EZ Profile picture
21 Nov, 11 tweets, 5 min read
As many people know, in a New York minute, @PsychToday published, and than swiftly removed an article about trans-identified young people disowning their parents-a known fact to the parents, but apparently a novel narrative to the happily uninitiated /1
.archive.is/hhMDv
The article was pulled within minutes, after what looked like a coordinated attack by the TRAs. Comments from grateful and concerned parents were drowned out by the "How dare yous". Not surprising to anyone anymore, is it? /2

psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/agai…
The comments illustrate perfectly what's going on in the gender debate. It's not hard to see who the unhinged bully is, and who is the reasonable voice in this conversation. But we live in the world were bullies win. /3
"Irresponsible, damaging, disgusting, vile" - a crowd of TRAs piles on within minutes of the article going live, all reaching for the same few words. /4
The TRAs are appalled it was published on Trans remembrance day. But on that day, many bereaved parents are mourning not the death of their loved one by suicide (as the narrative dictates), but because the young person's cut off all family contact-an act encouraged by the TRAs./5
TRA comments go and and on; 20 minutes later, the parents (aka "adults") arrive. It's hard to see the transphobic parent narrative being accurate. Judge for yourself: /6
A plea from parents for psychological exploration of the "suddenly trans" teen phenomenon, before one proceeds to cut off body parts, is countered with the false but powerful "dead son or happy daughter" (or increasingly, the other way around) dichotomy. /7
This is the other side of the "dead son/ happy daughter" argument, which powerfully weaponizes the rare events of suicide to bully parents into experimental and drastic medical interventions. This parent did not ask for psychological exploration, and did "everything right." /8
Back to the comments. Do these responses strike you as transphobic? Bigoted? /9
But of course, the writing is on the wall--both for the author and for @PsychToday , and everyone knows it. /10
Welcome to 1984, folks! Best wishes for the coming New Year!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EZ

EZ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZaneEmma

13 Oct
You re not paranoid. The TRA movement going after our kids' bodies is operating from a play book, which has been published by Thomson Reuters. Key strategies include "De-medicalise the campaign" (#2) "Avoid excessive press coverage and exposure" (# 8). /1 iglyo.com/wp-content/upl…
The other side has been incredibly effective at the complete institutional takeover. Let's learn from the best, shall we?

Rule #1: Target youth politicians.
"Main wings of political parties are often keen to listen to youth wings."

@AOC you are in the playbook, as the pawn. /2
Rule #2. De-medicalise the campaign.
"It was observed that the public often finds it difficult to accept irreversible surgeries until the age of maturity" and thus may be "apprehensive" to support gender laws for minors.

Let's make the public not notice where this road leads./3
Read 13 tweets
12 Oct
A new and important thread on r/detrans. A young male, questioning his transition after 10 yrs. Believes his underlying mental health problems led to an unstable identity and created the void for trans ideation to take over. Many detransitioners agree/. /1
reddit.com/r/detrans/comm…
A female desister talks about how her OCD and social anxiety led to trans identification. Stopped at 23. /2
Another voice of a detransitioner, who calls out that trans ideation for many lifts in mid-20's. /3
Read 7 tweets
24 Sep
Wondering if the rumored Mermaids' expansion into the US is tied to the UK's announcement today that UK schools should not use education materials by third parties that equate gender non-conformity w/ trans and that bodies need changing. /1
If I were the head of Mermaids, I would definitely be looking to refocus operations on the US and its Wild West of gender medicine. The UK seems to be waking up: the NHS is independently reviewing evidence on hormonal treatments for youth (not willing to accept WPATH SOC); /2
The NHS removed links the Mermaids, and changed the "puberty blockers are safe and reversible" to "unknown with possible brain and bone adverse effects." Now the government cautions schools to cease the use of materials that pathologize gender-non-conforming behaviors as trans /3
Read 5 tweets
17 Sep
The study that Jack Turban is writing about is another troubled convenience sample with strange results.
Net-net: 738 respondents (out of 2784) knew someone who died by suicide. Of these 738 known deaths, only 172 (23%) were trans people. The rest - 77% - were "cis suicides". /1
What do we make of the finding that the vast majority (8 in 10) of suicides that trans survey participants know of were by "cis" people? And that those participants were "non-binary" females? Other that it's a highly flawed survey and a bad sample describing a troubled group? /2
Little is said regarding recruitment methods beyond the survey being sponsored by a trans suicide hotline organization. It would be temping to recruit from past trans suicide hotline callers. Fishing from the numerator will overstate population exposure./3 medium.com/@Translifeline…
Read 5 tweets
10 Sep
Dr. Kalin at @APAPubJournals. Thanks for listening to the concerned scientists and asking for a reanalysis of the Brandstrom study, and for publishing a correction. But why is the original study with uncorrected, misleading title and conclusion still on?/1
ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.117…
Can you really stand by the study's title? "Reduction in Mental Health Treatment Utilization Among Transgender Individuals After Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A Total Population Study"? Or its conclusions? They directly contradict the reanalysis and your own editorial./2 Image
Dr. Kalin, your correction says, "the results [of the reanalysis] demonstrated no advantage of surgery in relation to subsequent mood or anxiety disorder-related healthcare visits or prescriptions or hospitalizations following suicide attempts". /3
Read 4 tweets
5 Sep
Dr. Kalin of @uwsmph, the editor the AJP, followed up on concerns raised by scientists re: methodology issues in a major trans health study. This resulted in a publication of a correction to a key, erroneous claim: No objective benefit of SRS on mental health has been found. /1
But the original study's permeated medical literature, public health eduction, and medical eduction. How does one put toothpaste back into the tube? What's the @APAPubJournals's obligation to correct the original study's actual title and conclusions, which are still misleading?/2 Image
Not a single study to date has demonstrated long-term objective health benefits of hormones or surgeries. Not a problem, though. According to trans researchers, since the problem is not objectively verifiable, we shouldn't look for objective evidence of success of a solution. /3 Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!