A.R. Moxon Profile picture
Jan 1, 2021 22 tweets 6 min read Read on X
The reality is very simple: The Republican Party is no longer participating in democracy. They're running a series of ops against every election cycle, predicated on the notion that only their power is legitimate.
This isn't a failed coup. This is a *continuous* coup that stretches back years. It includes Gingrich's scorched earth methods, Bush v Gore, the politicizing of the Bush DoJ, the judicial obstructionism and nullification of the McConnell Senate, and the entire Trump presidency.
It includes decades of tortured racist gerrymandering and disenfranchisement, Citizens United, the dismantling of the Voting Rights Act, PACs, and deliberately colluding with foreign powers.

This isn't a failed coup. This is a *continuous* coup that stretches back years.
The Republican Party is not participating in democracy. They are quite obviously an organization dedicated to the destruction and overthrow of the government of the U.S. as we know it, and should be treated as such.

There are no legitimate Republican office-holders.
I think there's a distinction to be made. Democrats are often weak/ineffective, and many are complicit because they're those things by choice—but institutionally they aren't authoritarian, and they aren't fascist. They're a corporatist conservative party.
Basically the Democrats are what the media-writ-large pretends Republicans are. They have a left-leaning wing the media-writ-large pretends is a far-left flank of the Democratic party, a party they also pretend is, on average, at least as far left as its most far-left members.
We'd have far less problems if the Democrats were what the Republicans are always saying they are.

But the Republicans are a far-right party of authoritarian extremists, who are actively demolishing democracy.
This is the trajectory the Republican Party has been on for my whole life. It's not sustainable. They're opposed to governance and even knowable reality, on principle.

We can't let this go on.
I understand that this sounds extreme. It *is* extreme.

140 House members and at least 1 Senator are going to object to the peaceful transfer of power the grounds that they should not be allowed to lose power.

Anti-democracy is the mainstream GOP position. That's extreme.
They're doing so on behalf of an openly authoritarian, openly white-supremacist, openly corrupt president who aligns with them on almost all policy points, including the notion that 320,000 dead Americans and counting is no responsibility of theirs.

That's extreme.
The president's National Security Advisor was an undeclared foreign operative who went to prison for lying to the FBI about his dealings with Russia.

Trump pardoned him and he returned to the White House in recent weeks to urge him to stage a military coup.

That's extreme.
Trump was impeached for using his office to offer bribes to the Ukranian government in exchange for helping destabilize the 2020 election. Republicans refused to even hear testimony. Trump's attorney made the case nothing the president does can be illegal.

That's extreme.
126 Republican congresspeople signed on to a meritless suit brought without standing by Texas to overturn the result of the Pennsylvania election, basically on the grounds that Republicans should not lose elections.

Anti-democracy is mainstream Republicanism.

That's extreme.
Weeks before the 2020 election, the Republican Senate forced through an inexperienced far-right ideologue who couldn't name the rights protected by the First Amendment, specifically because Trump intended to use the courts to decide the election. He SAID that.

That's extreme.
That is just the shit that happened LAST year.

No—it's just SOME of it.

It's just the stuff that's occurred to me as I write. It barely touched on the deliberate sabotage of our pandemic response.

There's nothing you can say about mainstream Republicanism that isn't extreme.
If you're not *deeply* concerned, you aren't being the realist. You're not being the adult in the room. You aren't facilitating unity. You're enabling unreality.

Very simply, you're wrong.

They aren't participants in our democracy. They should be understood as such.
God, I didn't even mention that they literally sabotaged the postal service during a pandemic.

I didn't even mention the armed white supremacist terrorist occupation of a government building.

If you sit and think it just keeps coming. It's relentless.
Update: The Republican Party is *still* not participating in our democracy, and should be treated as an organization dedicated to the overthrow of the U.S. government.

This is an *ongoing* coup stretching back decades.

Republicans aren't participating in democracy. It's fundamentally authoritarian, and should be treated as an organization dedicated to the overthrow of the U.S. government.

This is an *ongoing* coup stretching back decades.

This is an *ongoing* coup, stretching back decades, strategically waged by Republicans.

Republicans are not participating in our democracy. They should be treated as an organization dedicated to the overthrow of the U.S. government.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Any Republican who holds office is engaged in an *ongoing* coup, because the entire premise of the Republican Party is that the government should fail.

