Which is one of the reasons why blank slatism and IQ denialism are so widespread among academics despite universally available evidence to the contrary.
"If you want to be the best at what you're doing then having an IQ of above 145 is a necessity."
"Jobs for people with IQs of less than 85 are very very rare."
The average health professional is smart enough to learn the practical part of their profession but not smart enough to learn a sufficient amount of probability and statistics along the way: bbc.com/news/magazine-…
Fermi estimated the strength of an atomic bomb by dropping pieces of paper. Gates immediately saw through an attempt to cheat on him with intransitive dice. Von Neumann spoke Ancient Greek at age 6. Tao taught himself to code math programs at age 6.
"A great writer of software code is worth 10,000 times the price of an average software writer...The best publicity expert can dream up a stunt that attracts millions more customers than the average one." cnbc.com/2020/09/08/net…
“Von Neumann is compelling evidence, I think, that individual genius is important and influential” unherd.com/2021/11/the-ge…
"intuition is more important than knowledge"
In other words, innate talent is more important than education.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Normies who only read what prestigious newspapers and journals highlight for them won't realize the importance of developments like GPT-3 before the nanobots start converting the hemoglobin in their arteries into computronium.
If you want to know about important or interesting developments and ideas before they go mainstream you need to be comfortable with noise in the form of crazy and wrong ideas and follow nonconformists cranks.
When it comes to major Western countries like the United States and Germany, the left has decisively won the culture war and is now in control of most institutions. BUT it hasn't won the war against reality.
1. Left-wing economic policies such as Marxism have failed spectacularly each time they have been tried.
2. Eugenics actually works, as anyone breeding livestock or plants can certify. Indeed, countries like Germany still have eugenics laws against incest and Jews screen their babies for genetic diseases. In Iceland, most babies with Down syndrome are aborted.
"...it should be possible to harvest around 6 microwatts at around 180 meters (590 ft) from a 5G transmitter."
"An energy-harvesting circuit based on graphene could be incorporated into a chip to provide clean, limitless, low-voltage power for small devices or sensors," phys.org/news/2020-10-p…
Scientists have observed a single-cell alga evolve in real time into a multicellular organism. The transition took around a year and was caused by the introduction of a predator into the environment. nature.com/articles/s4159…
The ctenophore’s brain suggests that, if evolution began again, intelligence would re-emerge
“invented neurons, muscles & other specialised tissues, independently from the rest of the animal kingdom, using different starting materials" aeon.co/essays/what-th…
Whenever someone publicly "wastes" food for a purpose other than eating, someone else comes along and complains about it by citing "hunger in Africa".
What's your best steel man argument in support of this complaint?
For example, if I, living in Germany, was to take a bar of edible chocolate and just threw it in the garbage, how would this behavior negatively affect the food supply in poor countries like Yemen?
Some answers I got so far:
1. Wasting food will raise prices for globally traded food commodities, which will mean that those on lower incomes can afford to eat less.