Jason Kint Profile picture
Nov 6, 2020 22 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Like our own President? As I reviewed the press conference late tonight, I wondered at what point we sound the alarm that he’s using active measures on us? t.co/GsvexctPOO
Please stop and read this. It’s from the Republican-led bipartisan Senate Intel Report Volume 5. It’s important we recognize what is happening. It was a landmark report and many of the same actors are still active and engaged. Image
This was written six weeks ago. We knew it was coming. nytimes.com/2020/09/22/us/…
Image
“This time they’re not writing anything that’s not already said in U.S. space,” often by Mr. Trump himself. They must be flabbergasted and saying, ‘We really don’t need to work hard this time.’” - @selectedwisdom
And yes @selectedwisdom warned us back in 2017.
I’ve been asked why I focus on Google and Facebook but not Apple, Amazon or MSFT. Well only two have businesses built off surveillance advertising and microtargeted content/ads. The same two also regularly not only host but match-make harmful content with vulnerable audiences.
I don’t think one of the largest and most profitable companies in world should also, not only host, but promote video calling for the beheading of the FBI Director. Bannon should have already been on a watch list. This never happens on AMZN, Netflix, MSFT, APPL...just Facebook.
Again, this doesn’t happen on APPL, AMZN, MSFT. But it does on YouTube and Facebook. YouTube was particularly egregious. We knew this was coming, your platforms are being used to undermine democracy.
So yes it’s time for resignations and leadership changes. It’s mindblowing FB played the role it did in 2016 yet covered it up for years without any changes to leadership. Of course, you’ll continue to have more significant issues if the same leadership remains in charge.
Per the above, there is still an all-hands-on-deck to spread disinfo taking its lead from the White House. It needs to be crushed by counter-speech and Facebook/Twitter enforcing their policies rapidly eliminating sharing tools so they don’t amplify the toxic lies.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Here are some more. These need counterspeech. Replies of factual information. Elimination of viral tools by Twitter. Labels and amplification of the facts.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Best thing a lot of people can do right now is retweet this @FoxNews tweet below. Use it to reply to lies. ***I don’t care what you feel about Fox News.*** It’s the most trusted news brand with the people who most clearly are vulnerable to the president’s lies.

GO!!!!! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
ps to be clear, I don’t care or need the retweets. Take the Fox News tweet and share it. Those with large audiences do the same. Even reporters at competitive media outlets should do it - IMHO. Bad actors are coordinating to spread disinfo. You should amplify the facts. Broadly.
Here are more tweets that have gone out since the election was projected by every single independent outlet including Fox, Reuters, NBC, CBS, ABCx CNN, AP. Facebook and Twitter should both be focused on labeling and preventing amplification of these. And amplifying facts.


Image
Image
Image
Image
All of the tweets above are being sent by accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers. The President’s tweet will approach and surpass one million retweets if left to spread. I’m fascinated and worried by the dynamic - they’re all taking his and only his lead for now. Image
Still being considerably amplified - again, taking their lead from the White House without counterspeech to check them. Most of the public is living within their bubbles and news sources - oblivious to this. I hope I’m wrong but Rudy + Breitbart are making the situation clear.


Image
Image
Image
Image
We’re now indeed pushing 800k retweets and it’s still there. If you read this thread ⬆️ from the top-down, you’ll understand my concern and the role of the platforms.

Image
Image
Image
Thread above still holds. all-hands-on-deck effort to spread disinfo continues taking its lead from Trump. It needs to be crushed by counter-speech and Facebook/Twitter enforcing their policies rapidly eliminating sharing tools so they don’t amplify the toxic lies.

Image
Image
Image
Rudy seems to be all-in, too. Nearly all tweets by Trump, Rudy, et al do have labels so I continue to recognize Twitter’s good work here.
Image
Image
Influentials with hundreds of thousands of followers including even governors, will continue to work to question the results until Trump concedes. Some tweets are opinions / fine but others are terrible so context is important.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Someone just resurfaced this warning thread ⬆️ I started on Nov 6th and closed on Nov 8th. Reading through it again, it’s disturbing to officially end it by recognizing what then happened on January 6th.
Closing this thread out with this series of video documentaries. Many more missed I’m sure.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

