Luke Klipp 🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture
Dec 17, 2020 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Parking minimums, a thread.

Why? Because this is something many continue to approach from the perspective of "well I drive and so everywhere I go needs to have parking."

Warning: This was the subject of my master's thesis, so...
(1/16) Image
Firstly, and importantly, parking requirements are neither scientific nor data-based. They are the bureaucratic equivalent of sticking a finger in the air to determine wind speed. Could be accurate, but mostly not. (2/16) Image
What's more, parking minimums are often based on what other cities do. It's literally "oh they do that over there? Then let's do it here too." Cities don't survey existing parking to see if their requirements are rational, and they often are not. (3/16) Image
For instance, why do many cities require 4 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of office space? Because.

Because each parking space requires ~300 square feet, that means many offices have 1,200 square feet of parking for every 1,000 square feet of office space. (4/16) Image
There are huge implications that result from how much parking cities (like LA) require in new construction, around:
- Affordability
- Climate change
- Streetlife
- Small business opportunities
(5/16)
AFFORDABILITY: New apartments are typically built to match the amount of parking that a piece of land can hold. So, parking requirements dictate how many apartments get built. The more parking required, the fewer apartments that get built. (6/16) Image
AFFORDABILITY (2): Parking is also *really* expensive to build, and a single parking space included with an apartment typically accounts for ~10% of the monthly rental price. So, parking requirements drive up the cost of housing. (7/16)
brookings.edu/research/parki…
CLIMATE CHANGE: Off-street parking takes enormous energy to construct, to dig a hole in the ground, produce and pour cement, and then build a structure on top of that. Almost all that energy to construct parking produces carbon dioxide in mass quantities. (8/16) Image
CLIMATE CHANGE (2): And all that parking incentivizes more car driving, baking in the cost of the most expensive part of vehicular ownership--the space to store a car. That space costs more to construct/rent/buy than many cars cost to lease/own. (9/16)
quincycan.org/2018/10/12/par…
STREETLIFE: Parking requirements lead to buildings like this, with housing placed way up in the air, and the floors closest to the street reserved for multiple levels of parking. This means only a portion of the first level is available for street-accessed amenities. (10/16) Image
OPPORTUNITIES: Parking is the tail that wags the dog. In LA, restaurants have to provide 3,000 square feet of parking for every 1,000 square feet of restaurant space (including the kitchen!). Multiplied by hundreds of spaces across a city, this means... (11/16) Image
...Many retail spaces end up staying vacant because they don't have the dedicated off-street parking space, thus denying small business opportunities, which also means fewer jobs in walking distance to many people's homes, and, ironically, more auto-dependence. (12/16) Image
How much impact do parking requirements have? In Downtown Los Angeles, the Adaptive Reuse Ordinance was passed in 1999, allowing for conversation of commercial spaces into housing that were vacant because they didn't have the parking, and... (13/16)
planetizen.com/node/55903
...since then, Downtown LA's population has tripled, with much of that new housing enabled by - guess what - the Adaptive Reuse Ordinance eliminating parking requirements for older buildings. (14/16)
kcet.org/history-societ…
One final note: LA County has 200 square miles of parking, or 3 parking spaces for every car, or about 2-3 times as much space for our cars as we do to house our residents. Parking requirements give higher priority to housing cars than we give to housing people. (15/16) Image
Which is all to say, parking requirements are arbitrary climate denialism and drive up the cost of housing while restricting opportunities for small business. Want to have an immediate impact on making cities more livable? Eliminate parking minimums. (16/16) Image
+1 - This article has some great points about parking, like...
"In Seattle, which is in dire need of new affordable housing, 40% of the land area is currently used for parking." (+1/2)
fastcompany.com/90202222/heres…
"In Jackson, Wyoming, the estimated cost of parking [provided] for each household was $192,138." (Jackson, WY, average annual household income is $75K).

And... "Des Moines... has roughly 1.6 million parking spaces, or 19.4 per household."

(+2/2)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luke Klipp 🏳️‍🌈

Luke Klipp 🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lukehklipp

Jun 6, 2021
What is the practical effect of all the parking that most cities require be built with new housing or commercial buildings? If you've ever wondered about a hole in the ground that looked something like this, then this thread is for you. (1/19)
While I shared a few months ago about parking requirements more generally, I'd like to now explore more of the logistics issues and implications of parking requirements as it relates to... just getting all that parking built. (2/19)
In cities like LA, much of the required parking gets built underground - out of sight, out of mind, right? - and can take 6-12 months to build, at $80K per parking space. Anyone who rents or buys a home in that building will pay for that. (3/19)
la.streetsblog.org/2014/10/17/new…
Read 19 tweets
Sep 9, 2020
Paul Koretz is not my councilmember, but yesterday he killed a transformational project - #UpliftMelrose - that would have saved lives. Koretz rationalized this action with a series of justifications that warrant a response. (thread/14)
Koretz shares "concerns have been expressed by our public safety departments."

While public safety share concerns about room to speed cars down the road or u-turn ladder trucks, what percent of their calls are for traffic violence that could be reduced with this project? (2/14)
He says he's "even driven down Melrose one more time..."

How about walking or riding a bike along it? Or waiting at a bus stop like this? Maybe if he sat on that green bench and waited in the blazing sun for a bus on a 110-degree day he'd have a new perspective. (3/14)
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(