The following information is provided via an anonymous data scientist and another anonymous individual who wrote a script to scrape the national ballot counting time series data of off the @nytimes website.
This is based on their proprietary "Edison" data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press.
The CSV is available here:
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id145669…
And the script to generate it is here:
pastebin.com/NkYXrJEX
I suggest that everyone back up both of these files, bc this is an extremely important data source, and we cant risk anyone taking it down.
What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.
One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots. Image
As we can see on this log-log plot, for many of the counting progress updates, we see an almost constant ratio of #Biden to #Trump. It's such a regular pattern that we can actually fit a linear regression model to it with near-perfect accuracy, barring some outliers.
How could this be possible? Is this a telltale sign of fraud? Surprisingly, as it will be shown, the answer is no! This is actually expected behavior. Also, we can use this weird pattern in the ballot counting to spot fraud!
Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again. Image
and again Image
and again Image
and again all over the country. What appears to be happening is that points on the straight line are actually mail in votes. The reason they're so homogeneous across with respect to the ratio of #Biden vs #Trump votes is that they get randomly shuffled in the mail... Image
like a deck of cards. Since the ballots are randomly mixed together during transport, spanning areas occupied by multiple voting demographics, we can expect the ratio of mail-in #Biden ballots to mail-in #Trump ballots will remain relatively constant over time...
and across different reporting updates.

Lets dig a little deeper into this:
Here is a plot of the same Florida voting data, but this time it's the ratio of #Biden to #Trump ballots, versus time. What we see is that the initial ballot reportings are very noisy and "random". Image
The initial reporting represents in-person voting. These vote reports have such large variation bc in-person voting happens across different geographic areas that have different political alignments.
We can see this same pattern of noisy in-person voting, followed by homogeneous mail-in reporting in almost all cases.
What we see in almost all examples across the country is that the ratio of mail-in Dem to Rep ballots is very consistent across time, but with the notable drift from Dem to slightly more Rep. Image
This slight drift from D to R mail-ins occurs again and again, and is likely due to outlying rural areas having more R votes. These outlying areas take longer to ship their ballots to the polling centers.
Now we're getting into the really good stuff. When we see mail-in ballot counting where there isn't relatively stable ratios of D and R ballots that slightly drift R, we have an anomaly! Anomalies themselves are not necessarily fraud, but they can help us spot fraud more easily.
Now let's look at some anomalies:
This is the Wisconsin vote counting history log. Again, on the Y axis we have the ratio of D to R ballots in reporting batch, and on the X axis we have reporting time. Image
Around 4am there, there is a marked shift in the ratio of D to R mail-in ballots. Based on other posts in this thread, this should not happen. This is an anomaly, and while anomalies are not always fraud, often they may point to fraud.
so what happened just before 3am CST in Wisconsin? This did!
Around 3am Wisconsin time, a fresh batch of 169k new absentee ballots arrived. They were supposed to stop accepting new ballots, but eh, whatever I guess.
By 4am the D to R ratio was all thrown out of whack. That is because these ballots were not sampled from the real Wisconsin voter population, and they were not randomized in the mail sorting system with the other ballots. They inherently have a different D to R signature...
than the rest of the ballots quite possibly bc additional ballots were added to the batch, either through backdating or ballot manufacturing or software tampering. This of this being kind of analogous to carbon-14 dating, but for ballot batch authenticity.
lets look at another anomaly: Image
Here is Pennsylvania's vote counting history. For the first part of the vote counting process, we see the same pattern for mail-in ballots that we've seen in every other state in the country, which is relatively stable D to R ratio that gradually drifts R as more ballots...
come in from rural outlying areas.

