Some thoughts on insulting sanctities and how it relates to free speech:

Firstly, just to get this out of the way: what that man did in Paris is not sanctioned by Islamic sharia. And this is not a new age hippie sharia I am referring to but conventional Islamic jurisprudence.
Having said that, why is there such an aversion in the Islamic tradition, to insulting sanctities?

What's the big deal about a cartoon caricaturising the Prophet?

It's just a cartoon, after all. Right?
The short answer is no.

Insulting sanctities is not a light or trivial matter. Whether it is a cartoon mocking the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) or a degenerate artist whose idea of "art" is to place the likeness of Jesus (pbuh) into a vat of urine.

These are both heavy offenses.
Why?

Prophets of God are universal paragons of morals, virtue, and justice. By trying to demean these holy personalities, in effect what someone is doing is rejecting the very notion of ethics / morals.

You cannot stand for ethics and then demean the personification of ethics.
This is why those who are inclined towards making such caricatures or crass gestures towards sanctities, are generally rather ill-mannered. Their inclination toward demeaning holy persons is rooted in their contempt for the morals and virtues which these personalities upheld.
So... where does free speech fit into all of this?

Well for one, there is a difference between academic realm, and the realm of altering and manipulating public discourse through cheap methods.

e.g. my country is Iran. Uh oh. Very strict Islamic law-governed country, no? Well..
You walk into a book store and all the books by all the atheist European thinkers are there. Freud, Marx, Hume, Nietzsche, Russell, etc. etc.

You will find far more of these in Iran than you would ever find Molla Sadra or Farabi, in your typical American or European book store.
And this is not just limited to dead European thinkers, either.

There was a well-known Iranian "intellectual" in the 20th century named Ahmad Kasravi, who made some very serious and heavy criticisms of our sixth Imam, Jafar al-Sadiq (pbuh).
All Muslims have a deep respect for Imam Sadiq (pbuh), but for the Twelver Shia school of thought (which the majority of Iranian people belong to), he is believed to be infallible. So a statement against him is akin to a statement against the Prophet.
Nonetheless, walk into any bookstore in the Islamic Republic of Iran and you are guaranteed to find some books of Mr. Kasravi.

And I imagine it is similar in most Islamic societies. I am only using examples from Iran because this is what I am familiar with.
So... What is the difference between the academic realm and other realm? Why this distinction? Why is there more room for so-called "free speech" in one, than the other?

The academic realm is (ideally, anyway) a realm of the exchange of ideas based on reason and logical proofs.
There is a need for openness in this process.

However, political cartoons, popular TV shows, etc., are a means of bypassing that process entirely and poisoning public discourse without even having to use logical proofs or engaging in intellectual discussions.
Be very wary of anyone who says "nothing is sacred." Such a person is either lost, or he is totally committed to falsehood and to imparting falsehood upon others.

The role of sanctities in human society is to serve as a model for how we must live; how we must conduct ourselves.
Without these sanctities, what exactly are we doing?

If nothing is sacred - not even the holy personages of the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh), of Jesus (pbuh), and the like - then what are the boundaries? What is the framework for correct human ethics and morals?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with freshie mentality

freshie mentality Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @johnnytorkustan

27 Jul
Why the "Iranian opposition" in exile is so ravaged, so defeated, so broken?

Every faction from every potential political or ideological persuasion, is completely defeated. Monarchists, liberals, Marxists, pan-Iranists, whatever MEK is, etc. etc. etc... but why?
This is a long discussion although it doesn't need to be. We can suffice in saying: what they say is not consistent with the realities of the field. The ideas in their head are limited to their own echo chamber; this is why the changes they seek, never come to be.
A perfect example is: they say Iran is a Chinese or Russian puppet state. This is a projection. All of their parties are completely beholden to American or Zionist support; this is their lifeblood.

Do you know who understands the realities of the field? Ardeshir Zahedi.
Read 20 tweets
10 Jul
So I decided, whatever, may as well read this Iran-China trade agreement. You can read it all here if you want: documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?ur…

It's not even long. It's less than 20 pages. Starts off with a preamble, the two great ancient nations of China and Iran etc. etc. etc.
Summary of the aims of the deal. Expanding economic cooperation, knowledge transfer, tourism et al., expanding the cooperation between universities and scientific institutions, and defence cooperation. Nothing really that strange but of course these are generalities.
Alright, moving on... and OH, what do we have here. "Cooperation in the banking sector with high standards, emphasizing the use of national currencies (i.e. NOT US DOLLARS) and combating money laundering and the funding of terrorism and organized crime."
Read 26 tweets
28 Jan
Two people spoke at the Tehran procession (for Haj Qasem and Abu Mehdi): Zeynab Soleimani and Ismail Haniyeh. The former was a fairly obvious choice: this was her father's procession, and the symbolism of a woman named Zeynab giving such a powerful oration was not lost on anyone.
But it is the latter choice that keeps coming back to me. Why Haniyeh? The people in attendance could not even understand his words, and yet he was chosen to give a speech. I don't think this is without reason.
Palestine is the central cause of the Resistance Axis. It has been since day 1. And it will always be. But it goes even deeper than that. Palestine is the key to many doors. It serves as a sort of separator of truth and falsehood; justice and tyranny.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!