Such that we may have this debate and seek to come to a compromise rather than the bloodiest, longest, most brutal civil war in human history, where tens of millions will certainly die:
(2 of 6)
... a) All Political Speech and Political Affiliation is Protected Speech, and Political Affiliation Protected class.
(3 of 6)
... b) The criminalization of all attempts at suppression of testimonial, truthful, reciprocal, empirical speech, and licensing of extrajudicial punishment to cease them.
(4 of 6)
... c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defense, standing one’s ground, castle doctrine, and civil defense of the commons - licensing shoot-to-kill on the first demonstration of aggression whether by obstruction, challenge, threat, or force.
(5 of 6)
No more lies. We will choose our destiny by Honest discourse or honest violence, but not by the restraint of violence by tolerance for violence and lies.We are incompatible because the Right's Eugenics and Left's Dysgenics are politically incompatible and irreconcilable.
(6 of 6)
So we may grant one another the right of self-determination by political separation, and political enforcement of our differences in right eugenic and evolutionary and left dysgenic strategies.
But neither has the right to deprive the other of self-determination.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(Thoughts)
Our team works in via negativa constructive logic. But we use common terms to avoid neologisms. So for example, when we say 'moral' we mean 'not immoral', and we define immoral as irreciprocal, meaning empirically determined,by universally demonstrated retaliation.
1/n
So while individual, normative, and group variation in moral rules varies by context, this is due to personal, technological, environmental, and historical differences.
2/n
Yet retaliation against irreciprocity is a Universal.
So morality = that which will not provoke retaliation, and will continue cooperation, and the benefits of cooperation.
3/n
Q:"What's the difference between philosophy, epistemology, logic, science?"
A:"Under unification: epistemically, empirically, logically, scientifically: scence=testimony of decidability, logic=spectrum of grammars of disambiguation, and philosophy=choice.
1/n
Why? Because once we know the first principle (law) of the universe we have a single universally commensurable value-neutral system of measurement (disambiguation, comparison) across all disciplines.
2/n
That single first principle is what we call evolution by continuous recursive disambiguation of entropy into persistence. Our language consists of continuous recursive disambiguation into identity for comparison (thinking, reason, calculation, truth, survival, persistence).
3/n
This paragraph looks like ordinary language. But it's reducible to mathematics. But if we reduce it to mathematics we decrease the ability of most to understand and retain it. It is the most inclusive statement possible. And... 1/4
... Christian love is an innovation that arose from observations of the real world (low trust and low trustworthiness of the Jewish people): it was empirical.
But...
2/4
...everything else in faith that prohibits additional progress in human condition by innovation by subsequent empirical, meaning scientific, observation is harmful and has been a harm to mankind since the jews restored Judaism to Jesus creating Xianity, and Arabs to Islam.
3/4
I've had three long-term relationships with single moms. And I loved them. I was reasonably good at it. But there are lessons to be learned: 1) Her children come first, never you. You'll never reach the 'we come first then the kids' stage.
2) Unless you have children with her yourself you'll have a sex and relationship bond but not Familial (Equal) bond, and so you can't reach that 'we come first then the kids' stage. If you have kids, you can. Because now you have equal parental rights and obligations in her mind.
3) The age at which a woman mature sufficiently for a reciprocal relationship is beyond where she is capable and willing to have more children with you. So again, it's difficult to create a familial rather than just sex/relationship/economic bond (that's fragile).
@HebrewCon Good post on 11/22 on soft secession. However, it's just another attempt at creating a separatist movement. And all separatist movements have failed without state protection, and the perils of alliance with the state (as your history repeatedly demonstrates).
While Jews at the upper end, sectarians in the middle, and Gypsies at the lower end, all sought self determination under agrarian empires and states, there is no means of leaving an industrial age empire, other than departure, secession, devolution to federation, or conquest.
The european civilzation stagnated in response to christian destruction of the ancient world (like marxism-pomo-woke destroys the modern). But because it was decentralized (Federated) it has gone through four cycles of restoration where all others stagnated by 800ad.
(relationships) 1/4 I've had 3 marriages, 3 almost marriages (LTRs), a handful of STRs, and a small number of "we're datings". I don't do 1NSs. I "figure it out" whether we're a fit, quickly. Because of my hard-work-obsession, failing health seems to be what ends each of them.
2/4 I have loved each of these women - it's easy for me. It's in my nature to love most people. That said I have only loved one of them with everything in me (American). And only one of them with everything in me AND infinite respect for her. (Ukrainian).
3/4 I can understand my 20-yr marriage as fulfilling my desire to create a power couple - and it worked. But why is it 'power couple' not the general ambition, and instead, marriage for just sex, consumption, and entertainment? It's just a value in the upper classes now (again).