There's been a lot of discussion about why MLB tv ratings were down this year with most of the discussion focused on get woke, go broke. While that is certainly a part of it, I think that the herd of elephants trumpeting loudly and trampling about is being very pointedly ignored.
The Astros cheated and the only consequence to the players involved was that they won a World Series. That's it. Yes, yes, there were some punishments here and there but for the players themselves? Not a single damn thing. The lesson there? Cheating is worth it, big time.
The Astros kept that World Series even though it is indisputable that they cheated throughout the season. Why? *handwring handwring* Well, there's no proof it caused them to win the Series and we can't just go back and take it away and the integrity of the game!
I will give MLB this, I do appreciate that my intelligence was insulted directly to my face. I mean, at least there was that amount of decency. This notion that nothing could be done about, I cannot say this enough, outright cheating is ludicrous. But that was MLB's position.
This article by Trevor Bauer is worth a read:… He points out the economic impact on the other players. Analytics is everything in baseball. If someone cheats to increase theirs, that ripples through the entire marketplace.
MLB had hard choices to make. MLB chose not to make them. MLB let cheating slide. Not only that, but MLB made it very clear to the pitchers that if the pitchers attempted to deal with this in the traditional manner, then the pitchers would face sudden and immediate consequences.
MLB made it clear that when it came to punishing a team that cheated during the season and post season, it would not do so because of, well, that's not really clear other than mouth noises about well we just can't take the World Series away! We just can't!
Oh and if the players attempt to enact justice, and it would have been justice, the players will be punished is just the cherry on top of it all. How DARE anyone want there to be actual, long lasting consequences! How DARE they! All you people hurt by this must suck it up.
The result? MLB destroyed its credibility when discussing the integrity of the game. Since the Astros were allowed to keep that World Series, Pete Rose should be in the Hall of Fame tomorrow. After all, there's no true difference in what he did and what the Astros did.
If anyone should have their reputation restored since apparently cheating is fine by MLB, it's Shoeless Joe Jackson. Tell me, tell me true, have you seen any discussion of this in the hand wringing over the ratings collapse? Maybe here and there but it's just not discussed.
I am bringing this up for no reason at all, of course, and not as super bitchy ultra passive aggressive Mean Girl nastiness about lulz you peons who think cheating matters, no matter the level to which it rises lulz. No other reason at all.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with alexandriabrown

alexandriabrown Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alexthechick

9 Nov
I see the new hotness on the "Right" is that meh voter fraud happens every election whatchugonnado? I don't know, maybe, just spit balling here, at any time over the past 60 years any of y'all being so blase about this could have STOPPED IT YOU PATHETIC COWARDS!
You know what else you could have done, you spineless pieces of ambergris? You could have demanded that those engaging in it must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. You could have thrown your support to clearing out voter roles. You could have aided True The Vote.
Another thing you could have done? Is defending, with vigor mirroring the apathy with which you are shrugging eh it happens, those who said voter fraud is real. Funny, I don't remember seeing a single solitary one of you True Conservative Defenders Of The Base doing so.
Read 4 tweets
9 Nov
I shall now tell a story that summarizes my response to this let us all come together in unity that is said every time a Democrat wins. I don't come across particularly well in this story, but, well, I'm not a particularly nice or good person no matter how hard my parents tried.
I attended a very small high school. How small? There were under 100 people and the school was grades 7-12. There were 13 people in my graduating class. By the by, out of those 13, 12 went to college. Of the 12 that went to college, 9 of us have graduate degrees.
The most successful one of us? The guy who barely graduated and who went off to be a plumber and who started his own plumbing business and who was a millionaire by early 30's and employs like 75 people now but that's another story.
Read 22 tweets
5 Nov
In which I peeve everyone because I'm awesome like that. I've stopped reading whatever is going on. I don't care about the lawsuits. I don't care about the vote totals and oh these were found and tee hee hee look at our adorable volunteers forgetting to hit upload omg so cute!
No matter who wins, the result is tainted. I won't believe it if Trump wins. I won't believe it if Biden wins. I won't believe it because all of this is unbelievable. And inevitable. Systems stress to failure and the system has failed. We're talking this level of failure.
This has been decades in the making. Decades. Sure, let's start with Nixon and JFK and 1960 and WV because we have to start somewhere but it's not like vote counting shenanigans are anything new. The jokes about voting in Chicago are Borscht Belt era old.
Read 19 tweets
28 Oct
Let's chat about this BUT BUT BUT BIDEN AND DECENCY AND THHHHHHEEEEE CCCCHIIIIILLLDDDDRRRRRREEEENNNN and whatever amount of contempt you think I have for this idiotic mouth braying you have no idea. And I'm not even talking about Biden's hair sniffing ways.
Here's what the decency DECENCY wine guzzling gossip mongering deacon's wives nice contingent means by decency: no one ever says anything that's not passive aggressive bitchy and we all pretend that there's just one way, one upper middle class way, of doing things.
Don't you dare point out anything that will upset anyone in any way. Don't you DARE say something that responds to the aggressive part of the passive aggressive. Don't you even contemplate pondering thinking about confronting someone who is an utter bitch to you. How DARE you!
Read 9 tweets
22 Oct
Okay so here are the four responses I see to this:

1. He's lying. Possible but not probable. This statement doesn't actually make him look that good. I wanted to include the possibility of lying though. Be the most skeptical of statements supporting what you want to believe.
2. He's telling the truth and he was duped by the Biden. Possible but only sort of probable. That email is from 2017 and the statement makes clear that he knew since at least 2017 that Hunter was trading on Joe's influence. That doesn't sound like someone being duped to me.
3. He's telling the truth and he's trying to get ahead that he's known since 2017 at least that Joe Biden acted inappropriately. This is where I am leaning. It doesn't say when he was brought into Sinohawk Holdings and it doesn't way when he saw firsthand Hunter talking to Joe.
Read 6 tweets
14 Oct
I've been offline most of today dealing with health issues and I come back to find that the NY Post, which I know, I know, how declasse, but still a major American paper, has posted a story with some Sources Say stuff but also embeds and links to the putative original materials.
And Our Betters at the various socials have lost their minds and UNVERIFIED and HOW DARE YOU and on and on and are literally pulling down posts with links to the story (why no link here) but I'm supposed to believe that there's no shenanigans with influencing the election, no sir
Pull the other one, it's got bells on it. Look, it's very fair to find it a wee bit suspicious that an unnamed shop owner had a MacBook from an unnamed person who may or may not be Hunter Biden and it's all conveniently coming out now. That's beyond fair, that's necessary.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!