1/To conclude: ‘Covid-19 Response’ fund is funded by Amazon, Zoom, FB, NASDAQ, Nintendo, Verizon, Pfizer, Wal-mart, Target... all entities that PROFIT DIRECTLY from ‘lockdown’, from vaccines, some that profit from killing small businesses; it circulates ‘studies’ via Blavatnik
2/ School of Government (wh has restricted access) which @nytimes cited TODAY in support of ‘lockdown.’ Companies that directly profit from ‘lockdown’ are funding propaganda to lead policies that ensure ‘lockdown.’ Biggest closed circle of corrupted medical propaganda in history.
3/‘COVID-19 Response Fund’, funded by Zoom, Amazon, Microsoft, Pfizer, Nintendo, Google, FB, WalMart, all companies that profit directly from ‘lockdown’, fund info via WHO, Blavatnik School of Gov’t (@nytimes cited TODAY) re COVID-19. @nytimes u need to withdraw Blavatnik charts

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Dr Naomi Wolf

Dr Naomi Wolf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @naomirwolf

31 Oct
1/This is biggest story of our century and no one but ⁦@StefSimanowitz⁩ is reporting it....Palantir, other creepy tech giants, got contract to manage COVID data in UK and built a genomics ‘COVID data store’ to monetize your biotech data...’lockdowns’, mass tests, tracing..
2/..may have med benefit but speaking as CEO of a data tech company, I tell your the data extruded from you while you are on ‘lockdown’, tested and traced, is unbelievably valuable. Your working from home data is valuable, your kids being isolated online data are valuable, it’s..
3/..a hack. Big tech companies with friends in govt (and perhaps in alignment w a non Allied superpower) have used med crisis to hack society and drive it all online via ‘lockdowns’. The data they are mining is so vastly valuable. Killing the last ‘analog’ spaces..bookstores, ..
Read 9 tweets
27 Oct
‘Neither Oxford not its ..partner Astra Zeneca would release the data’ from vaccine tests it is claiming are successful. Why is NO COVID related data available transparently for scrutiny? Why not let journalists, other scientists see datasets as is norm? theguardian.com/world/2020/oct…
2/Why do I keep hammering that no COVID related platform releases datasets? Because I run a small tech company that sells data. And I know that data platforms can slice and dice and tag the data on the backend to tell any story on the front end, they want. Why I keep demanding...
3/ that reporters such a @apoorva_nyc and others (not to single you out @apoorva_nyc) MUST educate themselves about the backend of these data platforms such as @COVID19Tracking and @JHS that they are all citing, respectfully, totally blindly. Just because there’s a map based on..
Read 16 tweets
19 Sep
To be clear: I’m not ‘anti-vax’. That said, I had flu shot for 1st time, at CVS. Had to ask for 4 layers of documentation before learning that dog kidney cells, latex, Singapore H1N1 are in shot, and that CDC has only vague assurances re dog cells studies. cdc.gov/flu/prevent/ce…
2/ Also learned: 1st doc I was asked to sign did away w/my medical privacy under HIPAA law: lets CVS send my personally identifying data to ‘agencies’ and ‘schools’. Also something called CAIR gets to release it, which pharmacist could not identify. CVS like Rite Aid sells data.
3/ I was asked to pay and sign before seeing prescription label. Label only said ‘flu vaccine’, not ingredients. Only when I asked for ingredients was I given box w actual label which you are supposed to get by law. It listed dog cells, latex, H1N1 virus from Singapore in shot.
Read 4 tweets
13 Sep
"Manufactured claims of incompetence and malfeasance [...] have emerged as the [climate][ denialist weapon of choice." @MichaelEMann, The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars. Describes how fake/ hyped "scandal" re scholarship is fed to allies who write blogs in online echo chamber.
2/Strategy includes abuse of FOIA, to burden scientists with intrusive demands for records, impeding their research. @MichaelEMann, The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars
3/Climate denialist McIntyre demanded via FOIA all email correspondence between a well-known climate scientist Ben Santer and his coauthors. Intrusive and intimidating.
Read 15 tweets
9 Sep
4/Which is how the right wing manages to silence dissent of impactful influencers by challenging their preferred outcomes. Military calls this "tenderizing" a target, leaving one so occupied with putting out reputational fires that one can't advance one's own powerful agendas.
5/Another issue: targets such as scientists, scholars, often play by civilized rules, calling biased editors "unusual" or sticking to pointing out flaws in methodologies. But echo chamber uses lies, personal attacks, reputational smears, catchy namecalling; blindsiding civility.
6/Loc 2576 of The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars should chill your soul: @MichelEMann explains how pressures from fossil fuel, pharmaceuticals, tobacco etc corrupt peer review. Peer review's importance he notes cannot be overstated; a last bastion of actual truth not spin.
Read 21 tweets
9 Sep
1/ Fossil-fuel allied scientists write letter to Pres of UVA, where @MichaelMann was teaching, complaining re his Senate testimony. Many influencers now endure calls to publishers, employers, university heads when we bring out messages that contradict right wing agendas.Loc 2559,
2/The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars, @MichaelEMann. Literally everyone should read this book. Searing indictment of how climate change scientists are harassed, targeted, silenced by "vast right wing conspiracy" of echo chamber talking heads, special interests, fake news sites
3/ So @MichaelEMann, who is only identifying evidence that can lead to policies that allow us to sustain life on earth, has to take time from his research and peer reviewed publications to RESPOND to a letter from fossil fuel allied scientists to the then-pres of his university.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!