10-K Diver Profile picture
Dec 26, 2020 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, let's talk snowballs.

Snowballs are super fun! And they can teach us so much about life, about things that grow over time, their rates of growth, compounding, etc.
2/

Snowballs are often used as a metaphor for compounding.

A snowball starts small at the top of a hill. As it rolls downhill, it picks up speed and grows in size. This is like money compounding over time.

For example, here's Buffett's famous "snowball quote": Image
3/

There's even a famous book about Buffett with "snowball" in the title.

The book's theme is similar to the quote above: the process of compounding is like a snowball that grows over time as it rolls downhill.

Link: amazon.com/Snowball-Warre… Image
4/

Clearly, snowballs rolling downhill are worthy objects of study.

So let's dive into their physics!

Luckily for us, in 2019, Scott Rubin published a paper analyzing such snowballs -- in a journal called "The Physics Teacher".

All we need to do is understand this paper. Image
5/

We begin by identifying 2 kinds of quantities in our "snowball system":

1. "Parameters" that don't change with time (eg, the hill's angle of incline), and

2. "State Variables" that *do* change with time (eg, the snowball's radius and velocity). Image
6/

We then derive other useful quantities from our parameters and state variables.

Such "derived" quantities include our snowball's mass, its moment of inertia, angular momentum, etc.

This all follows from basic math and physics (eg, the formula for the volume of a sphere). Image
7/

Then we write the "laws of motion" for our snowball.

These are based on various physics principles -- like how a system behaves when subject to torque, Newton's second law, how our snowball accumulates snow as it rolls, etc.

Note: this requires some knowledge of calculus. ImageImageImage
8/

Finally, we tie everything together by creating a system of "differential equations".

These equations describe how our snowball's radius and velocity evolve over time -- as it rolls downhill. Image
9/

The beauty of our differential equations is:

Given our snowball's state (ie, its radius and velocity) at any *one* time, our differential equations allow us to predict its state at any *future* time.
10/

All we need to know is the snowball's initial radius -- when it's at the top of the hill and just starting to roll down.

Just from this, we can calculate our snowball's entire trajectory -- its radius, mass, velocity, momentum, etc., at *every* point on its journey.
11/

How exactly do we calculate all this?

Well, there are standard algorithms to simulate differential equations on a computer.

And our snowball's differential equations are fairly simple. So it's not hard to write a program that simulates a snowball rolling downhill.
12/

In fact, I've written such a program.

That's how I created the snowball GIF at the top of this thread -- by simulating the differential equations describing our snowball.

Here are some sample plots produced by this program: Image
13/

The key thing to note here is that the snowball's acceleration -- ie, the rate at which its speed increases -- seems to level off with time: Image
14/

The paper above by Scott Rubin demonstrates that this must hold true for all snowballs obeying our differential equations: their accelerations must eventually go flat.

And that's a problem -- because it contradicts our nice "snowballs = compounding" metaphor.
15/

Why?

Because, if acceleration flatlines, it means our snowball's *velocity* eventually grows only *linearly* with time.

Which means *radius* also grows only linearly.

And that means our snowball's mass and volume grow only cubically with time. *NOT* exponentially! Image
16/

When we think of *compounding*, we think of our money growing *exponentially* with time.

Whereas the amount of snow in our snowball grows *far* more slowly -- only *polynomially* with time.

Over time, exponential growth *always* beats polynomial growth. Hands down. Image
17/

So here's the sad truth:

Snowballs rolling downhill grow over time (in radius, mass, volume, and speed).

But they don't *compound*.

Compounding requires *exponential* growth. Snowballs only exhibit *polynomial* growth, which is much slower.
18/

Therefore, my humble request to the FinTwit community:

Please stop using snowballs as a metaphor for compounding.

Buffett was clearly straying outside his circle of competence when he used this metaphor. Image
19/

To learn more about differential equations -- like the snowball system we analyzed above -- I highly recommend the work of Prof. Strogatz (@stevenstrogatz).

His book, Infinite Powers, brings to life the magic of calculus and differential equations. amazon.com/Infinite-Power…
20/

If you're somewhat more mathematically inclined, Prof. Strogatz has another gem of a book for you: Non-Linear Dynamics and Chaos. amazon.com/Nonlinear-Dyna…
21/

I also want to give a shout out to Grant Sanderson (@3blue1brown). I used Grant's Manim library to animate the snowball in the first tweet of this thread.

