The Newfoundland grocery strike against Loblaws & billionaire Galen Weston Jr. is part of a 100+ year war against Weston greed.

In 1897, Galen's great grandfather George Weston opened his "model bakery" in Toronto, and got busy fixing prices and breaking unions.

Read on...
I found the Bakers' Strike advert reprinted above in several 1905-1906 issues of The Tribune, "The Official Organ of the Toronto District Labor Council". Seeing "Weston", I investigated further. Here are some of the actions and views of George Weston between 1905 and 1908:
In spring 1905, the 2-year union agreement with Toronto's "master bakers" was expiring. The master bakers chose not to meet collectively with the union as they had in 1903. Individual agreements were signed with all but three master bakers. George Weston was one of the three.
Weston's "Model Bakery" was the largest in Canada, and he was considered the most powerful master baker in the country. Yet, he demanded wage cuts of $13 to $10 a week and a 1:1 helper-worker ratio designed to push down wages. The union wanted 1:3.

The Tribune, September 9 1905
In 1905, the Toronto Bakery Workers Local 204 launched a strike against Weston and the two others. George Weston immediately committed himself to breaking the strike and the union: "We will not consider taking back any of the men who have gone out."

Toronto World, June 6 1905
During the strike, the Canadian Association of Master Bakers met in Ottawa. George Weston, treasurer of the association, presented a paper entitled "The Open Shop" describing unions "a disturber, destroying competition and favoring monopoly."

Toronto World, Aug 9 1905
Yet, when a "rate war" erupted in early 1906, Weston and the master bakers resolved it with the standard practice of price-fixing.

In 2018 it was revealed George Weston Ltd., a subsidiary of Loblaws, was colluding in fixing bread prices for 15+ years.

Toronto Star May 1 1906
At this point, I exhausted my limited resources in finding out how the strike ended. Who won? Who lost? More research is required. At least we know the union survived. It helped win a strike of Jewish bakery workers in mid-August.

Toronto Star, August 14 and September 1 1906
As 1906 came to a close, nine of Toronto's master bakers came under municipal prosecution for selling underweight loaves of bread. Among those identified was none other than George Weston.

Toronto Star, December 20 1906 and January 18 1907
Thomas Chisholm, president of the Borthwick Baking Co., was a test case and found guilty. Later in 1907 and early 1908, more bakers were fined. Weston's case was repeatedly adjourned until Jan 7 1908.

Toronto Star, Jan 25 1907
Toronto World, Dec 12 1907
Toronto Star, Jan 3 1908
George Weston finally took the stand on January 7 1908. The Toronto Star provided an entire page of verbatim coverage. Weston claimed his bread was in fact overweight, but in the end was found guilty and fined $30.

Toronto Star, January 9 1908
Today, the 3rd richest Canadian is Galen Weston Jr., CEO of George Weston Ltd. and Executive Chair of Loblaws. George Weston's wealth has been passed down through four generations of Westons, along with his penchant for price-fixing and union-busting.
1,400 Newfoundland grocery workers have been on strike at Loblaws-brand Dominion supermarkets for 8 weeks now. They're combating cuts to full-time jobs, low pay for part-timers, and the cuts to pandemic pay. Loblaws is gushing profits.

Victory to @Unifor597!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Pandemic Pogey

Pandemic Pogey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StandingTheGaff

26 Sep
I guess we have paid sick days but the NDP was never going to trigger an election over it. After Singh curiously claimed he had won paid sick days in May, the Liberals twice committed to them: in mid-July, and again in Aug after proroguing.
Since May, the NDP and specifically Horgan has sought PSD through EI. Horgan's business-first re-election strategy is served by EI premiums covering PSD costs, allowing him to avoid the ON/QC/PEI precedent and have business shoulder 100% of PSD costs under a provincial law.
With no apparent challenge from Singh, the Liberals will not be raising EI premiums either after relentless cuts at the request of businesses for at least two decades. This is a commitment the Liberals made in August alongside their announcement PSD would come through EI.
Read 9 tweets
22 Sep
A frank discussion of bourgeois class strategy by Ibbitson in the Globe - with the big Fraser Institute assist. You can see how they're clarifying their perspectives and generalizing a line of march as they jockey, stoke and manage the crisis to their advantage.
Ibbitson plays the hits from the 90s:
debt-to-GDP ratio
pension bomb
long healthcare wait-times (privatize!)
higher taxes are self-defeating

With new bangers:
structural deficits
deteriorating infrastructure (P3s!)
overcrowded classrooms (P3s!)
low interest rates for how long?
Ibbitson is well-positioned to do this. He's a student of the 1990s "austerity drive". He wrote a book on the Common Sense Revolution, which covers the rise of the Ontario neocons, how they conquered the Ontario PC Party, rebuilt the shattered party and developed the CSR.
Read 9 tweets
14 Sep
I see no compelling evidence that NDP extracted CERB, "paid sick days" from unwilling, inflexible Liberal govt - esp. when NDP aligned with CFIB for wage subsidies. Given their 2008 coalition & Notley/Horgan/Trudeau love triangle, I'd wager there's a top-level Lib-NDP agreement.
The Liberals have always shown incredible flexibility in making populist left pivots. Recent examples include Trudeau's performance in 2015 which @Martin_Lukacs documented so well in his book the Trudeau Formula. Freeland, author of Plutocrats, is well-versed in this, too.
After Liberals made the greatest health & social cuts in Cdn history in 1995, Chretien/Martin won in 1997 on modest social reinvestment (which panned out during the Clinton Boom). They even got Romanow (Judas of Sask socialism) to mollify popular anger over their own health cuts.
Read 13 tweets
13 Sep
The scale of CERB - 8.5 million recipients - and its speed of implementation has changed the debate about Basic Income and/vs EI. The Liberal-NDP bloc, backed up by sections of labour, have embraced BI as a technocratic renovation aimed at reforging a broad popular base.
Critiques of BI as a neoliberal trojan horse are powerful, especially when/if essential expenses are subordinated to fully marketized prices. But with BI now on the horizon with the NDP and labour as partners, such critiques are useless with no oppositional powerbase or strategy.
Apologies - this thread was cut short due to a bad connection. Continues below.
Read 8 tweets
25 Aug
Relatedly, Don Cherry's paternal grandfather John was an original NWMP constable and later a Great Lakes ship captain. These ship captains and companies were so brutal and conditions so awful, it spawned the militant Cdn Seaman's Union on the Great Lakes in the 1930s.
During the war, the CSU membership was involved in the merchant navy, the deadliest of any Canadian service in WW2. An estimated 1 in 7 were killed. Once the war was over, the CSU waged a victorious strike in 1946 for the 8 hour day and vastly improved conditions.
John Cherry's son, Delmar, was an electrician for Canadian Steamship Lines, the dominant shipping power on the Great Lakes & St. Lawrence. After the 46 strike, CSL worked with the Liberal govt, mob, police, and red-baiting unionists to terrorize, murder & destroy the CSU in 1949.
Read 6 tweets
24 Aug
If you've ever been subjected to an anti-union talk from a manager or supervisor, you've probably heard a variation of the "third party" argument in which a union will interfere, poison or halt direct relations between you and managers. This is usually bullshit.
However, there's a truth to this argument when a union has no workfloor presence with effective, trusted unionists. In a workplace like this, an appearance by a union rep is strange and alienating and mgmt can stoke anti-unionism, intimidate, and even organize a decert campaign.
Similarly, ineffective union stewards and lazy well-paid union reps responsible for steward training and recruitment means the union is just another bureaucratic hassle for workers. Some stewards are literally selected to discourage grievances so union rep workloads are lighter.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!