Which anyone can clearly observe. Where Republicans hold power, we simply do not have a functioning government—by design.
This is an *ongoing* coup, a part of a civil war that is currently being won by the side that declared it, because they're the only side that's fighting it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon

A.R. Moxon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

Jul 20
My book is about the tradition of American supremacy & the ways it shapes all of our lives, sabotages our natural shared society in order to steal all value from it for a few, makes others pay its unnaturally high costs ... and what we can do about it. armoxon.com/books/very-fin…
I find it useful to begin with art—with the idea that humans are art. The idea that to be a human is to be a unique expression of unsurpassable worth, whose worth is natural and inherent.

Focusing on this truth makes it easier to spot supremacy's anti-human lies.
These laws are *foundational*—literally, present at our founding. Our founding lies are:
1. We are not related to one another; a rejection of society
2. Life must be earned; a rejection of the humanity of others
3. Violence redeems; a rejection of one's own humanity
Read 10 tweets
Jul 14
Well I'm given to understand that today & for a VERY limited time, our nation's political violence party is shocked—shocked!—to learn that we currently live in a world of normalized political violence, and would like very much to know who is to blame.

(link to essay in thread) Photo by Sandi Bachom shows a truck with a vinyl wrap depicting Joe Biden bound and lying in the bed.
I'm kidding, of course. They've already decided who is to blame. It's the same culprit they hold at fault for every other real and imaginary problem in their lives: Everybody except them.
I think we all know the news by now. Yesterday in Pennsylvania, a gunman took some shots in the direction of the former president—the adjudicated rapist, 34-time convicted felon, insurrectionist, and daily fomenter of political violence, Donald Trump.
Read 53 tweets
Jul 13
LOST is streaming on Netflix—an excellent time to revisit the show, using the viewing guide I'm publishing in my newsletter (link in thread).

Many think the story isn't coherent. I think it was. My lens is the one the show itself suggests: a dialectic of observation and belief. John Locke holds two game pieces; one dark, one light.
This dialectic isn’t too tough to detect. There’s even an episode called “Man of Science, Man of Faith.” In a dialectic, the opposing ideas operate in concert with one another. While these ideas are oppositional within the artistic work, they aren’t opposites. John Locke and Jack Shephard sit on a beach.
The main reason I want to do this is as an investigation of story—particularly an investigation the way I look at story. LOST is story that lends itself very well to investigation of how story does and doesn’t work.
Read 28 tweets
Jul 6
I've been thinking of American conservatism—which has proved itself irreducible from American fascism—in terms of burdens.

I find burdens an apt metaphor, because christian fascists claim to worship a Jewish rabbi from antiquity named Yeshu ben Yosef (Mr. Jesus if you're nasty). illustration of an elderly peasant carrying a clergyman and a nobleman on his stooped back
Interesting thing about young Mr. Jesus: He was very sharp-tongued with the politically influential religious hypocrites of his day. There's a whole chapter of him reading them the riot act, calling them whitewashed tombs and broods of vipers and blind guides etc etc.
It's a real hum-dinger that ends with Mr. Jesus saying he doesn't really see how any of them are going to escape being condemned to hell, and you should check out the whole thing, but today I just want to think about his open salvo, which is an amazing tee-shot.
Read 15 tweets
Jun 24
I want to dig into this, since my book VERY FINE PEOPLE comes out tomorrow, and it's in large part about precisely this sort of polemic trickery in service of bullshit apologia of supremacy.

There's a slight of hand at the start that catapults us into the massive lie.
Let's do the slight of hand, first. The article presupposes to answer the question "Did Trump call Neo-Nazis and white supremacists 'very fine people'?

This is savvy if what you want to exonerate the comments, because it answers the wrong question, and dismisses the right one.
What Trump said is that there are "very fine people on both sides."

That would be the side counter protesting against the Nazis who organized a pro-Confederacy protest.

And then the side full of Nazis and those who found common cause with Nazis.

That's the "both sides."
Read 24 tweets
Jun 22
THE HUMAN PROBLEM
Last week an image went viral online. It was generated by a computer from the classic movie 12 Angry Men. It added no value, and it was being used for no good reason.

It's a perfect encapsulation of where our dominant cultural narrative has brought us. A grotesque AI generated extension of a scene from 12 Angry Men.
It's my belief that things that provide positive value to humans are good, and that those who make good things should be compensated for it.

I also believe that people should have access to good things whether or not they can pay. It's the reason I love libraries, for example.
This strikes me as an appropriate way to organize society, provided that we believe society is meant to benefit humans rather than money, and that humans—being inherent generators of value and of limitless potential value—deserve the fruits of society even if they can't pay.
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(