Grant makes beautiful videos explaining math concepts -- like exponential growth and pandemics:
22/

If you're still with me, I cannot thank you enough!

I started writing these long form Twitter threads in April this year. It's been an amazing journey -- and I've been completely blown away by your kindness and encouragement.

Take care. Stay safe. See you in 2021!

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 10-K Diver

10-K Diver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @10kdiver

Jan 1, 2023
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through "Gambler's Ruin".

This is a classic exercise in probability theory.

But going beyond the math, this exercise can teach us a lot about life, business, and investing.
2/

In my mind, Gambler's Ruin is the math of "David vs Goliath" ("Skill vs Size") type situations.

Here, David is a "small" player. He only has limited resources. But he's very skilled.

Pitted against David is Goliath -- a "big" player who has MORE resources but LESS skill.
3/

The battle between David and Goliath rages on for several "rounds".

Each round has a "winner" -- either David or Goliath.

David -- because of his superior skill -- has a higher probability of winning any individual round. That's David's advantage over Goliath.
Read 32 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, we'll explore the question:

As investors, how often should we check stock prices?

To answer this, we'll draw on key ideas and concepts from many different fields -- probability, information theory, psychology, etc.
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC, Inc.

Every day that the market is open, our stock either:

- Goes UP 1%, or
- Goes DOWN 1%.

For simplicity, let's say these are the only 2 possible outcomes on any given trading day.
3/

Suppose we think ABC is a "good" investment.

That is, the company has a wide moat, good returns on capital, decent growth prospects, etc. And the stock trades at a reasonable price.

So, we buy the stock -- expecting to make a very good return on it. Say, ~15% per year.
Read 40 tweets
Oct 23, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through 2 key portfolio diversification principles:

(i) Minimizing correlations, and
(ii) Re-balancing intelligently.

You don't need Markowitz's portfolio theory or the Kelly Criterion to understand these concepts. Image
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC Inc. Ticker: $ABC.

The good thing about ABC is: in 4 out of 5 years (ie, with probability 80%), the stock goes UP 30%.

But the *rest* of the time -- ie, with probability 20%, or in 1 out of 5 years -- the stock goes DOWN 50%.
3/

We have no way to predict in advance which years will be good and which will be bad.

So, let's say we just buy and hold ABC stock for a long time -- like 25 years.

The question is: what return are we most likely to get from ABC over these 25 years?
Read 23 tweets
Sep 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the P/E Ratio.

Why do some companies trade at 5x earnings and others trade at 50x earnings?

When I first started investing, this was hard for me to understand.

So, let me break it down for you.
2/

Imagine we have 2 companies, A and B.

Let's say both companies will earn $1 per share next year.

And both companies will also GROW their earnings at the SAME rate: 10% per year. Every year. Forever.
3/

Suppose A trades at a (forward) P/E Ratio of 10. So, each share of A costs $10.

And B trades at a P/E Ratio of 15. So, each share of B costs $15.

Which is the better long term investment: A or B?
Read 31 tweets
Sep 4, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a fundamental business concept that may be counter-intuitive to some of you:

Just because a business has made $1 of PROFIT, it does NOT mean the business's owners have $1 of CASH to pocket.
2/

To understand why, let's start with how PROFIT is defined.

PROFIT = SALES - COSTS

That is, we take all sales (or revenues) the company made during a quarter or year.

We back out all costs incurred during this period.

That leaves us with profits.

Seems straightforward.
3/

Here's the problem:

The way a "lay person" understands words like SALES and COSTS is completely different from the way an *accountant* uses these same words.

These discrepancies can create enormous confusion.
Read 20 tweets
Aug 28, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a framework that I call "Lindy vs Turkey".

This is a super-useful set of ideas for investors.

Time and again, these ideas have helped me think more clearly about the LONGEVITY of the companies in my portfolio.
2/

Imagine we're buying shares in a company -- ABC Inc.

ABC is a very simple company. It earns $1 per share every year. These earnings don't grow over time.

And ABC returns all its earnings back to its owners -- by issuing a $1/share dividend at the end of each year.
3/

Suppose we buy ABC shares for $5 a share.

That's a P/E ratio of 5.

We know we get back $1/year as a dividend.

So, for us to NOT lose money, ABC should survive AT LEAST 5 more years.

If something happens and ABC DIES before then, we'll likely lose money.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(