Here's some science on covid-19, as we understand it now.
People tend to be most contagious in the 2 days before they show symptoms.
For Trump aide Hope Hicks, that appears to be Monday and Tuesday of this week.
For Trump, that appears to be Tuesday and Wednesday.
2/ Both Hicks & Trump met with a dozen or more people over those days, while very contagious. With no masks, per the preference of Trump.
That put — among others — Joe Biden & Chris Wallace at risk during the debate (indoors, 90+ minutes, no masks).
3/ Meanwhile, as you hear of VP Pence and his wife, of Pompeo, for instance, testing negative, one important caveat:
This is a moment not for the antigen quick-tests but for PCR testing.
Why?
The quick-tests are very reliable if you are positive. You are likely infected.
4/ But the quick-tests have a gap — if you test negative, there is a significant chance (10%+) of a 'false negative.'
That means you are told you don't have the virus, but you might. The quick tests can even show 'negative' for several tests in a row, even if you have the virus.
5/ The President announced to the world that he is infected with the deadly coronavirus via a tweet.
It's a moment for a White House medical briefing — calm, with physicians and officials, not battling reporters, but answering questions.
Should be this morning.
6/ Simple question 1: Is the President experiencing illness, symptoms? Is the First Lady experiencing symptoms?
Note: The White House did not announce Hope Hicks being covid-positive. That came from @JenniferJJacobs of Bloomberg.
The White House won't say if Trump has symptoms.
7/ Given the number of senior people Trump & Hicks — alone — come in contact with each day, this has the potential to be a 'super-spreader' event across the top level of the federal government.
Fascinating element of Harvard's refusal to buckle to the Trump Administration today.
Who are Harvard's lawyers in this matter?
#1 is Robert K. Hur.
Sound familiar? Trump named him US Attorney for Maryland.
—>
2/ Then Robert Hur was the special counsel who investigated Pres. Biden's mishandling of classified documents. Hur as the one who said Biden was 'an elderly man with a poor memory.' And declined to charge Biden.
That's Harvard lawyer #1.
—>
3/ Harvard lawyer #2 is William A. Burck.
Currently a member of the Board of Directors of Fox Corp., the owner of FoxNews.
Burck served as special counsel to the Republican House task force that investigated the attempted assassination of Pres. Trump.
Could Trump's tariffs spark a US factory & manufacturing renaissance?
Let's say they do.
Here's the problem, even if we double the number of factories the US has now. Even if we—somehow—start making microwave ovens and pleated-front chinos and pillow cases in the US again.
—>
2/ There won't be many jobs.
Factory automation for routine, repetitive manufacturing is very far along.
It's so widespread that there's a phrase in the manufacturing world:
'Lights-out factories.'
…Factories with so few people, they keep the lights off.
—>
3/ Machines don't need lights. So many big companies—including consumer products companies like Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Foxconn—run factories with just a scattering of staff who monitor the machines.
Like in a quiet office, the lights only come on when a person walks in.
Here's the thing that might happen with Trump's tariffs.
It's not 1893. It's not 1933.
We—the United States—have spent 50 years creating a web of global trade, an interwoven global economy.
Now, Trump is using garden shears to cut the US out of that network.
—>
2/ We've been the indispensable trade partner—the US is 26% of global GDP, and a great place to sell your stuff. We have well-off consumers with plenty of disposable income.
But if Trump is unbending, the world could simply comply—and trade among themselves.
—>
3/ We are 26% of the global market. But that means 74% of the global market is out there without us.
Including all of the EU, whose unified economy is almost the size of the US, with similar consumers. And the Chinese economy.
On the bridge of the container ship Dali, 4 minutes from disaster, there's one critical moment we haven't heard about yet.
The very moment the ship lost power the 1st time.
What did the pilot do, right then?
His first thought, apparently, was safety — the bridge looming ahead.
—>
⤵️ NTSB photo of the bridge of the Dali...
2/ The 1st 'event' leading up to the collision that the NTSB notes in its timeline is 1:24:59—when alarms on the bridge indicate power failure.
The ship was without electricity, engine power, lights, navigation, radio.
Dali was dark, literally & in terms of communications.
—>
3/ The first thing the pilot did — apparently within the first 30 to 60 seconds of the ship going dark — was take out his cell phone and call harbor pilot dispatch.
He told his dispatcher: We've lost power, close the bridge. Close the bridge.