Scott Coley Profile picture
Nov 27, 2020 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
For over four decades, American evangelicals have embraced the special-interest paradigm of political engagement—arguing, in effect, that the interests of Christians should take priority over conflicting claims of other interest groups.

This has been a terrible mistake.
If there is objective moral truth then there is objective truth about what people deserve and what we owe to each other—which is to say, justice.

Objective moral truth entails objective truth about justice. It’s as simple as that.
And if there is objective truth about justice, then our efforts in the political sphere should conform to that truth—which is to say, achieving justice should be our only political objective.

Any other goal would be immoral.
So when we claim to believe in objective moral truth and yet we take a special-interest approach to politics, our actions contradict what we claim to believe. We have no integrity.
That’s how we arrive at a place where many Christians claim to be pro-life, while celebrating the license to engage in conduct that will absolutely, without any doubt, lead to thousands and perhaps even tens-of-thousands of avoidable human deaths.
And that’s how evangelicals have led our nation into the political abyss: instead of pointing our countrymen toward justice, they’ve spent the last 40 years whining about their rights as Christians.
The reason that our nation is disintegrating before our eyes is that we, as a society, lack a shared conception of justice—a common understanding of what people deserve and what we owe to each other.
So although Americans share a patch of earth, we do not share a horizon: we've degenerated into a collection of special interest groups whose highest political aspiration is to secure benefits for ourselves and those like us.
But Christianity isn't a special interest group at all, except insofar as Christians are commanded to identify our interests with the pursuit of justice.
What will save our republic is a political reformation that calls our attention to the truth about justice—a reformation that the Church is uniquely positioned to lead, if only Christians would stop behaving like a special interest group in the public sphere.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Coley

Scott Coley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scott_m_coley

Jun 27
Note that this is all stuff this guy just made up.

The evangelical marketplace of ideas is resplendent with the uncultivated intuitions of theological entrepreneurs…

1/ Image
promoting “biblical” perspectives on geology, political theory, developmental psychology, economics, critical race theory, psychopharmacology, gender and sexuality, media and entertainment, public health, and on and on.

2/
Under the guise of subjecting human reason to biblical scrutiny, American evangelicals have transformed Christian theology into a nomadic culture war
machine:

3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 28
Within authoritarian ecosystems, men in power often lie about their opponents in a way that desensitizes their audience to some unpalatable truth about themselves. Image
Here Joe implies that David French and Russ Moore hold liberal democratic norms on par with scripture—an obvious falsehood.

True to form, Joe doesn’t state the falsehood explicitly—he merely implies it in a way that any competent language user understands.
(French or Moore might claim that modern liberal democracy is rooted in the Christian intellectual tradition, or that liberal norms can be derived from biblical norms. Not sure exactly what their respective views are here, but:
Read 9 tweets
Feb 4
It’s obvious that “this book isn’t meant to be read” doesn’t imply “I haven’t read this book.”

So obvious that one has to wonder: “How could any literate person draw such an inference?”

I have no idea, so I’ll let you and your friends wrestle with that question.

That said,
The substantive point is not in dispute: you didn’t read the book prior to commenting on it.

Here you speculate about what arguments are likely to be presented in the book (see screenshot—same screenshot from before, with relevant portion circled). Image
So why did I highlight the sentence in which you claim the book isn’t meant to be read?

For the same reason I highlighted the sentence before it (which also doesn’t imply that the author hasn’t read the book): namely, that your unearned confidence is hilarious.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 30
misogyny, white supremacy, and abuse

🧵

Here’s the head of the CBMW promoting an article published in American Reformer. Image
American Reformer is an organization whose leadership has documented financial ties to a notorious white supremacist and pornographer. Image
The article itself asserts that those who advocate against abuse in the church are inappropriately empathic due to the influence of feminism.

(Again, this is the article promoted by the head of the CBMW.) Image
Read 13 tweets
Sep 27, 2023
Hello again, Megan.

I understand they deny that they are white Christian nationalists.

But denying something doesn’t mean it isn’t so.

And then there’s the fact that they go and say stuff like this:
Image
If you say that isn’t white Christian nationalism, the disparity in our understanding of what words mean is most likely such that it’s not worth attempting to converse on this or any subject.
If you concede that it is white Christian nationalism, what am I to believe?

Do I believe Stephen Wolfe when he explicitly, obviously, and undeniably advocates *white* Christian nationalism?

Or do I believe him when he denies that he’s advocating white Christian nationalism?
Read 8 tweets
Sep 26, 2023
What do pro-slavery theologians, creation scientists, and white Christian nationalists have in common?
The hermeneutics of legitimization: an approach to biblical interpretation that consistently produces moral justifications for social practices and institutional arrangements that benefit oneself.
The hermeneutics of legitimization has three defining features:

1. Proof-texting;
2. Motivated literalism;
3. Theological paradigm of authority and submission.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(