"Protection from retaliation" is a hilarious addition to a list that starts with "accountability."
I said years and years ago: the basic premise of (critical) identity politics is "notice my identity when it's to my advantage; ignore it when it's not." It's just concocting and leveraging double standards out of whining about power dynamics from the past.
The correct thing here is that there really should be (real) accountability and transparency, and nobody should feel like they're subjected to unreasonable censure or reprisal, but the Woke interpret these things in the most ridiculous and self-serving manner possible.
Imagine if a relatively conservative or even if any evidence-based teacher came forward and spoke up about what's going on with Woke excesses in education and requested accountability and transparency for everything going on. Would that person face retaliation? LOL yes.
When they Woke say they want accountability, what they actually mean is that they want to be able to punish people who aren't Woke, who aren't meeting Woke demands, and who are accused of some trumped-up evil by the Woke.
newdiscourses.com/tftw-accountab…
When the Woke say they want transparency, what they actually mean is that they want everything that disagrees with the Woke made visible so they can punish it.
When the Woke say they want no fear of retaliation, what they mean is that anyone who disagrees with them for any reason, especially firmly, shouldn't be allowed to do so, and that they should have further demands met if anyone, even an anonymous troll with 0 followers, is mean.
The way these things are accomplished in Woke activism is by completely undermining the (usually implicit) reasonable person standard by injecting the ideas of implicit bias and systemic power dynamics into everything. There are no reasonable people to the Woke.
Since no one is reasonable (everyone has biases) and systemic power is a social "reality" that goes against the Woke or their human shields/proxies/"bodies," only the Woke are allowed to set the standards, according to the Woke. Everyone else's bias is self-serving and oppressive
When the woke demand accountability, transparency, and a lack of unjust censure or reprisal for speaking up, this would be perfectly reasonable if we were playing on a field that accepted the idea of a relatively universal reasonable person. The Woke explicitly reject that idea.
People have to wise up really fast to the fact that essentially every significant or actionable word the Woke use, even in apparently plain English, either has two (or more) meanings that allow them equivocate or is fully reinterpreted through power dynamics in a Woke-biased way.
Start here, Grasshopper.
newdiscourses.com/translations-f…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Lindsay, BDEDS

James Lindsay, BDEDS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConceptualJames

16 Nov
When I talk about the Great Reset, which I actually do less than I should, using links directly to its materials, and in a generally circumspect way, I'm called a conspiracy theorist. It's not a conspiracy theory, though it may well be a conspiracy.
Most people think conspiracies are impossible because eventually someone will leak that they're happening. Large groups can't keep them secret. The Great Reset has never been secret, though, nor have the plans it's meant to enable. People just don't believe that they're real.
I'm with you. I don't want to believe the world might be this different than the way I had assumed it was, but it seems to be the case that it is. Nevertheless, don't listen to cranks on the internet about it (like me, maybe). Go look into it for yourself. It's easy to find.
Read 11 tweets
16 Nov
Liberalism is an unstable equilibrium, like balancing a bat on its end on your palm. It will fall over with even a little perturbation, hence the price of liberty being eternal vigilance. Since society moves, it requires constant adjustment, like balancing a bat. It's possible.
Liberalism produces the very progress that constantly threatens to unseat it, but this is among its greatest virtues and what justifies putting the constant energy into its maintenance. Illiberal alternatives either fail at this or risk the "bad emperor" problem.
The reason to support liberalism is because it produces an extremely beneficial admixture of freedom (thus innovation and individual opportunity for actualization) and sociopolitical legitimacy and authority (i.e., few civil wars, in particular).
Read 4 tweets
16 Nov
The University of Alabama, Birmingham, is relying upon its sociology department to determine what in its curriculum and admissions is "racist." They're also setting up a tattletale reporting service. That's not all! ImageImageImage
They'll be reimagining how their honors groups work with equity in mind. They'll also make accommodations for "peaceful protesters" who get arrested.

But wait, there's more! ImageImage
It's all based in the predictable narratives, of course. They're not remotely true, but that ceased mattering some time ago. This is, to remind you, a state university's school of medicine. Reality can be optional there too. ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
16 Nov
Checking out some corporate "diversity" training videos from Paradigm REACH. They're hilariously bad. Here's easily found evidence they misrepresent at least some of the studies they rely upon. Companies making use of this should be embarrassed.
They explicitly say that stereotypes are the reason that people with accents are taken less seriously than people without them (given the dialectical context). The study says directly in the abstract that stereotypes have nothing to do with it, though. They saw what they wanted.
What makes this extra funny is their view on "confirmation bias," which they seem to believe they are incapable of. Being aware of confirmation bias doesn't insulate someone from their own confirmation bias, clearly.
Read 13 tweets
15 Nov
For those who believe today's (Critical) "Social Justice" movement continues the noble work of the Civil Rights Movement, or is about civil rights at all, you should learn that it arose out of the aspects of the 1960s activism that Civil Rights leaders said weren't their movement
The Civil Rights Movement was rooted in liberalism, equality, and universal humanity. The Critical Social Justice movement is rooted in Critical Theory, liberationism, equity, and narrow identity politics in a style formalized in the late 1970s.
It's almost impossible to express how diametrically opposed the Critical Social Justice movement is to the Civil Rights Movement, and people don't believe you even when you show them quotes. The CSJ movement regards the CRM as part of a grand conspiracy to maintain racism, tho.
Read 12 tweets
15 Nov
The lived experience of gender dysphoria tells you SOMETHING is going on with the person experiencing it, but it doesn't tell you what is going on. This is a consequential difference.
Someone having a panic attack is certain they're dying. They may be quite convinced they're having a heart attack. That's their lived experience. It's absolutely wrong, and it would be deadly to treat them as though they were anyway.
Of course, in practice, what's required is handling their reaction in the sense that the emotions that they're experiencing are themselves real. They're really experiencing those. They're not crazy. But their diagnosis of the situation isn't just wrong but is dangerously wrong.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!