Eisenhower had a serious heart attack in 1955. How did doctors and White House staff handle it? Better than Trump's people. But not flawlessly either. History thread!
Sept 1955: Ike is in Denver, on vacation and staying at home of mother-in-law. He’d been there over a month, playing golf every day at Cherry Hills Country Club, putting in a couple hours of work each day at nearby Lowry Airforce Base. He did a lot of fishing in Fraser, CO.
Friday September 23, in his 7th week away from Washington, Ike plays 18 holes of golf, wolfs down hamburger for lunch, returns to golf course for 9 more holes. Starts complaining about heartburn, indigestion. Goes home, early to bed. Wakes at 2:00 a.m. Searing pain in his chest.
Mamie calls Dr Howard Snyder—an Army doctor with adequate but basic training. He doses POTUS with morphine. In the morning, Snyder tells WH staff that POTUS is “resting” and was recovering from “digestive upset.” Snyder did not know Ike had suffered a heart attack.
By 1:15 pm, Snyder starts to worry. He calls Fitzsimmons hospital, and a cardiologist comes to administer an EKG. Now they know: major heart attack. Snyder orders POTUS transferred to Fitzsimmons by Secret Service. There, doctors give POTUS oxygen and anticoagulants.
Dr Snyder had waited nearly twelve hours to order a gravely ill POTUS to the hospital. It is a controversy that will dog him for the rest of his career.
When was the public informed? About 13 hours after the heart attack. Late Saturday Sept 24, the press team in Denver releases a statement that Ike had suffered a “mild” coronary thrombosis.
The top heart specialist from Walter Reed hospital is flown to Denver. He in turn calls on the nation’s top cardiologist Dr Paul Dudley White of Mass General, to come to Ike’s bedside.
Sunday morning Sept 25. Son John Eisenhower arrives and sees that Ike is “obviously under sedation.” VP Nixon is informed of Ike’s condition but power is not transferred to him, nor does he rush to Denver. Nixon stays in DC, “totally unprepared” he confesses later.
Eisenhower will never transfer power to him. Staff (CoS Sherman Adams, AG Herbert Brownell, Sec State JF Dulles, spokesman Jim Hagerty) shield Ike from outside world and keep Nixon at arm’s length. Ike stays in Denver. Nixon chairs meetings in DC as VP, not as Acting POTUS.
Monday morning: stock market crashes. Worst one day loss since great crash of 1929. Dr White gives brisk, well-informed account to national press conference on heart disease, praises “excellent” care POTUS is receiving, returns to Boston. But: full truth is not reported.
Eisenhower is incapacitated. He is sedated and sleeps most of the week. On Friday Sept 30, staff orchestrates a show of Ike signing papers in bed, but in fact he is weak and ill. He will not be able to *stand up* until October 23—a month after the heart attack.
Not until Nov 11 is Eisenhower well enough to be transferred back to East Coast—he goes to his home in Gettysburg for further recovery. Ike does not resume full duties for three and a half months after heart attack.
Upshot: doctors told press basics. But hid truth that POTUS was sedated, unconscious, too weak to sit up/stand/walk. Staff failed to report prolonged weakness during recovery. Ike remained unwilling to transfer power to Nixon.
The event will cause Ike later to propose a proper succession procedure-- what later becomes 25th amendment to the Constitution for transfer of power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Speaking of Fascists, 98 years ago today (10/29/1922), Mussolini took power in Rome.
How did Americans react?
Outrage? Shock? Collapse of democracy?
Nope. White Americans really liked Mussolini. A lot.
Though Mussolini later created a myth of a popular uprising, Fascism came to power with the support and connivance of elites/ aristocracy. His blackshirts did stage a march on Rome, but this was mostly theatre. He was appointed by the King as prime minister on October 29, 1922.
Made up mainly of WW1 veterans who were angry about poor economic conditions and political stalemate in Italy, the early fascist movement, like the Nazi party that emerged at the same time in Germany, sounded kind of left-wing: jobs! nationalization of industry! State control!
75 years ago this week, as history’s most calamitous war wound down, the British people undertook one of the most remarkable acts in the history of democracy.
As we face our own global crisis, what can we learn from this story?
Americans love Winston Churchill. His pugnacious style, his wartime leadership, his early and steadfast opposition to fascism, all earned him a venerated place in history.
American presidents like Churchill. His bust has been in the White House since 1965, often in the Oval.
During the war, Churchill used his rhetorical gifts to lead his country with skill and tenacity. For two years, Britain fought virtually alone against Hitler, before the US and Russia joined the fight. He never once thought of peace with Nazism. His place in history is secure.
On a positive note: I’m immensely grateful for the journalists of two great newspapers, @washingtonpost and @nytimes — who receive a lot of snarky criticism on this site but who are really among the heroes of this dismal hour. In *today’s papers* alone we can read:
Trump today: "It is not the duty of U.S. troops to solve ancient conflicts in far away lands that many people have never even heard of. We are not the policeman of the world."
In June 1940, exactly 80 years ago, the French and Germans were engaged in an "ancient conflict." 1/5
The Nazis were days away from seizing Paris. How did President Roosevelt respond?
In a graduation speech at Univ of Virginia on June 10 '40, FDR denounced the kind of isolationism Trump invokes today. FDR also announced a new policy of aid to those fighting the fascists. 2/5
FDR: "We are convinced that military and naval victory for the gods of force and hate would endanger the institutions of democracy in the Western World... The whole of our sympathies lie with those nations that are giving their life blood in combat against those forces." 3/5
D-Day, June 6 1944. A few photos here of the Normandy beaches and the story behind this day.
76 years ago today, British, Canadian and American teenagers seized these heights and opened the way to liberation on Western Europe. We owe them.
By June 1944, Germany was losing the war—but it was far from defeated. The Soviet Red Army was about to punch into Belarus; US and British forces were pushing up the Italian peninsula. But no allied forces were yet on German soil. German soldiers still loafed in Parisian cafes.
To get at the heart of Germany, the western allies had to invade France. The complexity of the operation was staggering, and Churchill called it “much the greatest thing we have ever attempted.” Gen. Eisenhower was given command of "Overlord."
May 8, 2020 marks 75 years since the surrender of Nazi Germany to allied forces. A date to celebrate, for sure. But it is also a complicated moment.
What did VE (Victory in Europe) Day mean? And what did it NOT mean? (A thread of 12)
For US soldiers, V-E Day meant an end to fighting in Europe. Since D-Day, June 6, 1944 over 183,000 US soldiers had been killed in action in Europe. That is roughly 546 dead American soldiers every day between D-Day and V-E Day.
For Eisenhower, VE Day marked the end of 3 terrible years of toil. But he did not gloat. Instead, he dictated a simple, stoic cable after taking the German surrender the day before: “The mission of this Allied Force was fulfilled at 0241, local time, May 7th, 1945.”