"After seeing the pyramid, all other architecture seems but pastry."
Herman Melville at Giza (Journal Of A Visit To Europe And The Levant 1856-1857)
"The tearing away of the casing, though it removed enough stone to build a walled-town, has not subtracted from its apparent magnitude. It has had the contrary effect."
In January 1857 Melville makes it to Palestine.
"A delightful ride across Plain of Sharon [really plain of Philistia] to Jaffa. Quantities of red poppies."
Melville at Jaffa: "From the top of it, I see the Mediterranean, the Plain, the mountains of Ephraim. A lovely landscape."
But
"I am emphatically alone, & begin to feel like Jonah."
In which Melville meets a mezuzah -- apparently for the first time -- in his Jaffa hotel.
Melville makes an interesting reference to "strata" of cities under present-day Jerusalem!
(By 1857 it had become common to talk about past Jerusalem as buried below, but this is the 1st time I've seen this word appear.)
Melville's mention of remains 40 feet below the surface might refer to those uncovered during the construction of Christ Church near Jaffa Gate in the 1840s -- an even often mentioned in subsequent accounts.
Melville's failed attempts to understand Palestine (and Jews) continue.
He adds: "Besides, the number of Jews in Palestine is comparatively small. And how are the hosts of them scattered in other lands to be brought here? Only by a miracle."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why this story?
As far as I know, there are no other news articles on this, not even from any Israeli news outlets.
Instead, it looks like Live Science just browsed the IAA journal Atiqot for a news story publications.iaa.org.il/atiqot/vol117/…
Why does Live Science have this headline?
A 19th-century grave was found in the Negev (Naqab) with a woman and a child. Why frame it this way? Presumably because the story isn't actually newsworthy.
The headline for this was originally "Why did the Museum of the Bible have to return 17,000 ancient artifacts?", but then the Post discovered that 1000s were actually returned by Cornell & changed it
(The url and the Twitter card reflect the original) washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
Current headline:
It feels like the scandals of the last few years were a great opening for a better discussion of provenance & its importance, but I suspect many -- certainly the Washington Post -- would rather use it to mock evangelicals. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The strangeness of this article is perfectly symbolized by what looks like a fashion photoshoot featuring a BM curators with props. telegraph.co.uk/art/architectu…
h/t @PortantIssues
It's good that the article does not continue Simpson's insistence that looting in the Middle East mostly stopped after 2003-04.
How does Shaked/Ford/Bhayro's 2013 publication of the Schøyen Collection Aramaic incantation bowls deal with provenance? This is an interesting case, worth looking at a bit.
From the EBSCOhost ebook, it would seem the word "provenance" doesn't occur in the book . . .
Amazing that this is the full provenance statement for a Palmyrene funerary relief in a reputable academic journal in 2014 -- around the height of the Syrian Civil War.
To be fair, that's not quite it: in the footnote, the author thanks the gallery for permission to publish and for providing photos.
Also to be fair, it's better than this article from the same journal in the following year, where all we learn of the collection history of seven Palmyrene reliefs is that they're in "a private collection in Lebanon"
Much of the review is concerned with how archaeology is presented to the public.
Finley recognizes that, for all their flaws, 19th-century archaeologist-explorers had this down.