The following information is provided via an anonymous data scientist and another anonymous individual who wrote a script to scrape the national ballot counting time series data of off the @nytimes website.
This is based on their proprietary "Edison" data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press.
The CSV is available here:…
And the script to generate it is here:
I suggest that everyone back up both of these files, bc this is an extremely important data source, and we cant risk anyone taking it down.
What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.
One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots. Image
As we can see on this log-log plot, for many of the counting progress updates, we see an almost constant ratio of #Biden to #Trump. It's such a regular pattern that we can actually fit a linear regression model to it with near-perfect accuracy, barring some outliers.
How could this be possible? Is this a telltale sign of fraud? Surprisingly, as it will be shown, the answer is no! This is actually expected behavior. Also, we can use this weird pattern in the ballot counting to spot fraud!
Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again. Image
and again Image
and again Image
and again all over the country. What appears to be happening is that points on the straight line are actually mail in votes. The reason they're so homogeneous across with respect to the ratio of #Biden vs #Trump votes is that they get randomly shuffled in the mail... Image
like a deck of cards. Since the ballots are randomly mixed together during transport, spanning areas occupied by multiple voting demographics, we can expect the ratio of mail-in #Biden ballots to mail-in #Trump ballots will remain relatively constant over time...
and across different reporting updates.

Lets dig a little deeper into this:
Here is a plot of the same Florida voting data, but this time it's the ratio of #Biden to #Trump ballots, versus time. What we see is that the initial ballot reportings are very noisy and "random". Image
The initial reporting represents in-person voting. These vote reports have such large variation bc in-person voting happens across different geographic areas that have different political alignments.
We can see this same pattern of noisy in-person voting, followed by homogeneous mail-in reporting in almost all cases.
What we see in almost all examples across the country is that the ratio of mail-in Dem to Rep ballots is very consistent across time, but with the notable drift from Dem to slightly more Rep. Image
This slight drift from D to R mail-ins occurs again and again, and is likely due to outlying rural areas having more R votes. These outlying areas take longer to ship their ballots to the polling centers.
Now we're getting into the really good stuff. When we see mail-in ballot counting where there isn't relatively stable ratios of D and R ballots that slightly drift R, we have an anomaly! Anomalies themselves are not necessarily fraud, but they can help us spot fraud more easily.
Now let's look at some anomalies:
This is the Wisconsin vote counting history log. Again, on the Y axis we have the ratio of D to R ballots in reporting batch, and on the X axis we have reporting time. Image
Around 4am there, there is a marked shift in the ratio of D to R mail-in ballots. Based on other posts in this thread, this should not happen. This is an anomaly, and while anomalies are not always fraud, often they may point to fraud.
so what happened just before 3am CST in Wisconsin? This did!
Around 3am Wisconsin time, a fresh batch of 169k new absentee ballots arrived. They were supposed to stop accepting new ballots, but eh, whatever I guess.
By 4am the D to R ratio was all thrown out of whack. That is because these ballots were not sampled from the real Wisconsin voter population, and they were not randomized in the mail sorting system with the other ballots. They inherently have a different D to R signature...
than the rest of the ballots quite possibly bc additional ballots were added to the batch, either through backdating or ballot manufacturing or software tampering. This of this being kind of analogous to carbon-14 dating, but for ballot batch authenticity.
lets look at another anomaly: Image
Here is Pennsylvania's vote counting history. For the first part of the vote counting process, we see the same pattern for mail-in ballots that we've seen in every other state in the country, which is relatively stable D to R ratio that gradually drifts R as more ballots...
come in from rural outlying areas.

