Lets just have a show of hands, virtually. How many of you were aware the UK press and broadcasters (TV and radio) have been operating under what amounts to censorship which would have made Erich Honecker proud?

Just to cheer you up...I've so far asked 15 MPs and not a single..
...one had even heard of the Ofcom guidelines.
In the past, we would think of Ofcom as fluffy and mostly toothless. They might slap you if you said a rude word before 9pm. Now they've gone full Stasi. Allegedly, a big name broadcaster is ready to quit, citing censorship and...
...a growing awareness that thousands of men, women and children have been harmed and many have died, following a covid-19 strategy that is clearly wrong.
I invite that person to contact me. My proposal is, we hold hands and jump. I mean we do a two hander. You resign and tell...
....your loyal & trusting audience that you've been horribly mislead by the authorities who've increasingly censored the news and that you're sorry, but you cannot do it any more. Then I explain how SAGE, either through incompetence or malign reasons have lied to you all year.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yardley Yeadon

Yardley Yeadon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MichaelYeadon3

26 Oct
@GrahamRTurner @JamesMelville If you meant in U.K., that’s literally impossible.
The worlds most cited & active scientist, Dr John Ioannidis, published his latest update on the infection fatality ratio. It’s 0.15-0.2%. 1 in 500 population representative infections lead to a death.
Let’s imagine SAGE is....
@GrahamRTurner @JamesMelville ...right, and 100% of U.K. population was susceptible. Let’s imagine Profs Gupta & Gomez and there’s no such thing as herd immunity. Everyone catches it. I calculate a MAXIMUM of 134,000 deaths. Not a million.
Now, it’s clear roughly 30% did have prior immunity due to earlier...
@GrahamRTurner @JamesMelville ..infection by related viruses. This means they don’t get infected, get ill, participate in transmission or die (from the virus...some will die from others things, as 620,000 do yearly in U.K.). Now far fewer get infected. Herd immunity of course IS a thing. Unless you’ve a...
Read 11 tweets
26 Oct
I admit I’ve not focussed on Wales but that might make my viewpoint fresh.
I wonder if almost everything is down to false positives greatly worsened by testing people already in hospital. Let’s say there’s some covid19 in the community (not convinced, myself, but I’ll go with it)
....and we’re seeing the usual flow of admissions rising through autumn. Intensive testing of patients where there are any really infected patients makes contamination a near certainty. One strand of even partial viral RNA getting into the swab, stick, glove & bag is all it...
...takes. Now we’ve an apparent epidemic of nosocomial or hospital acquired infections. But they have most to be false, because we don’t see marked if any excess deaths. There will of course be people who are ill & get admitted for all sorts of reason, and roughly 1.7% of...
Read 5 tweets
24 Oct
@SteveGreaves9 @Psycobunny I regret to say this is true. I was shocked recently to discover that EVEN MPs DONT SEEM TO KNOW ABOUT THIS:
ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/…
The text reads:
. However, we remind all broadcasters of the significant potential harm that can be caused by
material relating to the....
@SteveGreaves9 @Psycobunny ...Coronavirus. This could include:
• Health claims related to the virus which may be harmful.
• Medical advice which may be harmful.
• Accuracy or material misleadingness in programmes in relation to the virus or public policy
regarding it.
We will be prioritising our...
@SteveGreaves9 @Psycobunny ....enforcement of broadcast standards in relation to the above issues. In these
cases, it may be necessary for Ofcom to act quickly to determine the outcome in a proportionate and
transparent manner, and broadcasters should be prepared to engage with Ofcom on short timescales.
Read 9 tweets
23 Oct
nytimes.com/2007/01/22/hea…
Does this ring any bells?

It’s a now-classic ‘PCR false positive pseudo epidemic’.

Different infectious organism (a gram-negative bacterium) & disease (whooping cough) but all the other features look familiar.
Look at the characteristics:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22250029/
“Pertussis Pseudo-outbreak linked to specimens contaminated by Bordetella pertussis DNA From clinic surfaces”.

These technical staff were not even under the kind of time pressure the poor lab techs in U.K., yet the false...
...positives arose from contamination on the work bench & surrounding areas. Infinitesimally small amounts of contamination are proven to be sufficient to light up positive in PCR. It’s a brilliant technique. But it’s just not reliable on mass scale unless you’ve tremendous...
Read 9 tweets
23 Oct
lockdownsceptics.org/what-sage-got-…
I’ve previously shown that U.K. is over the herd immunity threshold. That’s why London isn’t experiencing 500 deaths per day from Covid19.
In summer, I & others deduced a false positive rate in Pillar 2 of around 1%. Julia Hartley-Brewer forced Hancock to confess “it’s just under 1%”, accounting for substantially all the “cases”.
Once you accept there is a FPR, don’t you need to know the %? It varies. It’s much...
...worse as number of tests per day soars, as all sample preparation is done MANUALLY, by underpaid & often inexperienced, recently hired staff.
I contend no more than that the FPR now is perhaps 5%. If so, then there ARE NO CASES.
Sure, people do get ill, get admitted with...
Read 7 tweets
22 Oct
Coronavirus testing lab 'chaotic and dangerous', scientist claims - BBC News
Dr Julian Harris & another, unnamed, scientist resigned from a major coronavirus testing lab, citing chaos & even poor safety practises.
It was this item, preceded by a few... bbc.co.uk/news/health-54…
...other news items, usually fronted by the horribly under qualified ‘medical correspondent’, Fergus Walsh, which got my attention. Followers will note I discussed the impact of inexperience on error induced false positives. I am more sure of this now. It may be that there is...
...no cross reactivity whatsoever with even partial sequence identity between certain PCR primers & sequences in common cold-producing coronaviruses (there are four which are endemic & apparently around 3% of us has one of these colds at any time from now on. But it’s not....
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!