1/25: I’ve been told that some of the simple concepts I routinely share with Founders get adopted by their firms as “truths” (which is flattering). I was asked to outline a few of them in Tweet form. Unpacked:
2/25: One of my favorites is a concept called “0.8 to the 5th”. It’s an acknowledgment that contingent probabilities suck. If a business plan has many “ands” joining process steps to create outcomes then its stuck in the world of contingent probabilities.
3/25: Most businesses are complex with strings of three, four, and sometimes five or more dependencies linked together. The best Operator in the world only has in the ballpark of an 80% chance of hitting an aggressive goal if it’s one of many complex priorities on his/her plate.
4/25: While 80% sounds pretty good, when all of the goals are contingent on each other the chances of achieving the desired outcome are very low. The implications of 0.8 to the 5th are stunning and intimidating.
5/25: Having less than a 1 in 3 chance of hitting plan is not a fun statistic to stare at, and this is what one should expect from a World Class Operator. Average Operators don’t have a chance in this type of environment.
6/25: Reducing the chain of contingencies is a lot of what I help Founders think through. Investing in things that remove contingencies might look expensive but are usually cheap in retrospect. 0.8 to the 4th is a heck of a lot better than 0.8 to the 5th.
7/25: And what’s nice is that by reducing the number of battlefronts a management team is fighting on they should be able to increase the probability of accomplishing their other goals. So 0.8 to the 5th becomes 0.85 to the 4th becomes 0.9 to the 3rd, etc.
8/25: Eventually the business has a fighting chance of success, especially if everyone in the system has a maniacal focus on reducing contingencies and delivering on the tasks at hand. Detailed blog post with examples: fintechjunkie.com/2015/05/01/the…
9/25: Another favorite is the concept: “You can’t accelerate time.” The unfortunate truth is that most complex businesses can’t be cracked overnight and this is especially true if they require today’s investments to result in a stream of results that trickle in over time.
10/25: The return profile of money invested in originating customers today might take months, quarters, or even years to understand. Everyone likes to show quick progress but the cadence of growing certain types of businesses doesn’t always fit this profile.
11/25: If a business’s financial model suggests that the economics at month 12 or month 24 post-customer-acquisition matters, then the business needs to gather data over 12 or 24 months to gain confidence in its projections.
12/25: For some products there are ways of analyzing early performance results as a method for gaining comfort with future performance estimates, but many times these estimates are inherently flawed. And for the most complex products there is no substitute for real data.
13/25: You Can’t Accelerate Time. Full Stop. Moving quickly can work if the business is fungible and customers are understanding. Growing a business that requires making irreversible decisions before performance is well understood is equivalent to gambling with investor money.
14/25: To Founders - Before you become a steward of Investors’ money make sure you and your investors understand what the business will have learned before the money runs out.
15/25: If it isn’t enough, adjust the model accordingly or raise enough money to prove out the next series of critical assumptions. If you can’t do either then you’re likely dead before you start so don’t start.
16/25: To Investors - Before you invest in a complex, annuity oriented business, identify the critical assumptions that need to be proved out before the business is at “the next stage” and ask the Founder to pull together a plan that proves out these assumptions.
17/25: If you’re willing to fund this plan, great. If not, ask for the plan to be refined. But, you should avoid funding a business to get part-way to the next stage without expecting to write the next check yourself.
18/25: It’s better to just move on because a half-funded business will typically struggle. Tick tock, respect the clock! Detailed blog post: fintechjunkie.com/2016/07/18/you…
19/25: The next concept requires us to step back in history for a moment to the “Age of Sail”, a time in the 16th and 17th centuries when naval battles progressed from “grapple and board” combat tactics to battles resolved by “floating artillery.”
20/25: The most advanced weapon of the time was the cannon and for 200 years investments were made in its design and use. Why? If one ship had cannons that fired a small percent farther than those of another, it should win ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of the battles between them.
21/25: Minor improvements led to devastating advantage and justified investment in improvement. Many products and services behave in the same way. This is very true in financial services businesses for reasons that become apparent when the drivers of success are picked apart.
22/25: In lending businesses in particular, very small advantages can literally suck the oxygen out of a market and create havoc for the competitive landscape. Why? Because we live in a world of near perfect information and good customers generally make rational choices
23/25: While there are times that customers make choices based on “less quantifiable reasons”, it’s always good to ask and answer the question “If a rational consumer we’re faced with perfect information, would they choose your product?”
