10-K Diver Profile picture
Oct 31, 2020 33 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll help you understand Same Store Sales (SSS), and why it's such an important metric for retailers.
2/

SSS comes into play whenever we have a company whose business is spread out across several different locations.

Think store chains -- Home Depot, Costco, Target, Walmart, Dollar General, etc.

Or restaurant chains -- Starbucks, Chipotle, etc.
3/

So, what exactly is SSS?

In simple terms, it's just a comparison.

We *compare* the sales made by a bunch of stores this year -- versus the sales made by the same (or a similar) bunch of stores last year.
4/

At a chain, sales growth can come from two sources:

a) Better performance (higher volumes, price increases) at *existing stores*, and

b) *New stores* that expand the market and serve new customers.

SSS tries to measure the impact of a) while *excluding* the impact of b).
5/

Let's break this down a bit.

Suppose we have a chain of hardware stores -- ABC Hardware. The chain had 100 stores last year.

Chains like this are always optimizing their "store footprint". Always opening new stores, closing down underperforming stores, etc.
6/

So let's say, over the past 1 year, ABC Hardware opened 10 new stores, and closed down 5 underperforming stores. So now, they have 100 + 10 - 5 = 105 stores.

Here's a fancy Venn Diagram showing both last years' and this years' stores: Image
7/

As the Venn Diagram above shows, there were 95 stores in the chain that were open for business both last year *and* this year.

These 95 stores form our "same store base".

To get Same Store Sales (SSS), we compare the sales made by these 95 stores -- last year vs this year.
8/

For example, suppose these 95 stores together made $100M in sales last year, and $110M this year.

Then, we can say that our SSS grew 10%.
9/

Given this description, calculating SSS may seem like a fairly straightforward thing.

But there are a few "finer points" to consider.

For example, what if a store was open for only 3 months last year, but for all 12 months this year?
10/

What if a store was open all 12 months both years, but a big section of the store was closed for remodeling during the holiday season this year?

What if a store was shut down for part of this year due to Covid-19?
11/

SSS can be a very useful metric for a retail chain, but it's not a "GAAP" quantity.

So, companies that report SSS figures often make judgment calls to answer these kinds of questions -- and hence decide what exactly gets included in (and excluded from) SSS calculations.
12/

That's why it's a good idea to read the footnotes in the 10-K: they often provide a reasonably precise description of how the company calculated its reported SSS numbers.

For example, here are snippets from Starbucks's and Home Depot's 10-Ks: ImageImage
13/

So, why does SSS matter?

After all, an extra dollar of sales is an extra dollar of sales, right?

Why should it matter whether that dollar came from an existing store or a newly opened store?
14/

The answer is:

The *top line* (revenue) impact of that extra dollar is indeed exactly the same -- whether it's an "SSS dollar" or a "new store" dollar.

But if it's an SSS dollar, a much bigger portion of it is likely to flow through to the *bottom line* (net income).
15/

Why?

Because each store in a retail/restaurant chain usually has significant *fixed costs*.

Let's think about the "per store economics" of such a chain.
16/

First, setting up a store usually involves a big upfront cost.

This includes everything from constructing the store, furnishing it, setting it up for handling incoming truckloads of goods, installing corporate IT, etc.

Say all these expenses come to ~$3M per store.
17/

This ~$3M cash outflow occurs before the store makes its first dollar of sales.

But it's usually not expensed right away in the company's financials.

Instead, it's *depreciated* over the life of the store's assets -- over 10 years or so.

For more:
18/

Thus, every store has a more or less fixed depreciation cost per year -- amounting to ~$300K per year (~$3M over ~10 years).

This is a non-cash expense, but for retailers it's usually a very real cost -- stores have to be constantly maintained/renovated.
19/

Once the store opens for business, there are other fixed costs.

Rent. Electricity. Insurance. Security. A big part of employees' wages.

These are all more or less fixed costs that have to be incurred as long as the store stays open -- even if it makes $0 in sales.
20/

Let's say all these fixed costs together come to ~$1M per store per year.

On top of this, there's variable costs that rise in proportion to sales.

A good example is Cost Of Goods Sold (COGS). If gross margins remain roughly constant, COGS grows in proportion to sales.
21/

Also, some employee bonuses may be tied to sales. In some stores, a portion of the monthly rent may depend on sales as well. These are also variable costs.

All inclusive, let's say variable costs come to ~50% of sales.
22/

So, if a store's annual sales (revenue) is $R, its operating profits will be about "50% of $R, minus $1M".

Calculations: Image
23/

Now we can understand why $1 of SSS growth usually ends up contributing much more to the bottom line than $1 of sales from a new store.

Let's say our chain has 100 stores.

And let's say each store did $3M in sales last year.
24/

Neglecting corporate overhead, and assuming a 25% tax rate, that works out to ~37.5M in net income for the whole chain.

Calculations: Image
25/

Now, suppose the chain grew sales by 7% this year, and *all* of this growth came from SSS growth.

Then, this *7%* sales growth (top line) leads to a *21%* net income growth (bottom line).

In other words, SSS growth usually comes with significant operating leverage. Image
26/

But what if the 7% sales growth came from opening new stores instead of SSS growth?

In this case, our *7%* sales growth only creates the same *7%* net income growth.

Sales growth via opening new stores does not usually create significant operating leverage. Image
27/

This is why SSS growth is such a key metric for retail and restaurant chains; it's because of the operating leverage that usually accompanies it.

