𝙂𝙐𝙈𝘽𝙔 Profile picture
Nov 12, 2020 7 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Michael Osterholm, who's now been appointed to Biden's COVID-19 team, was a consultant to the Bush administration's "investigation" into the 2001 anthrax attacks who helped downplay the possibility that the attacks were conducted by a government insider. ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/per… Image
On the day of the first anthrax attack, Osterholm was quoted in a CNN article, pumping up the threat of a smallpox attack. Smallpox, of course, was the weapon at the center of the Operation Dark Winter bio-terror simulation conducted earlier that year. cnn.com/2001/US/09/17/… Image
Last year, Osterholm was the primary expert cited in a Washington Post article attempting to debunk Kris Newby's book, Bitten, which investigates the origins of Lyme disease in the US bio-weapons program. The article contained a revealing disclosure. washingtonpost.com/history/2019/0… Image
Osterholm knew and worked with Willie Burgdorfer!

As Newby's book documents, Burgdorfer bred fleas, ticks and mosquitoes and infected them with disease-causing pathogens on behalf of the US BW program. Late in life, he even admitted Lyme was the result of a military experiment.
As @housetrotter points out, Osterholm was escalating fears of a bio-terror attack a year before the anthrax attacks occurred.
Interestingly, though, Osterholm was (AFAIK) one of the first mainstream public health officials ("an insider," as he tells us) to reveal how ineffective flu shots are. "It's all a sales job: it's all public relations." well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/05/rea… Image
Why did this rather startling information come from such a consummate "insider" like Osterholm? Perhaps it was to set the stage for a big new push for a universal flu vaccine. Tony Fauci and Bill Gates were behind such a push as well. minnpost.com/health/2019/01… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 𝙂𝙐𝙈𝘽𝙔

𝙂𝙐𝙈𝘽𝙔 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gumby4christ

May 3
🧵Interesting moment from the Covid Select Subcommittee's interrogation of Peter Daszak I'd like to unpack.

Daszak claims DARPA didn't reject DEFUSE due to safety concerns but rather over its cost. (He's previously made this claim to The Intercept, but now does so under oath.)
Daszak says "the only information we received from DARPA about the reasons for turning us down" came during an exit interview. Daszak previously described this interview as an apparently voluntary process for those who didn't receive funding. theintercept.com/2022/03/11/cov…
Image
This begs the question (previously raised by @Rossana38510044) as to whether the unsigned, undated DARPA rejection letter released by DRASTIC is completely authentic. And, if authentic, was it ever sent to EcoHealth or was it only a draft?
Read 10 tweets
Jan 17
The talking point from lab-leak proponents is that DARPA rejected EcoHealth's DEFUSE proposal because it was too risky. (If you read the letter closely, it's not clear this is true.) However, in a March 2, 2018 meeting, DARPA reviewer Jim Gimlett did not raise any risk concerns. Image
Gimlett did, however, note that DARPA was not able to fund all proposals and may partially fund proposals or fund later stages of proposals. This gibes with the letter written (though not signed) by Gimlett which noted "several components" of DEFUSE were "potentially fundable."
Image
Image
Gimlett also noted in his 3/2/18 meeting with Daszak that one of the primary issues with DEFUSE was validation. Lack of validation was one of the reasons cited for rejecting DEFUSE. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 17
Last month, @emilyakopp of @USRightToKnow published an article about the infamous DEFUSE proposal based on documents obtained from USGS, a DEFUSE partner. However, USRTK uploaded only a portion of those records.

I have obtained the full FOIA cache: archive.org/details/2021-0…
@emilyakopp @USRightToKnow Scientist and natural-origin proponent @flodebarre also appears to have obtained the same cache of documents. She too has refused to publish the full batch, instead plucking out small excerpts in support of this thread:
@emilyakopp @USRightToKnow @flodebarre (If you can't see the quoted tweet above, that's because Flo blocked me months ago.)
Read 8 tweets
Sep 1, 2023
I do not in any way agree with GoFundMe taking down the Grayzone's fundraiser, but, since I've yet to see anyone else mention it, I do think it's worth putting on the record that Max Blumenthal has reportedly agitated for such takedowns in the past. observer.com/2016/01/its-on…
Image
The Observer article reports that Max "pressured" GoFundMe to remove a fundraiser by (virulently pro-Israel pseudo-rabbi) Shmuley Boteach to buy a NYT ad tying then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to Max via his dad, long-time Clinton consigliere Sidney Blumenthal. Image
However, the Observer's only apparent source is Boteach himself who merely said he "believes" Max contacted GoFundMe directly, just as he had written to Huffington Post editor Ryan Grim to decry an op-ed attacking him written by Boteach. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 26, 2023
Two months after dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US military began drafting a secret plan to nuke 20 Soviet Cities in a "prevenative" surprise attack without provocation or warning. https://t.co/0glssyr2Jparchive.org/details/isbn_0…
Image
This plan, known as JIC 329 (or "Strategic Vulnerability of the USSR to a Limited Air Attack") acknowledged that the Soviets posed no immediate threat to the US. Decimated by WWII and lacking a navy, the USSR was in a dire position relative to the largely unscathed US military.
Image
Image
Knowing this, JIC 329 recommended a surprise barrage of nuclear strikes if it appeared that the Soviets "would eventually gain the capability of either attacking the US or rebuffing a US attack." (Kaku/Axelrod) Image
Read 21 tweets
Apr 17, 2023
The new Senate Covid-origin report, primarily authored by biodefense ghoul Robert Kadlec, badly misrepresents the data on early circulation.
Kadlec, citing only to the WHO's meta-analysis of studies on early circulation excludes an Italian study included in the WHO report, which found 111/959 pre-pandemic blood samples positive for antibodies dating back to Sept. 2019. cdn.who.int/media/docs/def… ImageImage
This study had been the subject of some controversy, and the WHO report includes a footnote that the samples would be retested to confirm results. That follow-up study was published in Dec. 2021 and corroborated positive results dating back to Oct. 2019. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35062265/ ImageImage
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(