The reality is very simple: The Republican Party is no longer participating in democracy. They're running a series of ops against every election cycle, predicated on the notion that only their power is legitimate.
This isn't a failed coup. This is a *continuous* coup that stretches back years. It includes Gingrich's scorched earth methods, Bush v Gore, the politicizing of the Bush DoJ, the judicial obstructionism and nullification of the McConnell Senate, and the entire Trump presidency.
It includes decades of tortured racist gerrymandering and disenfranchisement, Citizens United, the dismantling of the Voting Rights Act, PACs, and deliberately colluding with foreign powers.

This isn't a failed coup. This is a *continuous* coup that stretches back years.
The Republican Party is not participating in democracy. They are quite obviously an organization dedicated to the destruction and overthrow of the government of the U.S. as we know it, and should be treated as such.

There are no legitimate Republican office-holders.
I think there's a distinction to be made. Democrats are often weak/ineffective, and many are complicit because they're those things by choice—but institutionally they aren't authoritarian, and they aren't fascist. They're a corporatist conservative party.
Basically the Democrats are what the media-writ-large pretends Republicans are. They have a left-leaning wing the media-writ-large pretends is a far-left flank of the Democratic party, a party they also pretend is, on average, at least as far left as its most far-left members.
We'd have far less problems if the Democrats were what the Republicans are always saying they are.

But the Republicans are a far-right party of authoritarian extremists, who are actively demolishing democracy.
This is the trajectory the Republican Party has been on for my whole life. It's not sustainable. They're opposed to governance and even knowable reality, on principle.

We can't let this go on.
I understand that this sounds extreme. It *is* extreme.

140 House members and at least 1 Senator are going to object to the peaceful transfer of power the grounds that they should not be allowed to lose power.

Anti-democracy is the mainstream GOP position. That's extreme.
They're doing so on behalf of an openly authoritarian, openly white-supremacist, openly corrupt president who aligns with them on almost all policy points, including the notion that 320,000 dead Americans and counting is no responsibility of theirs.

That's extreme.
The president's National Security Advisor was an undeclared foreign operative who went to prison for lying to the FBI about his dealings with Russia.

Trump pardoned him and he returned to the White House in recent weeks to urge him to stage a military coup.

That's extreme.
Trump was impeached for using his office to offer bribes to the Ukranian government in exchange for helping destabilize the 2020 election. Republicans refused to even hear testimony. Trump's attorney made the case nothing the president does can be illegal.

That's extreme.
126 Republican congresspeople signed on to a meritless suit brought without standing by Texas to overturn the result of the Pennsylvania election, basically on the grounds that Republicans should not lose elections.

Anti-democracy is mainstream Republicanism.

That's extreme.
Weeks before the 2020 election, the Republican Senate forced through an inexperienced far-right ideologue who couldn't name the rights protected by the First Amendment, specifically because Trump intended to use the courts to decide the election. He SAID that.

That's extreme.
That is just the shit that happened LAST year.

No—it's just SOME of it.

It's just the stuff that's occurred to me as I write. It barely touched on the deliberate sabotage of our pandemic response.

There's nothing you can say about mainstream Republicanism that isn't extreme.
If you're not *deeply* concerned, you aren't being the realist. You're not being the adult in the room. You aren't facilitating unity. You're enabling unreality.

Very simply, you're wrong.

They aren't participants in our democracy. They should be understood as such.
God, I didn't even mention that they literally sabotaged the postal service during a pandemic.

I didn't even mention the armed white supremacist terrorist occupation of a government building.

If you sit and think it just keeps coming. It's relentless.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon

A.R. Moxon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

30 Dec 20
If you program them to slaughter a crowd of protesters they’ll do it with similar precision.
Oh and at least 1 of our 2 major political parties will absolutely program robots to slaughter a crowd of protesters.
“‘Deactivate murder robots’ is a terrible slogan that confuses white suburban robot murder aficionados, and you saying it is why we lost House seats in Texas. Think of a snappier slogan, like: ‘give murder robots extra money and make them spend 68% of it on less murdery stuff.’”
Read 4 tweets
29 Dec 20
Observe: the lie that "government" is a monolithic entity, from which we are somehow separate.

Government is how we organize, manage and maintain our society, but to acknowledge that is to acknowledge society, and one's responsibility to organize, manage, and maintain it.
Government didn't close churches. Churches closed because people with something more than a childishly selfish view of the world understood their responsibility to the shared life of a society, and government is how that understanding was operationalized and delivered.
Nor does government militarize police. The police is militarized because people with a fearful, hateful or selfish view of the world understand a militarized police will operationalize & deliver that fear, hate, and greed through the mechanism of government.

Government is *us*.
Read 10 tweets
27 Dec 20
It's important to remember that Trump suits Republicans—whose entire strategy is engineering government failure to use as a pretext to further dismantle government—perfectly.

This is a party that exists only to demolish society.

A thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy.
They've created an alternate reality, in which people can claim morality based solely on their own personal intention, regardless of result, allowing them to engage in sociopathic cruelty and overweening moralism simultaneously.

For certain people, it's a VERY popular reality.
To watch Trump succeed despite epic failure is to understand: U.S. society is based on knowing enablement of the violent abuse of marginalized people—mostly young, mostly of color, mostly women, mostly poor—by powerful people—mostly older, mostly white, mostly men, mostly rich.
Read 7 tweets
23 Dec 20
My pitch is, Superman goes on Jeopardy, and he does pretty well, like 2nd place but a respectable 2nd place? like he only loses by $300 because the other guy bets it all on Final Jeopardy, but he gets the home edition of the game, which he plays against Jimmy and Lois and wins.
I don’t see how I can tell that story in less than five movies.
Read 4 tweets
22 Dec 20
Rand Paul is outraged by the distribution of $600 he considers unearned, and the death of 300,000 people he considers unworthy is to him an acceptable price to pay to avoid distribution. No death rate could be too steep, any relief would be too high. He’d like to talk about soul.
We've seen conservative morality unmasked. Its prime principle is the belief that some people matter, the rest do not, and to spend a single dollar on someone who doesn't matter is a mortal sin, whereas using those deaths as pretext to further enrich people who matter is virtue.
Ask yourself: what would such people do in a larger emergency? What contingencies have they already devised for such an event?

What will they do as the earth warms and oceans rise? As water becomes scarce?

Yes, and what are they already doing?
Read 7 tweets
22 Dec 20
Any serious look at mid 19th century American history recognizes that Robert E Lee fought a treasonous war against his own country to preserve chattel slavery. I’m sorry if a generation raised on revisionist history and Rush Limbaugh doesn’t recognize that.
The funniest thing about dudes like this is the way they pompously assume we haven’t heard the bullshit apologist version of the Robert E Lee for our entire lives, and that our rejection of it is a result of lazy ignorance rather than earned awareness.
The Robert E Lee who abhorred slavery and only took up arms against his count with a great but honorable reluctance is literally the dominant cultural version of his story over the last century, and a cornerstone of white supremacist strategic rehabilitation of the Confederacy.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!