Right-wing media is now absolutely completely consumed by anti-voting machine hysteria. I have to tell you, I’m okay with this! If their anxiety results in more thorough audit trails and a determination to keep these machines updated and with paper verification, it’s good!
It is, as always, basically impossible to search Google for any subject that’s currently in the news and be able to find any historical record, but tech professionals, civil rights organizations and democrats have been raising concerns about abuse for years...
... stating that it’s important to have clear auditability, the ability for people voting to be able to check their votes on paper slips before they submit them (the benefit here being that it’s faster to machine-count machine-created ballots) ...
... and for some kind of national standard of quality and trustworthiness for voting machines. As I understand it, this has actually improved a lot over the last few years - but IIRC even now 10% of voting machines don’t create auditable paper records.
Again from memory (because Christ knows how I search for it right now), Republicans have often been explicitly *against* this extended verifiability - with at least one of the 2020 swing states’ Republican administrators arguing explicitly *against* paper audit trails in the past
Now, there has been no evidence of any significant voter fraud in the US in the 2020 election. And—again—these machines and the processes around them have been a lot more secure and verifiable this time than in probably any previous election they’ve been used.
But if current Republican hysteria means that we can recommend national standards, recommend best practices, make sure every vote is verifiable and auditable and keep these devices up to date and safe... I mean... FINALLY?!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Coates

Tom Coates Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tomcoates

26 Nov
If you want to know what the Trump administration has been about, then read this list of ‘midnight regulations’ that they’re trying to implement in their final days in office. I’ll post a few of them below. projects.propublica.org/trump-midnight…
The Trump administration is expected to move forward plans to make families of noncitizen immigrants ineligible for subsidized housing. Image
The Trump administration is expected to move forward plans to increase the speed at which chickens may be slaughtered by putting workers at higher risk of amputations. Image
Read 12 tweets
24 Nov
I may be in a minority here, but I don’t think there’s *any* way to do an investigation of the Trump administration’s abuses that is coordinated or organized in any way from a Biden appointee.
Do I think his administration needs or requires investigation. Absolutely. Without question. Yes. Do I think he did appalling things. Absolutely. Without question. Yes. But if a Biden appointed AG starts it, it will *always* be viewed as a partisan attack ...
... and it will necessarily increase the sense that the AG and the Federal government is a tool that you can use to attack your political enemies.
Read 9 tweets
23 Nov
So a few key states are supposed to be certifying their results today. Trump is leaning hard on the GOP members to not certify the results, which drive the conclusions to state courts or delay them so Congress ends up choosing the President by state delegation.
As always, we need to be clear about what’s happening. Joe Biden won six million more votes than Donald Trump. He won 306 Electoral college votes from the states vs 232 for Trump. There is no evidence of voter fraud.
And yet Trump and the Republican Party are working incredibly hard to deny reality, lie through their teeth and find a way to force themselves to stay in power. It is no more and no less than an attempted coup.
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct
I feel like Pete Buttigieg would have better hair if he spent maybe $40 on a haircut. $16 feels like he’s worried people are going to call him gay if he uses moisturizer.
Like, get over it dude. It’s okay for men to groom nowadays (says the man who hasn’t gone to a hairdresser since February and does it all at home with a hedge trimmer).
That the first person to like this was @monteiro makes me genuinely concerned that I’ve been too rude.
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
Current opinion: absolutely *nothing* will stop this country drifting into fascism and chaos medium term unless we find a way to bring primarily poor, racist, scared, angry white people back into the reality-based community.
I can only think that means a heavy investment in education, clear regulation of social media, and ideally the reinstitution of Reagan-era broadcast news rules. But quite a lot of that stuff would be highly unpopular.
This brings me back to an earlier conversation which is that the role of news media has to shift a bit now to not simply be a reporter of what’s being said and who’s doing what, but to be a continual bulwark of defense of truth, always centering that goal above any other.
Read 6 tweets
14 Sep
@IngrahamAngle Did anyone actually read the law? Literally *all it does* is make things treat LGBT people and straight people the same way. That’s it.
@IngrahamAngle California law allows judges in *certain circumstances* to not put people on sex offender registries if - say - they’re really similar ages but either side of the age of consent. For example it’s a seventeen year old boy and an eighteen year old girl.
@IngrahamAngle But at the moment that only applies to vaginal penetrative intercourse and so cannot apply to same sex couples. Literally *ALL THIS LAW DOES* is make it so the judge can decide not to put people on a sex offender register if they’re same sex.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!