Michael Pettis Profile picture
Oct 4, 2020 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
1/4
The author says that "since 2015, the central bank has allowed the currency to trade more freely. The PBoC’s shift has enabled the renminbi to undertake the same signalling role that the yen historically played regarding the dollars prospects."

ft.com/content/0534f1…
2/4
I disagree with much of this article, but especially the claim that the RMB began trading freely in 2015. In fact what happened is that the PBoC shifted from targeting USD to targeting a basket of currencies (the CFETS RMB Index). If you continue tracking the RMB against...
3/4
the dollar, it might seem that the RMB has become much more volatile, but most of that is simply USD volatility.

Against the basket, on the other hand, the RMB has been very stable: it is less than 1% higher today, for example, than it was four years ago. What is...
4/4
more, during the past four years it has always has remained well within four percentage points of its current level, and at least 3/4s of that time it has remained within two percentage points of its current level. This is far from being a freely floating currency.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Sep 17
1/6
According to the WSJ, after a few years in which the earnings of the poor rose faster than the earnings of the rich, in 2025 the earnings of the rich have risen faster. In theory this should have resulted in a lower US trade deficit.
wsj.com/economy/us-eco…
2/6
That's because the rich consume less of their income than the poor, and so a shift in the relative income share from poor to rich should have reduced overall US consumption and increased overall US savings, which in turn should have reduced the US trade deficit.
3/6
But the US trade deficit continued to expand. This seems pretty strong evidence that the US trade account isn't driven only by domestic conditions, as most mainstream economists assume. What foreigners choose to do matters just as much or even more.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 16
1/6
SCMP: "President Xi Jinping has called for more efforts to develop a unified domestic market, arguing that it will be crucial to helping China secure an edge in international competition and meet its development goals."
scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/6
In a hyperglobalized world, a country gets to choose between economic sovereignty and global integration. The more it chooses to integrate into the global trade and capital system, the less control it exerts over its domestic economy.

rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_w…
3/6
The world is probably better off if every country chooses more global integration (i.e. has more open trade and capital accounts and less control over its external imbalances). This maximizes the benefits of international trade.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 15
1/7
In August, both growth in industrial output and growth in retail sales came in well below expectations, with the former up 5.2% and the latter up 3.4% (compared to 5.7% and 3.7%, respectively, in the previous month).
english.news.cn/20250915/7a106…
2/7
As always, the key point is that for all the talk of rebalancing, the proxy for output growth continues to outpace the proxy for consumption growth by quite a large margin.

Meaningful rebalancing requires that consumption outpace GDP growth by roughly two percentage points.
3/7
Some analysts argue that the weaker-than-expected growth in industrial output may be evidence that Beijing’s attempt to rein in involution is starting to work. Industrial output growth in July and August came in at the lowest paces in all of 2025.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 12
1/8
Bloomberg: "China urged Mexico to “think twice” before levying tariffs, a warning that could signal Beijing’s willingness to retaliate over a move it sees as giving into demands from the US."
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/8
Mexico announced plans earlier this week to impose duties of as much as 50% on cars and other products made by China and several Asian exporters.

These are the kinds of stories I think we'll see more of in the next year or two.
3/8
In the past ten years Chinese exports to Mexico have nearly doubled, and its trade surplus has surged, to $71 billion last year.

This bilateral evolution must be understood as part of a global shift.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 12
1/14
Barry Eichengreen warns, correctly, that "The dollar’s international primacy isn’t eternal. To be sustained, it has to be actively fostered and preserved."

But why sustain the dollar’s international primacy? Is this merely a modern monetary fetish?
wsj.com/finance/curren…
2/14
While the primacy of the dollar is certainly good for bankers, financiers, and very wealthy owners of movable capital, what's much less obvious is the extent to which it benefits or harms American workers, manufacturers and middle class households.
3/14
Some analysts will argue that being able to transact in dollars benefits American exporters and importers by reducing currency hedging costs, but the more honest ones will acknowledge that the benefits are tiny, at best, and that their lack doesn't seem to hamper rivals.
Read 14 tweets
Sep 11
1/10
Interesting new IMF paper on the extent of industrial policy subsidies to Chinese manufacturers and SOEs (to the extent information is available) and their impact on productivity.
imf.org/en/Publication…
2/10
It measures national-level cash subsidies, tax benefits, subsidized credit, and subsidized land, which collectively amount, it says, to a high 4% of GDP. The authors note that other subsidies exist, including sub-national subsidies, but these are harder to measure.
3/10
I'd include in the latter what is perhaps among the biggest subsidies, which is over-spending on logistical infrastructure. To the extent that these cost more in resources than they create in economic value, they represent a large transfer to the users of the infrastructure.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(