1/6
Let's talk about the ingredients that went into this meal of a treatise (see below).
The authors cite @KimZetter in the endnotes 👍
@bontchev? No mentions at all.
@craiu? No mentions at all.
@mikko? No mentions ... and he's got "vigorish" in DoD!
Me? Yeah, no.
Let's talk about the ingredients that went into this meal of a treatise (see below).
The authors cite @KimZetter in the endnotes 👍
@bontchev? No mentions at all.
@craiu? No mentions at all.
@mikko? No mentions ... and he's got "vigorish" in DoD!
Me? Yeah, no.
https://twitter.com/WarOnTheRocks/status/1312326536645746688
2/6
There is a MAJOR BARRIER between "corporate #cybersecurity" that formed as an industry in the late 1980s
vs. "beltway bandits" who hijacked it for gov't funding in the late 1990s.
Fully a dozen years ago I warned DoD is "devolv[ing]" in cyberspace:
web.archive.org/web/2016032800…
There is a MAJOR BARRIER between "corporate #cybersecurity" that formed as an industry in the late 1980s
vs. "beltway bandits" who hijacked it for gov't funding in the late 1990s.
Fully a dozen years ago I warned DoD is "devolv[ing]" in cyberspace:
web.archive.org/web/2016032800…
3/6
And this brings me to a vital concern I have with the ingredients in ANY well-resarched DoD-centric cyberspace treatise w/ 139 footnotes:
PhD candidates FAIL to earn a doctorate every year because their "well-researched" thesis is way too damn lopsided!
And this brings me to a vital concern I have with the ingredients in ANY well-resarched DoD-centric cyberspace treatise w/ 139 footnotes:
PhD candidates FAIL to earn a doctorate every year because their "well-researched" thesis is way too damn lopsided!
4/6
As for the Jervis Healey Zetter¹ et al. treatise?
I mean it's nice, [Jason]. The words are potentially harmless. The [prose] is ... it's pleasant! But I think Tom is definitely right:²
_____
¹ I couldn’t resist 😎
² skip to 09:00 in video
As for the Jervis Healey Zetter¹ et al. treatise?
I mean it's nice, [Jason]. The words are potentially harmless. The [prose] is ... it's pleasant! But I think Tom is definitely right:²
_____
¹ I couldn’t resist 😎
² skip to 09:00 in video
5/6
So! What constitutes a *good* treatise in the style of Jervis & Healey?
Endnote #80 sums up my belief that DoD is "a helpless damsel"
because "cyber war" COMPELS the corporate & personal sectors' TOTAL involvement:
from rural electrical linemen to your grandma's Jitterbug
So! What constitutes a *good* treatise in the style of Jervis & Healey?
Endnote #80 sums up my belief that DoD is "a helpless damsel"
because "cyber war" COMPELS the corporate & personal sectors' TOTAL involvement:
from rural electrical linemen to your grandma's Jitterbug
6/6
Folks, you can't expect @US_CYBERCOM to prosecute cyber war in a vacuum
while thousands of U.S. patients die attached to infected lifesaving medical devices
and @JoeWeissBlog watches power go out nationwide FOREVER.
These DoD-centric treatises need more ingredients!
Folks, you can't expect @US_CYBERCOM to prosecute cyber war in a vacuum
while thousands of U.S. patients die attached to infected lifesaving medical devices
and @JoeWeissBlog watches power go out nationwide FOREVER.
These DoD-centric treatises need more ingredients!
7/6
To my "OG" readers:
The paragraph below sums up why I see no need to tackle the authors' allusions & callouts to "Cyber Pearl Harbor."
If ever there was a "subtweet" in a DoD-centric treatise, this is it!
(@threadreaderapp please unroll)
To my "OG" readers:
The paragraph below sums up why I see no need to tackle the authors' allusions & callouts to "Cyber Pearl Harbor."
If ever there was a "subtweet" in a DoD-centric treatise, this is it!
(@threadreaderapp please unroll)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
