(1/12) The outcome of the #2020Election was statistically implausible.

“First, President @realDonaldTrump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking reelection. He got 11 million more votes than in 2016, the third largest rise in support ever for an incumbent.
(2/12) By way of comparison, President @BarackObama was comfortably reelected in 2012 with 3.5 million fewer votes than he received in 2008.

@realDonaldTrump earned the highest share of all minority votes for a Republican since 1960 (more than a half century ago).
(3/12) @realDonaldTrump grew his support among black voters by 50% over 2016. Nationally, Joe Biden’s black support fell well below 90%, the level below which Democratic presidential candidates usually lose.

Trump increased his share of the national Hispanic vote to 35%.
(4/12) With 60% or less of the national Hispanic vote, it is arithmetically impossible for a Democratic presidential candidate to win Florida, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico. Bellwether states swung further in @realDonaldTrump’s direction than in 2016.
(5/12) Florida, Ohio and Iowa each defied America’s media polls with huge wins for @realDonaldTrump. Since 1852, only Richard Nixon has lost the Electoral College after winning this trio, and that 1960 defeat to John F. Kennedy is still the subject of great suspicion.
(6/12) Midwestern states Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin always swing in the same direction as Ohio and Iowa, their regional peers. Ohio likewise swings with Florida. Current tallies show that, outside of a few cities, the Rust Belt swung in @realDonaldTrump’s direction.
(7/12) Yet, @JoeBiden leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin because of an apparent avalanche of black votes in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee.
(8/12) Biden’s ‘winning’ margin was derived almost entirely from such voters in these cities, as coincidentally his black vote spiked only in exactly the locations necessary to secure victory.
(9/12) He did not receive comparable levels of support among comparable demographic groups in comparable states, which is highly unusual for the presidential victor.

We are told that @JoeBiden won more votes nationally than any presidential candidate in history.
(10/12) But he won a record low of 17% of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties @BarackObama won in 2008. Yet, @JoeBiden somehow outdid Obama in total votes.
(11/12) Victorious presidential candidates, especially challengers, usually have down-ballot coattails; @JoeBiden did not. The Republicans held the Senate and enjoyed a ‘red wave’ in the House, where they gained a large number of seats while winning all 27 toss-up contests.
(12/12) @realDonaldTrump’s party did not lose a single state legislature and actually made gains at the state level.”

— Patrick Basham

#StopTheSteaI

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸

Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_meister

29 Oct 19
1. The Democrats are dead in the water on this impeachment inquiry. The Ukrainian phone call transcript sunk their battleship. Here’s why:
2. The very first reference to the investigation of corruption by Ukraine is by President Zelensky (not Trump) very early on in the call, right after pleasantries are exchanged. Zelensky says “we wanted to drain the swamp here in our country...we brought in many new people.”
3. President Zelensky mentions that the “old” politicians are out and new ones are in. This is a reference to Biden’s getting the former prosecutor fired (i.e., one of the “old” politicians). In the law, we call this “opening the door.”
Read 8 tweets
25 Oct 19
The Barr/Durham criminal investigation will expose the greatest scandal in the history of American politics, restore the rule of law, hold criminals accountable, and bring them all to justice.

See my op-Ed from February 2018 m.theepochtimes.com/opinion-nunes-… (1/11)
It’s an unprecedented scandal that may destroy—at least will severely damage—heretofore revered governmental institutions and the media. (2/11)
The belief that Clinton would win paved the way for this epic, deep state conspiracy, the conspirators believing all would get swept under the rug, once she was in the Oval Office, as the texts between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his FBI paramour Lisa Page plainly showed. (3/11)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!