Michael Osterholm, who's now been appointed to Biden's COVID-19 team, was a consultant to the Bush administration's "investigation" into the 2001 anthrax attacks who helped downplay the possibility that the attacks were conducted by a government insider. ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/per…
On the day of the first anthrax attack, Osterholm was quoted in a CNN article, pumping up the threat of a smallpox attack. Smallpox, of course, was the weapon at the center of the Operation Dark Winter bio-terror simulation conducted earlier that year. cnn.com/2001/US/09/17/…
Last year, Osterholm was the primary expert cited in a Washington Post article attempting to debunk Kris Newby's book, Bitten, which investigates the origins of Lyme disease in the US bio-weapons program. The article contained a revealing disclosure. washingtonpost.com/history/2019/0…
Osterholm knew and worked with Willie Burgdorfer!
As Newby's book documents, Burgdorfer bred fleas, ticks and mosquitoes and infected them with disease-causing pathogens on behalf of the US BW program. Late in life, he even admitted Lyme was the result of a military experiment.
As @housetrotter points out, Osterholm was escalating fears of a bio-terror attack a year before the anthrax attacks occurred.
Interestingly, though, Osterholm was (AFAIK) one of the first mainstream public health officials ("an insider," as he tells us) to reveal how ineffective flu shots are. "It's all a sales job: it's all public relations." well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/05/rea…
Why did this rather startling information come from such a consummate "insider" like Osterholm? Perhaps it was to set the stage for a big new push for a universal flu vaccine. Tony Fauci and Bill Gates were behind such a push as well. minnpost.com/health/2019/01…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The talking point from lab-leak proponents is that DARPA rejected EcoHealth's DEFUSE proposal because it was too risky. (If you read the letter closely, it's not clear this is true.) However, in a March 2, 2018 meeting, DARPA reviewer Jim Gimlett did not raise any risk concerns.
Gimlett did, however, note that DARPA was not able to fund all proposals and may partially fund proposals or fund later stages of proposals. This gibes with the letter written (though not signed) by Gimlett which noted "several components" of DEFUSE were "potentially fundable."
Gimlett also noted in his 3/2/18 meeting with Daszak that one of the primary issues with DEFUSE was validation. Lack of validation was one of the reasons cited for rejecting DEFUSE.
Last month, @emilyakopp of @USRightToKnow published an article about the infamous DEFUSE proposal based on documents obtained from USGS, a DEFUSE partner. However, USRTK uploaded only a portion of those records.
@emilyakopp @USRightToKnow Scientist and natural-origin proponent @flodebarre also appears to have obtained the same cache of documents. She too has refused to publish the full batch, instead plucking out small excerpts in support of this thread:
I do not in any way agree with GoFundMe taking down the Grayzone's fundraiser, but, since I've yet to see anyone else mention it, I do think it's worth putting on the record that Max Blumenthal has reportedly agitated for such takedowns in the past. observer.com/2016/01/its-on…
The Observer article reports that Max "pressured" GoFundMe to remove a fundraiser by (virulently pro-Israel pseudo-rabbi) Shmuley Boteach to buy a NYT ad tying then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to Max via his dad, long-time Clinton consigliere Sidney Blumenthal.
However, the Observer's only apparent source is Boteach himself who merely said he "believes" Max contacted GoFundMe directly, just as he had written to Huffington Post editor Ryan Grim to decry an op-ed attacking him written by Boteach.
Two months after dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US military began drafting a secret plan to nuke 20 Soviet Cities in a "prevenative" surprise attack without provocation or warning. https://t.co/0glssyr2Jparchive.org/details/isbn_0…
This plan, known as JIC 329 (or "Strategic Vulnerability of the USSR to a Limited Air Attack") acknowledged that the Soviets posed no immediate threat to the US. Decimated by WWII and lacking a navy, the USSR was in a dire position relative to the largely unscathed US military.
Knowing this, JIC 329 recommended a surprise barrage of nuclear strikes if it appeared that the Soviets "would eventually gain the capability of either attacking the US or rebuffing a US attack." (Kaku/Axelrod)
Kadlec, citing only to the WHO's meta-analysis of studies on early circulation excludes an Italian study included in the WHO report, which found 111/959 pre-pandemic blood samples positive for antibodies dating back to Sept. 2019. cdn.who.int/media/docs/def…
This study had been the subject of some controversy, and the WHO report includes a footnote that the samples would be retested to confirm results. That follow-up study was published in Dec. 2021 and corroborated positive results dating back to Oct. 2019. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35062265/
Someone who wishes to remain anonymous has provided me with a solid English translation of this letter, purportedly written by a former employee of the US-Thai military bio-lab AFRIMS. Please note that the authenticity of the letter cannot be verified. archive.org/details/afrims…
The letter opens with the author's purported background -- an idealistic AFRIMS worker grown jaded by the leadership's indifference to biosafety issues at the lab. The author claims that the onset of the Covid pandemic spurred them to speak out.
The letter alleges that the US enrolled children from Thailand and neighboring countries in a vaccine trial and collected blood samples from them, which were used in "virus experiments" without their consent and without Thai knowledge of the purpose of the experiment.