But then as counting continues, the D to R ratio in mail-in ballots inexplicably begin "increasing". Again, this should not happen, and it is observed almost nowhere else in the country, because all of the ballots are randomly shuffled...
in the mail system and should be homogeneous during counting. The only exceptions to this are other suspect states that also have anomalies.
Again, this is evidence of ballot backdating, manufacturing of software tampering.
Lets look at another anomaly: Image
In Georgia we see pretty much the same story as Pennsylvania: increasing fractions of mail-in D ballots over time even though it defies logic and we see this pattern no where else in the country.
In Michigan, we see a combination of Wisconsin strangeness, together with the GA/PA weirdness. We see both signs of contaminated ballot dumping, and ballot ratios drifting toward dems when they should not be. Image
Virginia: Image
Now in fairness, VA is the only state out of the 50 that has anomalies but has not had accusations of voter fraud, yet. I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Yet to figure out what causes this anomalous shift, but here it is so no one accuses me of holding it back.
Lets wrap this up: It appears Dems shot themselves in the foot bc making everyone do mail-in ballots actually makes it easier to catch mail-in ballot fraud. Bc all of the ballots go through the postal system, they get shuffled like a deck of cards, so we expect reported...
ballot return to be extremely UNIFORM in terms of D vs R ratio, but to drift slightly towards R over time bc some of those ballots travel farther. This pattern proves fraud and is a verifiable timestamp of when each fraudulent action occurred.
Please disseminate as necessary. Good luck. Stay safe. Be kind to your neighbors.


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with CulturalHusbandry

CulturalHusbandry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @APhilosophae

4 Dec
Today a brand new, never before seen video was released of Georgia election workers pulling boxes/cartons of ballots out from underneath tables during the supposed "water leak" and noving them to areas to be scanned.
This is brand new video mind you.
Upon seeing the video Georgia state Senator Elena Parent went after the person testifying stating that news outlets had already debonked this video. A videk being seem for the first time. Already debonked. By media. She lied with full and total confidence
For those not watching the video or requiring context here is a quick run down:
Read 8 tweets
3 Dec
🔥🔥🔥On Nov 29 Judge Batten produced 3 orders. The 1st to freeze voting machines, the 2nd a reversal and the 3rd to yet again prevent any wiping, clearing or altering of these machines from happening.
The next day @MattJohnstone10 produced this 10 minute video of election machines being loaded into moving trucks, violating the court order.

So for days people wondered who hired them? Who were they? It turns out these trucks were rented to 3Movers 1Truck in Ga. Image
Read 5 tweets
3 Dec
The absentee ballots were in pristine condition, had 110 per batch, not 100. Off center, crooked printing. Paper was different. No folds. Identical markings for Joseph R. Biden.
When unsealing the Fulton Co batches they had a batch of 60 (not 100) from a quality living center but nothing else. They waited to help and were told no need, they were done.
When you're seeing a stack that 98% are for one candidate this is odd. It was only 10am and counting was still going on but we were told to leave.
Read 6 tweets
3 Dec
What if I believe in the right of the individual over that of the state? People form states and states form the fed govt. States should exit, not ask for rights to be rescinded via a federal power. Why would oklahomans want their rights reduced bc Michiganders or others cheated?
You dont en masse ask for a suspension of rights and law to preserve a federal structure when the people are the state. The state may exit. They are free to reform as they wish. Return to Jeffersonian Democracy as our founders intended. Lincoln was wrong to do it as would this be
Read 4 tweets
2 Dec
This would be the most significant occurence in American government since the creation of the Federal Reserve. It would be a MONUMENTAL shift in America and unlike something like the Fed, this may be an excellent idea!…
All regulatory agencies could and likely would be deemed unconstitutional. Goodbye ATF, OSHA, FDA, EPA, FCC and more. GONE. As someone who believes in Jeffersonian Democracy this is a dream.
All deligated regulation legislation will be made unconstitutional. Every action must be approved of by congress. No more bullshit like the ATF deciding to make bump stocks illegal without congressional approval, despite not being elected or even allowed to create legislation.
Read 8 tweets
2 Dec
They were allowed to check a sample, and found 2% of the sample had problems, which resulted in a 3% vote swing for Biden. This is large enough to swing the results of the elections and thus a full audit of all duplicates is called for.
People will shout duplicate ballots do not amount to much. HOWEVER, this DOES give justification for a FULL audit, after which they will find more errors than in just duplicate ballots.

They found proof that some ballots were switched by poll workers which is extremely damning.
Anyone who shills this as "oh its just one or two votes" is moving the goalpost yet again. They arent interested in truth or valid elections. What they are interested in I cannot say but it likely isnt in the interest of preserving fair elections within the United States.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!