"Had it not been for the belief that Brexit might be overturned, perhaps Brussels would have listened to those who, in the aftermath of the referendum, wanted to draw Britain into a market-only tier, part of a “ring of friends” around the EU."
I'm sorry to say that Dan has been living in his own version of the truth since 2016, which has often been out of step with the rest of Vote Leave. They never gave a shit about EFTA yet he still projects his truth onto them as though they agree with him. They didn't and don't.
This point certainly resonates – that imperial thinking drove *pro-EU* politicians, not eurosceptic ones as is often claimed by modern Remainers – and is something that Grob-Fitzgibbon also touched on.
Brexit did not just happen because Britain has some noisy eurosceptics; it happened because the entire British body politic viewed 'Europe' through the lens of Britain's past.
Colonial/imperial history and 'free trade' in particular.
Great thread from @EmporersNewC tackling the Brexiter argument at the nucleus of Brexitism: that the European project is heading towards becoming a superstate "and we want no part of it".
Steve's thread shows there was undoubtedly a thread running through the European project's history that showed a 'superstate' ('a country called Europe') was not sought.
My first point in response is that the EU's back-history is characterised by its uncertainty about a precise destination.
It's therefore almost inherent in a review of EU history that "one can see what one wants to see" - a point/issue I've noted before.
Suggested (controversial) new year's resolution for Remainers:
Give up on trying to Rejoin the EU.
Make a Norway-esque 'single market relationship' your new stretch goal. Do not waiver in pushing for it. Labour will grow into the idea and will join you. And who knows... more than a few wobbly Leavers may join you too. Healing may begin.
One side seeking total victory over the other – again – is not a recipe for healing. Recall that this issue has dogged this country since c.1945 (and arguably longer). It didn't magically appear in 2016 – see pinned tweet thread.
It's not a cast iron link but it indicates an intellectual predisposition for needing hidden (and often simple if fantastical) explanations to explain a complex world. This explained it well.
Something as complex as the EU and something like how modern trade works had no chance against such a mindset. The EU & its agents were always out to get us; there was always going to be a great deception involved; and trade was always going to be about tariffs alone.
I may have missed this thread first time round but it is spot on.
A return to empire is not what drives Brexiters. It is more about being the embattled plucky underdog; and that belief & determination will carry us to success, no matter what.