Sep 14
ok, this is HUGE. Late Friday, Penske (PMC) filed a wicked-smart, landmark antitrust lawsuit against Google. I've now read it in full and I'm very impressed. Importantly, it's the first antitrust suit for Google tying its AI-driven products to its adjudicated search monopoly. /1 Image
The core claim: Google is abusing its search monopoly to force pubs to hand over content - not just for traditional search indexing but to feed its AI. Google then repurposes it to substitute them with its own services breaking the fundamental bargain of the open web. /2 Image
Penske says this is not a fair exchange. If it weren't for Google's adjudicated monopoly power (recall Judge Mehta said they get 19x as many queries as next biggest), Google would be paying pubs for these rights or if it didn't then they would opt-out of providing them. /3 Image
Read 16 tweets
Sep 6
OK all ye people depressed Judge Mehta didn't order Google broken into bits this week. I'm here to cheer you up. DOJ has its other remedies trial in 16 days and just posted its PFJ (Proposed Final Remedies) now 60+ pages of brilliant detail. Let me walk you through key terms. /1 Image
This is the 2023 US v Google adtech win - the one DCN and its premium publishers have long been much more deep and focused on. Here’s what it means for publishers of all types - and why it will be a massive win for the open web if Judge Brinkema signs on (I believe she will). /2 Image
First, clear structural remedies. Google must divest AdX, its ad exchange, w/in 2yrs and likely DFP, its publisher ad server. No more vertical ad stack monopoly with interest conflicts. This would finally decouple tools Google can use to rig auctions and suppress pub revenues. /3 Image
Read 14 tweets
Sep 5
All eyes at Google on streaming NFL game tonight but Google Inc and its many monopolies have had quite the week. I’ve been absorbing on this end, some quick Friday thoughts on things missed. Bad news certainly for the public, and also DCN members, in US v Google Search case. /1
Judge Mehta said "no thanks" to helping publishers - because he said no pubs testified. Maybe that’s what retaliation fear looks like??? He also noted the unlawful conduct was about distribution deals, not deals with publishers. More on that in a minute. /2
Despite Mehta finding Google illegally maintained its 95%+ search monopoly with browser deals, he also said it’s OK for Google to keep owning Chrome - the world’s biggest browser - so they can keep paying everyone else and free riding on their own browser. All bad here. /3
Read 13 tweets
Jul 17
Woah. Facebook just settled immediately before board members Andreessen, Thiel, Zuckerberg, Desmond-Hellman, and Sheryl Sandberg were set to testify as to who knew what and when…depriving public of any accountability and facts in courtroom from board and officer comms. 1/3
Counter to Facebook lawyers framing yesterday, the DC AG suit isn’t dead (awaiting DC Circuit from 1/30 hearing), and NdCal shareholder suit also still alive. This is the closest to
Courtroom testimony after about $8B+ in settlements. 2/3
Credit to Reuters, Delaware Online who I saw actually showed up to cover. It’s likely why Facebook, Zuckerberg and its board, let this one get so close. But the grid. But today things were likely to get very very hot. 3/3
Read 5 tweets
Jul 15
News cycles. News cycles. What I called the "mother of all lawsuits" for Facebook in 2021 goes to trial TOMORROW. Zuckerberg, Marc Andreessen, Sheryl Sandberg, Peter Thiel, other board members expected to testify live as to who knew what and when in its largest scandal ever. /1 Image
Meanwhile, Zuckerberg and Facebook comms have successfully flooded the zone with AI-hype and exclusive CEO interviews mostly distracting the press away from a trial on how they leveraged, and allegedly abused, personal data to drive a decade of massive growth in mobile share. /2
The case involves allegations the board broke its loyalty to company (and Zuckerberg insider traded on stock) after Facebook had been long violating its FTC consent decree and other privacy laws - all covered up by nearly $8 billion in settlements ($5B alone with the FTC). /3 Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 17
Woah. Exhibit list just posted for Facebook trial in DE starting in a few weeks. We finally have confirmation Sheryl Sandberg was deposed by the SEC - one week prior to Zuckerberg which also kept secret until a lawsuit unsealed it. Sandberg was also sanctioned in this case. /1 Image
This matters as it gets at Who Knew What When at FB ahead of the world finding out its platform was leaking personal data for years. Zuckerberg was dodgy at best under oath to Congress, FB responses to Parliaments focused on 2018 news. But exhibits include Jan 2017 MZ emails. /2 Image
The DE lawsuit claims Facebook's $5 billion record settlement was inflated in order to protect its CEO, Zuckerberg, and also includes (civil) insider trading claims. Zuckerberg was ordered to sit for multiple day depo this year, will have to testify live. /3 Image
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(