Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
Oct 2, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Good morning.

In December, a NY judge tossed Manhattan DA Vance's charges against Paul Manafort on double jeopardy grounds.

An appeal of that decision being heard this morning.

I'll be covering it live for @CourthouseNews.

Background, @jruss_jruss: courthousenews.com/new-yorks-frau…
Rather, I'll be covering it virtually, live.

The public can listen in here, but a number of other appeals go first this morning before Manafort.

Watch:
The Manafort appeal beginning now.

Valerie Figueredo is arguing for Vance's office.

Judge Dianne Renwick asks right away about double jeopardy.
The video feed appears to have cut off for me.
Not just for me, apparently.

The feed crashed, and along with it, public access to this hearing. Standby.
This alternate link works:

wowza.nycourts.gov/ad1/ad1.php

Todd Blanche is up for Manafort.
The judges appear so far to be skeptical of DA Vance's appeal.

Judge Jeffrey Oing: "They’ve got enough to get an indictment, and they’re doing a pivot to get to the double jeopardy."
Todd Blanche: "At the end of the day, there are hard cases and there are easy cases, but this is not a hard case."

The panel does not appear to question that proposition that the double jeopardy argument is an easy call, and the argument goes back to Vance's counsel.
Judge Dianne Renwick asks Figueredo: So you’re saying this is a legislative issue, not one for us?

Figueredo replies that the charges the mortgage fraud allegations are very different from bank fraud.

The hearing abruptly ends without a ruling.
Context: Judge Renwick's question about the "legislative issue" went to the NY Legislature tightening double-jeopardy standards.

Background here: courthousenews.com/pardon-loophol…

A NY judge found that, even with that change, double jeopardy applied.

That's what's on appeal.
The judges ended the hearing without a ruling.

Story ahead.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

Nov 7
Rudy Giuliani is in federal court now.

He was order to appear after the Georgia election workers he defamed say he "secreted away" assets from his N.Y. apartment — and reportedly went to Trump's polling station in a Mercedes convertible ordered to be turned over to them. Image
Image
The hearing has begun.

Attorney for Giuliani: Ken Caruso.

For Ga. election workers Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman: Aaron Nathan
Nathan:

Giuliani disclosed new bank accounts opened in July 2024.

On Aug. 30, Giuliani and his associates opened up a new entity: Standard USA LLC, over which he has +80% ownership interest.

"Suffice it to say, it's troubling that we learned about it on Monday for the first time."
Read 15 tweets
Oct 17
A Georgia judge has VOIDED several rules passed by the GOP-dominated State Election Board.

The Georgia GOP reportedly plans to appeal, per @Bluestein.

I'll break down the now-stricken rules in a thread below, summarizing the ruling linked here. 🔗 assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2…
1) 183-1-12-.02(c.2):

This rule would have allowed county board members to conduct a "reasonable inquiry" of election results, an undefined power they previously never had and was the purview of the courts.

Background here. justsecurity.org/100005/electio…
2) 183-1-12-.12:

The so-called "examination rule," granting county board members access to "all election related documentation."

That and the reasonable inquiry rule are both challenged in a still-pending lawsuit before another judge.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 2
Good morning from New York.

Mayor Eric Adams has just entered the courtroom for a hearing in his federal corruption case.
"All rise."

U.S. District Judge Dale Ho is presiding.
Ho sets the agenda for today's hearing, including a trial date.
Read 17 tweets
Sep 5
Good morning from Washington, D.C.

After a long hiatus, Trump’s election subversion case is slated for another status conference.

The scene outside the courthouse this morning.

I’ll cover the proceedings live at 10 a.m. ET. Image
"All rise."

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan takes the bench.

Proceedings are about to begin.
For the gov't: Prosecutor Thomas Windom
For the defense: John Lauro

Judge Chutkan: "It's been almost a year. You look rested, Mr. Lauro."

Lauro cracks that life seemed "meaningless" without seeing the judge.

Chutkan: (laughter) "Enjoy it while it lasts!"
Read 31 tweets
Aug 27
NEWS:

Jack Smith just filed a superseding indictment against Trump.

Prosecutors say the new indictment "reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions in Trump v. United States."

Doc storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Note for those unfamiliar:

A superseding indictment replaces an existing indictment.

There are no new charges in today's indictment against Trump here, only the same four leveled against him in connection with the 2020 election, tailored to pass the Supreme Court's new test.
Today's news does, however, mean that another grand jury that did not see the evidence earlier put their stamp on the same charges.

On a quick glance, the latest indictment is shorter, and nixes DOJ-related claims that wouldn't have survived the immunity ruling.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 11
Just in:

Trump's lawyers filed a motion to vacate his 34 felony convictions and dismiss his New York indictment.

In the wake of SCOTUS's immunity ruling, they argue that certain testimony and evidence shouldn't have been introduced at trial, like the categories shown here. Image
DA Bragg's deadline to respond to Trump's arguments is July 24.
A few thoughts on this:

Trump's lawyers are not just challenging his convictions, based on the alleged use of "official-acts evidence."

Since prosecutors brought some of this evidence to the grand jury, they want his indictment thrown out too.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(