John Inazu Profile picture
Nov 26, 2020 16 tweets 4 min read
Last night, SCOTUS issued injunctive relief to houses of worship challenging NYC’s COVID-19 restrictions, the first time it has granted such relief during the pandemic. I have mixed views about the decision and early reactions to it.
First, unlike @kurtlash1, I don’t see this as an “enormously important religious liberty opinion”—it is fairly fact-specific injunctive relief, and the nature and scope of pandemic orders vary greatly around the country. It’s hard to generalize much here. twitter.com/kurtlash1
I’m concerned that public messaging about the Court’s decision might fuel a broader culture wars narrative from people like John MacArthur who insist “there is no pandemic” and continue to hold services for 7,000 unmasked people. baptistnews.com/article/macart…
That said, I think the Court’s conclusion is correct and makes some important observations, including that these orders cause irreparable harm because they involve restrictions of First Amendment freedoms, and that virtual worship is not a constitutionally sufficient alternative.
In other words, worship is absolutely an “essential activity” and to say otherwise is constitutionally incorrect and politically unwise. The NYC order and others like it should not be classifying worship as non-essential. Of course worship is essential.
The Court is also right to note that this order is more restrictive of worship than the earlier Calvary Chapel (Nevada) and South Bay (California) orders for which the Court denied injunctive relief.
But I think Justice Gorsuch gets too cute in his concurrence comparing worship services to bike shops and liquor stores: “at least according to the Governor, it may be unsafe to go to church, but it is always fine to pick up another bottle of wine, shop for a new bike . . .”
Picking up a bottle of wine and attending a lengthy worship service don’t seem to me like comparable activities when we consider where people are located, how they’re moving, and what they’re doing.
I also think Gorsuch’s critique of Chief Justice Roberts’s concurrence in South Bay is overblown. I thought Roberts was right in South Bay. (It’s also pretty clear that Barrett matters here.)
Gorsuch notes that we are past the pandemic’s early stages and we now know much more about the virus. But it’s not clear which way that cuts.
On the one hand, many houses of worship are taking precautions that appear to be highly effective (as noted by the evidence presented in this case), and certainly better than activities like in-person dining.
On the other hand, the dire rates of transmission and the role that indoor gatherings are playing suggest that even more restrictions may be coming. That's another reason I think it’s best to view the Court's decision as limited and fact-specific.
The elephant in the room is all of the latitude given restaurants and bars, whose activities seem far worse for the pandemic than limited-number, masked, indoor worship. I think @amandamull’s analysis here is both accurate and discouraging: theatlantic.com/health/archive…
As @amandamull writes: “Why can’t a governor or mayor just be honest? There’s no help coming from the Trump administration, the local coffers are bare, and as a result, concessions are being made to business owners . . . even if hospitals start to fill up again.”
That’s bad news for the pandemic, but it also weakens government responses to constitutional claims by houses of worship. Keeping restaurants and bars open is not the same as keeping Home Depot open.
That said, I’m encouraged that many, many houses of worship continue to comply voluntarily (including, in many cases, when orders have exempted them). That’s a tangible sign of loving one’s neighbor, even at great cost. Happy Thanksgiving.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Inazu

John Inazu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnInazu

Apr 23
A thread on this recent report from @GroveCtyCollege. As a private religious college, Grove City can set its own norms. But if it wants to be a credible institution of higher learning, it also needs to reflect some of the norms of academic inquiry. gcc.edu/Portals/0/Spec…
The balance between maintaining a distinctive missional identity (religious or otherwise) and honoring principles of academic freedom and intellectual inquiry is not always easy to strike. But based on this report, Grove City hasn't even come close.
And the gratuitous hit job on @JemarTisby is unbecoming of an institution purporting to model serious intellectual inquiry.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 14, 2021
I've been thinking a lot about this @JemarTisby tweet. A short thread . . .
It’s worth nothing that some of Jemar’s critics insist on linking his most controversial views to Critical Race Theory rather than just engaging with his arguments.
But when it comes to last week’s insurrection, the “Jericho March” that preceded it, and inflammatory statements by prominent evangelicals like Metaxas and Hawley, I don’t see these same critics looking for connections to Christian nationalism.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 8, 2021
A thread on @HawleyMO’s First Amendment tweet last night. My thoughts might also apply to some of Josh’s other legal claims (including his views on the electoral process), but since my expertise is the First Amendment, I’ll stick to that.
Lots of people dragging Josh for not knowing First Amendment basics. I don’t think that’s the right response. He knows what he’s doing.
It’s also not clear to me that Josh is lying outright in the same way that Trump lies, at least with this tweet. Legal doctrines are not the same as observable facts. But what Josh is doing here and in other contexts is in some ways more dangerous.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(