Elimination of mandatory retirement at 65 is a factor leading to bad academic job market: sciencemag.org/careers/2018/1…

Solution: semi-retirement.

"[Having waited to semi-retire until] 74, I in essence removed 9 years from someone else’s career. I should have stepped aside sooner."
I'd be interested to see a graph of average age of retirement for tenured academics on the same plot as the average age of starting a tenured job over the last decades.

I should probably find Larson's paper and see if that sort of data is there.
The paper is here: pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.128…

Unfortunately, not very big on data. So it doesn't have the figure I want, but the closest is their simulation of number of years as faculty in the lower figure. Image
Given that their no retirement condition increased retirement from 65 to 75, giving the potential of 10 more years but the increase in time as faculty was only ~5 years. I guess this means that in their model faculty are ~5 years older at hiring?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Artem Kaznatcheev

Artem Kaznatcheev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kaznatcheev

18 May
Late last week, Dave Cohen, Pete Jeavons & I updated our paper on what we can learn about easy vs hard fitness landscapes by studying structure of gene-interaction networks (VCSP instances) that represent them: arxiv.org/abs/1907.01218

Now with many more pictures; prettier, too! ImageImageImageImage
I've already made a thread about the previous version of this work that was published in CP2019:

But if there is interest then I could provide some tweets on the new results and changes in this version.
The final version of our paper looking at the kinds of structure of gene-interaction networks that guarantee easy fitness landscapes is finally out: arxiv.org/abs/1907.01218…

It should appear in JAIR soon, and I think I'll do an updated thread on some of the new results then.
Read 4 tweets
5 Mar 19
Local peaks can't always be found quickly! Hard landscapes are subject to ultimate constraint on evolution: computation. Can hide winding paths.


My path to this paper has been very long: ~7 years in the making. It finally found its peak in @GeneticsGSA.
I'm glad to see this paper is popular with twitter. Thanks!

Since I don't have a SoundCloud to plug, I thought I'd make a tweetstorm summarizing the main results of this paper.

There is a lot to go through, so I apologize for the length of the thread. But I hope you enjoy!
Evolutionary constrains keep populations away from local optima (peaks) in fitness landscapes.

I introduce a division of constraints into 2 types: proximal & ultimate.

This is related to computer science distinction between algorithms & problems [1/n]: egtheory.wordpress.com/2018/07/24/evo…
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!