We all draw our own battle lines to fight the BIG LIE of the biosecurity state's pseudomedical tyranny, which kills pretending to save. Mine drawn at fighting the face mask lie on a daily basis. Face masks kill by shifting attention from what really saves lives: vitamin D & zinc.
Isn't it obvious that as infections stop at a certain % of the population you want that section of the population to be students rather than pensioners & therefore you want to encourage transmission between students rather than the opposite? That transmission can save lives?
“The more successful a strategy is at temporary suppression, the larger the later epidemic is predicted to be in absence of vaccination, due to lesser build-up of herd immunity.”
imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robin Monotti Graziadei

Robin Monotti Graziadei Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @robinmonotti

15 Oct
I know.

I know the names of those responsible for what has been called a ‘coup d’état’ (but is in reality a series of ‘coups’ instituted for the preservation of power).

I know the names of those responsible for the Covid19 pandemic of 2019-2020.

overland.org.au/2012/03/what-i…
These are the names to begin this story with, although there was someone else behind them:
These are the people who were literally hiding behind it all:
Read 5 tweets
15 Oct
Guess what? SARSCoV2 has been around almost one year (Wuhan Military Games: October 2019). This means it's not NOVEL anymore. It's just another endemic coronavirus like the other ones we have always had. So why don't we test for those? Not scary enough for the public? 😱
All coronaviruses have always led to hospitalizations & deaths in the immunocompromised in autumn & winter, as well as 99.87% of recoveries in everyone else. It has ALWAYS been like this. It's just we did not test for them. So why do we test for one and not the all the others? 🤔
So we in general never tested for coronaviruses, why do we test now, and why do we test for only one of them (allegedly) when all of them can kill you? Only because of the "novel" part. Yet SARSCoV2 is no longer novel! It's been around the world many times with daily flying.
Read 16 tweets
13 Oct
There is no scientific basis, or precedent, or studies, or literature, or proof, anywhere that something called #circuitbreaker has any science behind it, at all. They literally just made it up, just like lockdown. Herd immunity, on the other hand, has been studied for 100 years
The Science: "A #circuitbreaker is an automatically operated electrical switch designed to protect an electrical circuit from damage caused by excess current from an overload or short circuit. Its basic function is to interrupt current flow after a fault is detected."
A #circuitbreaker is yet another empty use of sloganeering, it's made up language for technocratic fantasies of control, it has no basis in the study of the transmission of respiratory diseases: in plain language, it's meaningless governmental jargon trying to sound smart.
Read 4 tweets
7 Oct
#Covid19 Infection Fatality Rate: 0.13%
#Influenza Infection Fatality Rate: 0.13%
"Between 2010/11 and 2018/19, the number of people in the US who died from the flu each year ranged from 12,000 to 61,000 with an average of 37,462 flu deaths, while the number who had flu symptoms ranged from 9.3m to 45m, for an average of 28.6m: IFR at 0.13 per cent."
Source for the influenza IFR from US numbers: aap.com.au/lockdown-criti…
Read 6 tweets
6 Oct
Cinemas are not closing because they have no new films to show. Cinemas are closing because people are not going, & the majority of people are not going because they don't want to submit to the mandatory restrictions. The restrictions are the real problem.
In fact there are so many good films that could be shown in cinemas that the film sales market is now a buyer's market.
If you buy a drink or snack, even a bottle of water, you don't have to wear a mask as you are slowly sipping or snacking throughout the film screening, you will be asked to wear a mask going in and out. I think this should be voluntary not mandatory if we want to save cinemas.
Read 4 tweets
4 Oct
This study claims to prove that if you have flu & cough 10 times with an N95 mask on it will reduce the viral shedding compared with coughing 10 times with no mask or covering your mouth. This is pretty self evident & obvious & nobody is doubting this.
journals.plos.org/plospathogens/…
But what is interesting is this part: "Fine particles [those most likely to pass through the mask material] contained 8.8 (95% CI 4.1 to 19) fold more viral copies than did coarse particles."
So the point is that yes if you are coughing a lot anything that covers your mouth during coughing will reduce (but not eliminate or stop completely) the viral shedding, this is pretty obvious and nobody ever argued against this.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!