To clarify: I do not know if there was widespread voter fraud, and neither do you. There may have been, and that may yet be seen (in time or too late). There may have been and that may never be seen (it could have been hidden well, or Trump's team may lack the required evidence).
The more thoroughly and seriously this issue is investigated, the more confidence we can have about the issue. The ambiguity is immensely damaging in and of itself, thus warranting an investigation.

It's not complicated.
To spell it out even more simply, some possibilities:

1) No fraud (good)

2) A little fraud (bad but kinda irrelevant)
2a) Provable little fraud (should be found anyway and fixed)
2b) They got away with it (bad)
3) Significant fraud (bad)
3a) Provable (must be found and dealt with legally and fixed)
3b) Provable but goes unproved (say, due to a dumbass legal team, etc., or being hidden well)
3c) Unprovable (hidden too well)
3c1) Circumstantial traces left anyway
3c2) Or not.
4) Widespread fraud (even worse)
Same subcategories as above, with the lesser circumstances all possible within the "unproved" subdivisions under this one.

My point is that you don't know, I don't know, and we may never know which of these things is true. Knowing more is better.
My other point is that the more thorough the investigation, the more of these things become less or not ambiguous, which increases confidence in the result and the process, which very probably needs cleaning up in any case to prevent this mess from happening again.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Lindsay, thicker than two short planks, tbf

James Lindsay, thicker than two short planks, tbf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConceptualJames

24 Nov
There's a "research" paper about this from 2010 by Annie Potts called something like "The Essence of the Hard-on." @peterboghossian and I never stopped laughing. We haven't even slowed down. (@HPluckrose tutted loudly and often)
Maybe it's from 2000. It's been a while. 😂😂☠️☠️☠️
Read 4 tweets
23 Nov
I'm to understand that for @SamHarrisOrg to consider Biden a threat on par with Trump, he'd have to tweet support for a conspiracy theory. Black Lives Matter is demonstrably a conspiracy theory, called liberationism, built on a tower of transparent lies.
rocanews.com/blog-posts/is-…
Here's a relevant example, though a fair percentage of everything he's said or tweeted about "systemic racism," "racial equity," and "racial justice" also qualifies.
In that clip, Biden explicitly connects Covid-19 to systemic racism. This is a conspiracy theory. It is a conspiracy theory that has led our schools of public health and many public officials to declare "systemic racism" a "public health threat" demanding immediate action.
Read 6 tweets
23 Nov
The hill I'm dying on here is the extremely reasonable "do not conclude things you don't know yet" hill. It's a common one to die on, as it turns out.
I suppose I could also be dying on the "omg, y'all, millions of people firmly believe this election was stolen and if we don't take that shit seriously and do something about it other than pretend they're all stupid and crazy, we'll pay for it" hill too. That's a good one, tho.
I think fondly back to the times this year when people told me not to die on the hills where Covid was popularly assessed to have ended Wokeness and also where Amy Cooper got her life ruined over an awkward encounter in Central Park, which really wasn't bad enough for that.
Read 6 tweets
22 Nov
A message to all people who think like this: If something is true, it will stand up to scrutiny. If it doesn't, and there is no proof to support a POV, an intelligent person realizes they must change their mind. OJ was innocent, and there is no proof of a double murder. Think
I'm not saying there was widespread election fraud. I'm saying that no one is under any obligation to believe it, given the circumstances, until an extremely thorough and deep investigation that probably won't happen is conducted. You're making your own damn beds.
Literally the second the counting stopped in several key states at once late into election night (the morning after, technically), a very thorough investigation became demanded to vet this election. Whether you like it or not, that's how it is, and rhetoric can't change it.
Read 7 tweets
18 Nov
"Protection from retaliation" is a hilarious addition to a list that starts with "accountability."
I said years and years ago: the basic premise of (critical) identity politics is "notice my identity when it's to my advantage; ignore it when it's not." It's just concocting and leveraging double standards out of whining about power dynamics from the past.
The correct thing here is that there really should be (real) accountability and transparency, and nobody should feel like they're subjected to unreasonable censure or reprisal, but the Woke interpret these things in the most ridiculous and self-serving manner possible.
Read 12 tweets
16 Nov
When I talk about the Great Reset, which I actually do less than I should, using links directly to its materials, and in a generally circumspect way, I'm called a conspiracy theorist. It's not a conspiracy theory, though it may well be a conspiracy.
Most people think conspiracies are impossible because eventually someone will leak that they're happening. Large groups can't keep them secret. The Great Reset has never been secret, though, nor have the plans it's meant to enable. People just don't believe that they're real.
I'm with you. I don't want to believe the world might be this different than the way I had assumed it was, but it seems to be the case that it is. Nevertheless, don't listen to cranks on the internet about it (like me, maybe). Go look into it for yourself. It's easy to find.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!