But wait. It gets even better.
28/

Net income generated via SSS growth is usually *real cash*.

This cash can be distributed to shareholders right away as dividends -- assuming that the company is reasonably efficient at managing working capital (inventory, receivables, and payables).
29/

But if a chain can only grow by opening new stores, much of its net income is usually needed to cover the upfront costs associated with opening new stores.

This money becomes *retained earnings*; it's not available to be distributed to shareholders as dividends.
30/

This is why Buffett loves See's Candies so much.

See's has pricing power. Each See's store can grow sales each year simply by raising prices.

No need for additional capital to open new stores every year.

Capital is committed only when returns are truly mouth watering.
31/

Here's a 15-year simulation of our store chain, assuming it's able to grow SSS by 7% per year for the first 10 years (and 0% thereafter).

Assuming no "multiple expansion", a shareholder in this chain will earn ~18.21% annualized over these 15 years. Not shabby at all! Image
32/

But if the same 7% growth comes exclusively from opening new stores, our hypothetical shareholder's return drops to just ~9.02% annualized.

What a dramatic difference SSS growth makes!

And it all comes down to just 2 things: operating leverage and capital lightness. Image
33/

It took me a while to work this out, and understand the power of SSS growth in retail/restaurant chains.

I hope this thread helped you gain an understanding and appreciation of SSS as well.

Thanks for reading. Enjoy your weekend!

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 10-K Diver

10-K Diver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @10kdiver

Jan 1, 2023
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through "Gambler's Ruin".

This is a classic exercise in probability theory.

But going beyond the math, this exercise can teach us a lot about life, business, and investing.
2/

In my mind, Gambler's Ruin is the math of "David vs Goliath" ("Skill vs Size") type situations.

Here, David is a "small" player. He only has limited resources. But he's very skilled.

Pitted against David is Goliath -- a "big" player who has MORE resources but LESS skill.
3/

The battle between David and Goliath rages on for several "rounds".

Each round has a "winner" -- either David or Goliath.

David -- because of his superior skill -- has a higher probability of winning any individual round. That's David's advantage over Goliath.
Read 32 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, we'll explore the question:

As investors, how often should we check stock prices?

To answer this, we'll draw on key ideas and concepts from many different fields -- probability, information theory, psychology, etc.
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC, Inc.

Every day that the market is open, our stock either:

- Goes UP 1%, or
- Goes DOWN 1%.

For simplicity, let's say these are the only 2 possible outcomes on any given trading day.
3/

Suppose we think ABC is a "good" investment.

That is, the company has a wide moat, good returns on capital, decent growth prospects, etc. And the stock trades at a reasonable price.

So, we buy the stock -- expecting to make a very good return on it. Say, ~15% per year.
Read 40 tweets
Oct 23, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through 2 key portfolio diversification principles:

(i) Minimizing correlations, and
(ii) Re-balancing intelligently.

You don't need Markowitz's portfolio theory or the Kelly Criterion to understand these concepts. Image
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC Inc. Ticker: $ABC.

The good thing about ABC is: in 4 out of 5 years (ie, with probability 80%), the stock goes UP 30%.

But the *rest* of the time -- ie, with probability 20%, or in 1 out of 5 years -- the stock goes DOWN 50%.
3/

We have no way to predict in advance which years will be good and which will be bad.

So, let's say we just buy and hold ABC stock for a long time -- like 25 years.

The question is: what return are we most likely to get from ABC over these 25 years?
Read 23 tweets
Sep 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the P/E Ratio.

Why do some companies trade at 5x earnings and others trade at 50x earnings?

When I first started investing, this was hard for me to understand.

So, let me break it down for you.
2/

Imagine we have 2 companies, A and B.

Let's say both companies will earn $1 per share next year.

And both companies will also GROW their earnings at the SAME rate: 10% per year. Every year. Forever.
3/

Suppose A trades at a (forward) P/E Ratio of 10. So, each share of A costs $10.

And B trades at a P/E Ratio of 15. So, each share of B costs $15.

Which is the better long term investment: A or B?
Read 31 tweets
Sep 4, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a fundamental business concept that may be counter-intuitive to some of you:

Just because a business has made $1 of PROFIT, it does NOT mean the business's owners have $1 of CASH to pocket.
2/

To understand why, let's start with how PROFIT is defined.

PROFIT = SALES - COSTS

That is, we take all sales (or revenues) the company made during a quarter or year.

We back out all costs incurred during this period.

That leaves us with profits.

Seems straightforward.
3/

Here's the problem:

The way a "lay person" understands words like SALES and COSTS is completely different from the way an *accountant* uses these same words.

These discrepancies can create enormous confusion.
Read 20 tweets
Aug 28, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a framework that I call "Lindy vs Turkey".

This is a super-useful set of ideas for investors.

Time and again, these ideas have helped me think more clearly about the LONGEVITY of the companies in my portfolio.
2/

Imagine we're buying shares in a company -- ABC Inc.

ABC is a very simple company. It earns $1 per share every year. These earnings don't grow over time.

And ABC returns all its earnings back to its owners -- by issuing a $1/share dividend at the end of each year.
3/

Suppose we buy ABC shares for $5 a share.

That's a P/E ratio of 5.

We know we get back $1/year as a dividend.

So, for us to NOT lose money, ABC should survive AT LEAST 5 more years.

If something happens and ABC DIES before then, we'll likely lose money.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(