I feel like I’m split into two perceptions: On the one hand, the president of the United States has a potentially deadly disease and it’s apparently spreading like wildfire through his administration and that’s news that should shake and unnerve the world, including me, as a...
…citizen.
And on the other hand, I feel incredibly distanced from it all, because I don’t actually feel like the United States has a president.
And not on “I don’t recognize that guy as my president” grounds; I fully recognize that he’s got the job.
But I don’t think _he_ thinks he’s my president. I think, at best, he feels like the president of his admirers, and he just thinks he’s my boss. More likely, he thinks he’s everyone’s boss.
I don’t have a boss, as it happens, on either level. I’m self-employed and I’m an American citizen. So on that latter point, he’s supposed to be working for me, for all of us.
But I don’t think he’s been doing that, and I don’t think he even thinks he’s supposed to do that.
I don’t think he’s trying to protect me, or Americans. I don’t think he’s trying to make anything better, except for him and his family.
So when he’s got a potentially-deadly disease, I don’t react to it the way I would if it was any president of my lifetime, including Dubya...
…and Reagan, both of who I detested.
I react to it as “That self-interested using jerk has a potentially-deadly disease, and it might be taking out his gang.”
But at the same time, it’s the fucking president of the United States, which has major repercussions for the nation...
…and the world. And I can see that, too, even if it doesn’t feel like it because he and his enablers in the government don’t act like they’re here to govern, just to rule.
So it’s…dissonant.
If we had a president who was a president, this would be really bad.
Since we don’t, it’s also really bad.
I don’t much care how he and his cronies come through this — I have a variety of schadenfreudey thoughts, but honestly, I don’t want to see the country damaged even...
…further, and frankly, the thought of a state funeral makes my skin crawl.
I find myself hoping that we — the nation and the world — get through this as well as possible and that we come out of it healthier and headed for better days.
Whatever it takes to get to that, I’m for.
The rampant dishonesty and criminal disregard for other people’s safety — the country’s, the world’s, even their own colleagues’ — is appalling.
It’s a terrible, terrible time to have such mendacious, uncaring, self-obsesed people in charge.
I wish us well.
And by “us,” I mean all of us, collectively, including the people out there who don’t agree with me politically and who I don’t agree with in return.
I don’t care all that much about the people doing such a lousy job managing this crisis — but I do hope for the health and...
…survival of the people who have to stand next to them.
Everybody have a good weekend, hey?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I saw a couple people arguing that if you raise the age for gun ownership you have to raise the age for all other legal markers of adulthood, or it's not fair.
I say thee nay,
As we've worked it out, it's very helpful that people can be licensed to drive years before they're licensed to drink; it's very helpful that way.
There also seems to be (don't ask me to cite it) evidence that a later age for gun ownership results in fewer killing sprees.
Whereas being able to vote at 18 doesn't result in crazed voting sprees. And starting military service three years before you could privately own a gun might also be helpful.
A staggered introduction of adulthood seems to be a good idea.
Bob called me, and asked me if I was up for the project. I was hugely flattered, and told Bob that I had no time (this was very true), but for the chance to work with Carlos, I would make time.
Then we had to actually come up with a story!
We originally started with a different concept, and wound up shifting over to the Avengers Forever idea (which was originally set to be a subplot in the main Avengers book, and was retooled into its own story with the helpful advice of Mark Waid).
Secrets of the Comics Revealed, Maybe: After this issue came out, the editor, Denny O'Neil told me that it had seen a nice bump in sales, that we'd gotten considerably more mail on it than other issues in recent memory, that the mail was extremely positive, and I should never...
...do anything like it again. He said this with a sort of reserved smirk, and it confused me enormously.
For a long time I thought what he meant was that despite it doing well, he didn't like it because it was funny, and that's not what he wanted for the book. This may have...
Just saw, on another social-media site, a comics creator who was venting about the character in KING CONAN getting a different name. He was absolutely furious that Marvel would “buckle” to the forces of “cancel culture.”
And I’m thinking, wait, what the hell difference does...
…it make if the character has a different name? Does it alter the character in any significant way? Does it change the concept, the story? Does it do anything except not accidentally offend some of the audience?
No. So what’s the problem?
Why would anyone get _that_ mad about a simple fix to something that barely affects the story or character?
One of the people fervently agreeing with him said comics should come with labels saying that if you’re going to complain, don’t buy it.