For their family of five that's $23 per person per day.

That's an *insane* expenditure, but it makes sense at high degrees of food waste + restaurant orders.
Anyway, reminder that $200 is the foodstamps maximum. So a fuck ton of us grew up in families fed on less than $200 per month.
I used to self-recriminate pretty hard in my early twenties when my monthly expenditure on food reached $300. I thought I was being a frivolous person, over-indulging to make up for my youth. I feared someone would find out and I'd be reviled for such wasteful entitlement.
Like no joke, in my twenties I *hid* when I'd go out for a $3 burrito or a slice of pizza. I thought such grotesque expenditures just for taste and convenience was shameful. I worried someone would catch me. I still flinch when ordering a meal/combo at freaking Taco Bell.
Like who orders a *combo*?

lah-dee-dah, fucking moneybags over here is too good for a bean burrito, a soft taco (sub beans), and a water.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with William Gillis 🏴

William Gillis 🏴 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rechelon

10 Oct
Good arguments against borders:

1) Nations are not voluntary collectives & cannot claim property.

2) Ethnicity & region are arbitrary and unrelated to personal value.

3) Collectivist dynamics in general are dangerous.

4) Severing mass connectivity reduces options for all.
One of the more unique dynamics around national borders is that their evil is *over-determined*.

There are MANY pressing / root ethical reasons to reject them. And someone making a bad argument for them in along one line inherently invokes outrage along the other lines.
And the typical argument for borders is "you would exclude a neonazi from your house, so why can't we as Country X exclude foreigners with bad cultures" There's just so many fucked up mistakes at play in that you can't quickly address them. You get bogged down in one direction.
Read 7 tweets
9 Oct
The SEIU and the NAACP have dug their grave in Portland.

It's hard to emphasize enough how the left in this city will never forgive them for siding with a universally reviled lumber baron and spineless stooge of the police state. They've cast their lot with the conservatives.
It's critical to note that the SEIU and the NAACP didn't come out swinging for Teargas Ted until it was revealed he was badly losing the election to a leftist.

This isn't an endorsement of shitty politician likely to win, this is a last ditch attempt to defend the establishment.
There's no calculus where standing by a far-right universally hated figure like Ted Wheeler *benefits* workers. The SEIU's stance is *purely* a defense of the boss because the union brass benefit from the existing order and fear even tepid leftist political progress.
Read 5 tweets
9 Oct
I'm still trying to piece together the full context of the Wolverine Watchmen, and the right-libertarian insistence on fighting over COVID precautions of all things is just embarrassing, but it's actually quite funny that MAGA hacks are platforming them to call them lefties.
If you're a MAGA or GOP hack, lemme tell you the last thing you want is to platform before your audience is an ancap critique of Trump as tyrant.

They're immune to critiques from anarchists or people not infested with racism/nationalism, but ancap critiques are effective w them.
One of the things the left tends to do is just assume that every dynamic of ideological infection pulls rightward. But for all their incredibly cringey bad politics, it is also the case that dipshit ancaps can pull MAGA chuds -- for lack of a better term -- "leftward."
Read 4 tweets
7 Oct
So Trump has almost certainly been pressuring the FBI to focus on investigating antifascists for years now, via replacing leadership, DOJ edicts, etc. No doubt there are at least a dozen open deep investigations of various groups. And Trump wants a public show before Nov 3rd.
I have been assuming for four years now that mass raids to enable public show declarations about the horrible "criminal" antifa menace will come this month.

On the other hand the FBI rank n file are going to object "but we don't have much, we need to keep surveilling"
The FBI obviously wants to destroy the anarchist movement, they're not honorable or progressives, they'll happily lie and use clearly absurd overreaches of power against us. However. They're educated and long-term about it. They see themselves as apolitical re elections.
Read 26 tweets
6 Oct
Jurassic Park is far less a critique of capitalism than engineering (and civilization). Wu is very clear that he's not an inquirer or discoverer, he's an engineer. Arnold and Nedry are engineers. Malcolm critiques science and civ explicitly, but his first enemy is engineering.
The only *scientists* in Jurassic Park are Grant, Sattler, and Malcolm. They're brought in to examine the failures of those who engineered the creatures and the park.

And while the profit motive helps spur the park, the specific failures it had are from *engineering* hubris.
Everyone remembers the one scene of criticism they allowed Malcolm in the film's version where he complains about the rapid commodification of nature, but this was a rewriting of his critique into a very different form people were used to. And it's promptly undermined by Hammond.
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct
I admit I called this wrong.

The Crime Nerd thought Sarah could win, and I simply didn't expect ANY Ted voters in the primary to flip to Sarah. I expected 35% Sarah, 60-65% Ted, 1-5% Teressa.

I must now update my priors & prepare to pay out a bet.
wweek.com/news/city/2020…
For Ted to collapse from ~50% of the vote in the primary to 30% is very surprising to me. I expected more class consciousness from middle class liberals, I probably assumed too much political awareness. I thought Ted was so toxic by the primary his remaining base was unswayable.
In trying to correct for the fact that I'm embedded in left circles I tend to take pamplin, nextdoor, and reddit as representative of huge chunks of portland. And everything I saw indicated the city's normie middle classes HATE Sarah (and Chloe).
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!