But then as counting continues, the D to R ratio in mail-in ballots inexplicably begin "increasing". Again, this should not happen, and it is observed almost nowhere else in the country, because all of the ballots are randomly shuffled...
in the mail system and should be homogeneous during counting. The only exceptions to this are other suspect states that also have anomalies.
Again, this is evidence of ballot backdating, manufacturing of software tampering.
Lets look at another anomaly: Image
In Georgia we see pretty much the same story as Pennsylvania: increasing fractions of mail-in D ballots over time even though it defies logic and we see this pattern no where else in the country.
In Michigan, we see a combination of Wisconsin strangeness, together with the GA/PA weirdness. We see both signs of contaminated ballot dumping, and ballot ratios drifting toward dems when they should not be. Image
Virginia: Image
Now in fairness, VA is the only state out of the 50 that has anomalies but has not had accusations of voter fraud, yet. I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Yet to figure out what causes this anomalous shift, but here it is so no one accuses me of holding it back.
Lets wrap this up: It appears Dems shot themselves in the foot bc making everyone do mail-in ballots actually makes it easier to catch mail-in ballot fraud. Bc all of the ballots go through the postal system, they get shuffled like a deck of cards, so we expect reported...
ballot return to be extremely UNIFORM in terms of D vs R ratio, but to drift slightly towards R over time bc some of those ballots travel farther. This pattern proves fraud and is a verifiable timestamp of when each fraudulent action occurred.
Please disseminate as necessary. Good luck. Stay safe. Be kind to your neighbors.

#Epsteindidntkillhimself

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with CulturalHusbandry

CulturalHusbandry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @APhilosophae

1 Dec
A legend was made today. This guy was so fucking effective twitter deleted his account halfway through his testimony. Image
Bobby Piton, American Badass

''Not only can I prove they were cheating, I found evidence that it goes back to at least 2008... I reversed engineered their algorithm, there's no doubt in my mind... I'd bet my life on it''
Read 10 tweets
30 Nov
Thread.

People keep asking for a "better", more plain-speak version of the numbers related to Bidens 138,000 ballot dump and the other statistical anomolies we've witnessed. Statistical analysis and charts dont play well to audiences or juries they said. Well, try this on then:
If you were searching for a single specific atom in the entire observable universe - among the trillions of stars and galaxies - you would have a greater chance of finding it than for those votes to have been consecutively counted for Biden.
Not only a greater chance, but if you were trying to find that atom in 10,000 universes, you would still have a greater chance of finding it than the chance of Biden having those votes all in his favor.
Read 12 tweets
27 Nov
Federal election law requires all records r/t federal elections be preserved for 22mo. If the court orders an evidenciary hearing, those records will need to be provided to plaintiffs & court. Places like Cobb Co, Ga; Fulton Co, Ga; Delaware Co, Pa wont be able to do this.
Dominion provides little to no papertrail. If same machines are used in upcoming Ga election then any electronic hx will be wiped. And what was shred? What did Delaware Co destroy? An evidenciary hearing is needed!!
Is the source code available for these machines, and if not, why would election officials accept voting machines running unknown code, possibly performing unknown functions on the ballots?
Read 4 tweets
25 Nov
🚨🚨🚨🚨
What is Draining the Swamp?

It's where we get rid of everyone, Republican or Democrat, that is corrupt - right?

Well here we go. Some are already gone. Some are responsible and havent had their feet held to the fire. Georgia, you're up first.
GEORGIA:

ES&S PAY-FOR-PLAY SCHEMES RUN RAMPANT ACROSS U.S. AS ELECTION OFFICIALS TRADE MILLION DOLLAR VOTER MACHINE CONTRACTS FOR DONATIONS
AND GIFTS
2019:

THE CHIEF OF STAFF TO THE FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE, THE DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF TO THE GOVERNOR, THE HEAD OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS FOR THE FORMER GOVERNOR, THE FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE...
Read 25 tweets
25 Nov
🚨🚨🚨🚨🔥🔥🔥🔥
Here it is. Sourced, complete and
appearing final. They've done it!

@SidneyPowell1 @realDonaldTrump @RichardGrenell @LLinWood @JennaEllisEsq @RudyGiuliani @Barnes_Law

votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anoma…
The time-series data provided by the New York Times provides what appear to be precise vote tallies along with vote proportions which are truncated after three decimal places.
This introduces some imprecision, which becomes more meaningful as the vote total grows. The implications of this and various mechanisms for estimating the true vote total are discussed in the data gathering and processing appendix of this report.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!