Robert Wright Profile picture
Oct 4, 2020 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
My theory: Trump's docs are telling the truth about his mild symptoms (though one may have lied about date of treatment or diagnosis) and Mark Meadows is exaggerating symptoms ("very concerning") to make Trump's recovery a more dramatic and heroic story.
Some people (e.g. my wife) think Trump had a kind of panic attack at White House (about his covid), got oxygen for that, and insisted on going to hospital. That could explain why his doc was evasive about whether he'd had oxygen. And why docs reported only mild symptoms.
This could also explain why Mark Meadows, realizing the truth about Trump having gotten oxygen would come out, started claiming the situation had been truly dire at the White House. Would also explain anonymous officials then insisting Trump had resisted going to hospital.
Note that this theory is consistent w/ my theory above, about Meadows crafting a narrative of dramatic, heroic recovery. The added element is that Meadows is also concealing the true narrative: Trump (who is known to have a deep fear of illness) freaking out and overreacting.
Obviously, all of this is speculative. But it seems to account for the known facts as well as any other hypothetical scenario I'm aware of.
PS: Milder version of panic-attack theory: He did have a bit of trouble breathing due to covid (along w/ other, modest, symptoms), freaked out & wanted all possible therapies/precautions. This too is consistent w/ my initial theory & explains Meadows/White House spin.
And finally: My wife adds that based on her reading it's very rare for a covid patient to desperately need oxygen once but never need it again. (And final disclaimer: all this is speculative, and neither my wife nor I is a doctor.)
Update: I have to admit that the last 24 hours of news, especially the docs' Sunday press conference, hasn't been kind to my theory. Too bad. It was a great theory.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Wright

Robert Wright Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @robertwrighter

Mar 25, 2023
American troops in Syria are violating international law by being there. They should come home. nytimes.com/2023/03/24/us/…
If you condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a violation of international law (as I did), and you support the continued presence of US troops in Syria (a violation of international law, since the Syrian government doesn't want them there), you have some explaining to do.
And it doesn't work to say 'but Syria's government is bad and Ukraine's isn't.' The UN Charter's ban on violating the territorial integrity of nations doesn't work that way.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 28, 2020
Since this July tweet ridiculing people who doubted that Biden had the race locked up, Biden's edge in RCP Battleground States average has dropped from 6.2 to 3.0.
I repeat what I tweeted in reply to Derek's tweet at the time:
Read 5 tweets
Jun 30, 2020
Am I the only who thinks too many of the initiatives emerging from the George Floyd moment are either modest corporate concessions, symbolic moves of unclear value, or non-viable policy proposals? Anyway, that’s what I just wrote about in @NonzeroNews. nonzero.org/post/george-fl…
In particular, in this piece on how addressing economic injustice can help address racial injustice-- nonzero.org/post/floyd-rac… --I examine this challenge: Image
The main idea is that we need Bernie-level ambition: serious taxes on the affluent, serious help for lower-income people (education, health-care, jobs program, etc.). The George Floyd moment is a rare opportunity to think that big.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 30, 2020
In the latest @NonzeroNews, I argue that the agenda emerging from the George Floyd protests should expand to encompass more Bernie-esque policies, because racial justice and economic justice are so tightly intertwined. nonzero.org/post/floyd-rac…
Also, there’s the pragmatic reality that the George Floyd moment is an opportunity to demand more in the way of taxing the rich and directing resources toward the poor, helping blacks disproportionately as well as many whites. Why not seize it?
And, at a tactical level, these policies could strengthen Dems’ appeal to low-income white voters. Trump has worked hard to convince them that Dems are in the thrall of identity politics and therefore are the enemy. This is a chance to prove him wrong.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 2, 2020
Right now on Fox Tucker Carlson is implicitly belittling Trump for not having shown he can protect America: "People will not forgive weakness." I've got a bad feeling about where this is heading.
Carlson preceded this with a narrated mashup of looting/violence, etc. He's inflaming Trump's base while basically telling Trump he better hurry up and respond to the inflammation.
This reinforces my guess that any violence/destruction that can be associated with the protests will turn out to be a political gift to Trump.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 16, 2020
WHO's early performance wasn't perfect--as I wrote in this @NonzeroNews piece: nonzero.org/post/did-who-f… --but WHO declared a global emergency Jan 30 & it took Trump 6 more weeks to put 2 and 2 together and declare a national emergency. I'm pretty sure WHO wasn't the main problem.
And as for the charge that WHO was influenced by China: Well, as I also noted in that piece-- nonzero.org/post/did-who-f… --the problem of powerful nations corrupting the mission of international bodies is a real one, and the US has been guilty at least as often as China: Image
What's more, it may turn out that China's main leverage over WHO wasn't raw power. (China's not a huge donor.) More likely: WHO wanted to get as much cooperation from China as possible during a pandemic (in keeping w/ WHO's mission) and so was loath to antagonize it.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(