Roko Profile picture
19 Oct, 8 tweets, 2 min read
In the dating market, unemployed, low-status men have a significant edge that many people underestimate - thread🧵
Men at peak economic and social status rarely have to try to get romantic attention by being kind/loyal - whilst average women are shunned without kindness. It's easiest to learn how to be loyal at a young age - some men never have to.
Traditional liberals, bluepill and other communities often marry old and prioritize kindness/loyalty above all else in men - they sometimes don't even consider wealth, status or sexual virility as desirable mate qualities.
Many people, but especially more socially liberal people and progressive women vastly underestimate the significant edge that short, submissive, beta men have in the dating market and how often they are sought after as long-term dating prospects.
So if you're a 45 year-old male and live in your mother's basement, consider that you have an edge in the mating market (kindness, loyalty) that many people, especially women, seriously underestimate!
The rationalization hamster is an ever-present threat to honest, rational appraisal of how life works.
That's not to say that everyone who has some negative quality is terrible and will never find love.

People have other qualities and overall almost anybody will be able to match with someone. We all have negative qualities, myself included!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roko

Roko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RokoMijicUK

20 Oct
A major reason that a lot of people are unhappy (that people don't talk about enough) is that our society has made housing about 6 times more expensive than it needs to be.

A huge amount of everyone's income disappears into a black hole that's caused by this.
Money is the universal representation of value; when you spend $20 in theory someone is doing roughly one hour of work just for you.

For example, I can get a weekly food shop for about $60 at Lidl. So making food for one person for one week takes 3 hours of work.
This is a great deal. At no previous point in human history could you feed a man for 3 hours of work.

So how much does accommodation cost?

I pay about $200/week for accommodation. But I know people in the USA who pay about $500/week.
Read 11 tweets
18 Oct
How deadly is #COVID19?

It varies a lot by age, which confuses us.

In fact, the mortality risk from covid-19 is almost exactly the same as 1 year worth of "normal" background risk. You just get an extra year of risk compressed into a few weeks.
But young people don't have very much risk per year. So deleting a teen, 20, 30, 40 or 50 year-old's year via lockdowns is 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘵.

medium.com/wintoncentre/h…
Year-long Lockdowns only start to become worth it on a per-person basis if:

(years of life remaining)×(risk of dying of #COVID19) > (years of lockdown)×(quality of life decrease from lockdown)
Read 8 tweets
18 Oct
Omega informs you that there is a series of 10 illnesses, each identical to #COVID19. Choose:

"Lock down": everyone will be unemployed/locked at home for 15 years, but 0 deaths

"Surrender": 5% of the population dies from disease, mostly people 65 and older & very few young.
OK, Omega is generous and gives you a third option:

"China Control": Give control of our police, public health and smartphone privacy to Chinese consultants who will implement a solution similar to what worked in China, for 15 years. (We still have military control)
That means:

- Government knows your location/contacts at all times
- You can be stopped by police and tested at any time, if +ve you get taken away for isolation with no right to refuse
- But because it works, this stuff almost never actually happens
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
Human life without signalling games would be meaningless and almost completely worthless for most people.

Signalling is so utterly fundamental to humans that we certainly shouldn't even consider proposals to replace the signal with the underlying truth.
Imagine hetero dating, but without signalling.

You'd submit yourself to an automatic test of various types of quality and input preferences into the computer about how you trade off different qualities in the opposite gender. A match would appear. You'd be automatically married.
You'd move in, maybe take some pills to increase sexual desire if you needed it and have sex. That's it.

No dates, no flirting, no looking at clothes/hobbies/beliefs. Just a computer match.
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct
Q: "Where are All the Successful Rationalists?"

Personal success is determined by conscientiousness more than anything else. (Assuming you have decent IQ, like 115 or so). If you are determinied to keep trying, to stick at stuff etc, you usually win.

applieddivinitystudies.com/2020/09/05/rat…
Rationality techniques are notoriously useless at creating conscientiousness.

The other factor is luck/numbers.

There are a lot of people, but not that many rationalists. The others have 8 billion attempts to succeed.
Success in the modern world means being a "Linkedin person".

Lots of impressive achievements and credentials! (but nothing too innovative or controversial)

Happy! Smiling!

Hard working!

Conformist!
Read 7 tweets
16 Oct
The West should accept covid-19 defeat and move on. There was a time where we could have beaten it with good testing, border closures and lockdowns. But we didn't.

We should now cancel all government restrictions related to covid-19. News sites should stop reporting it.
Hospitals should prioritize people by age and simply stop making a fuss about the excess deaths that will result.

There will be a certain amount of death that results from this, but the cost we are paying in ruined lives for everyone is too high to justify it.
The likely death toll from ending the "fuss" about covid-19 will be something like 0.25% of the population, with some fraction (maybe another 0.5%) permanently injured via long-covid.

Most who die of covid-19 will be older and will have already got something out of life.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!