It was explained to me at the time that the way FB worked was that if a link was getting a ton of traction due to being a hot story then FB would push it in the algorithm more.
But what about when the story was getting old?
Reuse the URL, rewrite the story to reignite it
This meant that in one instance a fact based news story turned into a leftist op-ed
Someone who shared a fact based news story might be shocked to find the link they posted was now pro feminism
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
She made false claims as to my view on the 2020 election saying I supported Trumps fraud narrative despite debating Bannon twice saying Trump lost
She made false claims about our Youtube advertisers dropping us
@AndrewBaileyMO and @KenPaxtonTX should investigate them for criminal fraud.
They appear to be soliciting donations under false pretenses
notice wapo's legally defensive language here
"jammi said"
the reason for this is because her statements are likely false or unverifiable and thus Wapo doesnt want to get sued by making a false statement themselves
They put the claim solely on Jammi, who is lying
we have not lost a single advertiser on youtube
She seems to play this dirty game where we expand our business and then she claims that the change was due to her actions.
We take ads off our site to promote our books, live events, and merch because its more profitable, we start running ads for our own brands to expand external business, diversifying our income, and she immediately claims, falsely, that we lost advertisers and that she was responsible.