24/25: I ask this question all the time and use it to know when a company has a “reason to exist” when viewed from their target customers’ standpoint. Full blog post with examples: fintechjunkie.com/2015/04/07/let…
25/25: Lots more at fintechjunkie.com. Happy to summarize other generic concepts if requested! And remember that retweeting is the best encouragement that you can give!
Sorry for the typo —- “were” not “we’re”. Can’t edit tweets!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Frank Rotman

Frank Rotman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fintechjunkie

27 Nov
1/30: There’s a supply/demand imbalance in the startup world (too much capital/not enough great companies). This means it’s a great time to be a Founder if you have an epic idea, but how do you know if your idea is any good? I asked some amazing VCs and here’s their advice:
2/30: Put a prototype in users' hands. When you try to take it away from them, do they kick and scream and tell you to get lost? If so, you've got a good idea. If not, keep iterating. (@Mark_Goldberg)
3/30: Can you can describe it in 30 seconds or less to a tech-illiterate relative at Thanksgiving? Great ideas are simple, but non-obvious. (@Mark_Goldberg)
Read 30 tweets
19 Nov
1/30: Many #Startup CEOs struggle to redefine their own role as their company scales. I’ve been asked by startup CEOs many times: “What should my job be?” What follows is a framework I’ve used to guide various CEOs through the evolution from a “Small Team CEO” to a “Proper CEO”:
2/30: But, before I share the framework I almost universally have to re-set their expectations because most first time CEOs think that their primary function is to “make all critical decisions”. Breaking them out of a “control everything” mentality is uncomfortable but essential.
3/30: What’s disappointing is that many CEOs can’t wrap their heads around the thought that they won’t be directly involved in everything happening at their company and in the middle of all critical decisions. Only when they’re ready to deal with this they can evolve.
Read 30 tweets
10 Nov
1/32: Building a #StartUp business has similarities to a spacecraft crashing down on an unknown planet. I talk to Founders about this all the time. Unpacked:
2/32: We’ve all seen blockbuster “how the heck are we going to survive” SciFi movies. The one commonality is that there’s an obvious prioritization of what has to be solved and in what order.
3/32: This is because all human beings need 3 things to survive: Oxygen, Water and Food. Without any of them we can’t survive. But, bad things start to happen if we don’t have oxygen for 3 minutes, water for 3 days or food for 3 weeks.
Read 32 tweets
3 Nov
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I share that seems to resonate well with Entrepreneurs and Investors is what I call “Truth Files”. Unpacked:
2/29: So what is a “Truth File?” Simple definition: “A truth file contains data that without need of additional confirmation can be considered factual.” Not all truth files are 100% accurate and not all are valuable, but the best ones can be transformational.
3/29: The operative question that defines how valuable a truth file is: “What does the truth file reveal that can be used as a substitute for investigative work or help make more accurate decisions?” The first reduces friction and the second improves outcomes.
Read 29 tweets
26 Oct
1/15: Of all the questions I’m being asked on recent diligence calls about our companies, the most common is “What are the skills/gaps of the Founder(s)?” Given COVID, this has become an important topic so I thought it would be worth sharing how I think about the issue. Unpacked:
2/15: In every conversation I try to level-set the outsider and speak in “truisms” before diving into specifics. The first truism is that the skill set needed to run a high growth, disruptive start-up is multi-dimensional and that it’s about tradeoffs vs. insisting on completism.
3/15: We’d love if our Founders were world class on dimensions that include: Action orientation, ability to make decisions with limited/changing data, magnet for talent, ability to frame a business vision, and fundraising skills. These are just a few of the many important skills.
Read 15 tweets
16 Oct
1/42: What the heck is going on with the #fintech ecosystem’s obsession with Neo-Banks? Do they actually make sense in the US? Traditional Bankers say “absolutely not”. I say “they can”. Unpacked:
2/42: Because there’s so much confusion about the topic, it’s worth starting with a definitional statement about what a Neo-Bank is. One definition: A Neo-Bank is a COMPANY that offers a LIMITED SUITE OF BANKING PRODUCTS with NO OWNERSHIP OF BRANCH LOCATIONS.
3/42: COMPANY does not mean Bank. There are many forms and fashions of Neo-Banks but not many of them are actually Banks. It’s possible with today’s technological solutions for a non-Bank to offer Banking products.
Read 42 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!