and religious discrimination, or sexual harassment.
If a female lawyer complains that she feels uncomfortable undressing with, or having enforced girly bathroom chats with, or being called "cis" by her male colleague ... well that might be harassment.

Any chance of a female only meeting or group to discuss policies is off.
Woe betide anyone who succumbs to "cisnormativity" (i.e. recognising that sex is real, binary, immutable and that sex matters)
They say this will help firms meet the @sra_solicitors code on equality, diversity & inclusion.

This policy puts the decision of a man to wear a dress to work feel comfortable in the women's toilets over the privacy, dignity and freedom of belief of every body else.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

Jul 27
A thread about academic freedom, sex and gender.

This is not the only topic where university VCs have not defended academic freedom strongly enough, but it is a very good demonstration of the problem.

@bphillipsonMP
Prof @Docstockk was hounded out of @SussexUni
She has been waiting for 3 years for the results of an @officestudents investigation

theguardian.com/education/2021…
Prof @JoPhoenix1 was canceled by @Uni_of_Essex & hounded out of @OpenUniversity

368 colleagues signed a public letter calling OU GC Research Network transphobic.

OU was found liable for 25 counts of belief discrimination and harassment

sex-matters.org/posts/updates/…
Read 37 tweets
May 7
I am blocked by the independent legal advisor to the OU's post-Phoenix review 😱.

Could she be using TERFBlocker?
Image
She is very keen on pronouns


Image
Image
Image
Image
And the idea of children born in the wrong body ...

Image
Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Apr 10
Stonewall are reverse ferreting saying they agree with the Cass Review Image
Remember what they said before:

- hormone blockers pay a vital role in healthcare for "trans children"

web.archive.org/web/2024032909…
Image
Children should be given hormone blockers on the basis they are "reversible" without having to understand the impact of the whole course of treatment Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 3
Here we are.

Stonewall recognizes that "misgendering" is something like "criticising religion"

Is it criminal to criticise religion ? ❌

Is it harassment to criticize religion? ❌

Would it be lawful for an employer to require staff never to criticize religion? ❌
This is the same Stonewall which has trained the police forces that think "misgendering" is criminal.

The same Stonewall that never stepped in to say it wasn't, as people were arrested. Image
The same Stonewall that reported Allison Bailey to her chambers for misgendering. Image
Read 11 tweets
Apr 1
On March 13 2024 I made a complaint to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office about Master McCloud, a serving judge who has been engaging publicly and inappropriately in debates on sex and gender.

forstater.com/the-judge-to-w…
The judge (who remains in post) had been posting on Linked in as "Judge in the High Court" ... The Judicial Conduct Standards say don't do this. Image
Demonstrating hostility towards people with gender critical beliefs... The Judicial Conduct Standards say don't do this. Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 20
This is just wow 🤯 Image
They conducted a survey which asked their members if the expression of gender critical beliefs creates a hostile environment for them Image
Their members compared recognizing that being a woman and being a trans-identifying man are different with apartheid Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(