German quality newspaper @handelsblatt reports on new anti-EV study by German society of engineers VDI (@VDI_News).
VDI states that electric vehicles emit more CO2 than combustion engine vehicles due to battery production.
But VDI uses wrong numbers for...
battery production.
For those who don't know me: I research energy systems & mobility at the @TUeindhoven and specialize in comparing CO2 emissions of electric vehicles and combustion vehicles.
My main problem with the VDI study is that they use wrong numbers for battery production.
They assume producing a 48 kWh battery emits 8,9t of CO2.
That means 185 kg/kWh (8900kg/48kWh).
As I show in my study, emissions per kWh have plummeted in recent years and are now around 75 kg/kWh.
I call this the first of six errors that many anti-EV studies make.
Every real expert in the field knows this by now.
So 8.9t becomes 3.6t. (4.5t worst case.)
Before you go "But... but... production in China using coal" you should read my report and understand that the drop is mainly due to factory processes becoming much more efficient as we learn and scale up.
I dug up a footnote in a study I debunked that nicely illustrates this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
GEOTHERMAL
Just saw a fascinating webinar and you should too if geothermal interests you.
It explains how techniques from fracking are creating a game-changer in the last few years that can reduce the cost of energy systems without fossil fuels.
🧵
The webinar by prof. Roland Horne from @Stanford is about Enhanced Geothermal Systems or EGS that he defines as using fracking to make the area between the infusion and extraction well permeable for water.
He focuses on @fervoenergy, a company founded by two @Stanford alumni (one from his program) that has for the first time in history used the horizontal boring technique from fracking in geothermal.
This eviscerates the last credibility of @Toyota regarding EVs.
They (esp. Gill Pratt) have been pushing the story we should buy their hybrids instead of full EVs because lithium batteries are and will stay the bottleneck
Grid congestion is THE bottleneck for economic growth and sustainability in the Netherlands.
But it doesn't have to be!
When we combine Dynamic Line Rating with Peak Shaving we could move three times more electricity with the current grid!
🧵
What is Peak Shaving?
Peak shaving means that you take measures to lower the peaks in electricity usage. Peaks are what limits use of a power line. In the example graph below you can see the demand is too high a few yours per week. But there is more than enough capacity overall
Adjusting only the 2.5% of electricity demand that causes the biggest peaks adds 25% of capacity.
Removing 17% of energy from the peaks (e.g. with dynamic pricing, batteries, smart charging, etc. etc.) provides 50% more capacity.